Quantcast
Channel: All Things Crime Blog
Viewing all 1600 articles
Browse latest View live

Calling Rob Ford: Where’s the Humor in Mayoral Malfeasance?

$
0
0

by Pamela Stewart

There was trouble brewing in the hood. People connected to the rich and powerful were making threats to bring down the heat on the drug dealers and gangs if they didn’t get what they wanted.

Sounds like an episode of Breaking Bad, but this story is straight out of the Toronto Police Services investigation into Mayor Rob Ford and his buddy, Alexander “Sandro” Lisi.

for10The Toronto Star and other newspapers have spent considerable resources on their investigations. The film rights have been sold for Star reporter Robin Doolittle’s best-seller, Crazy Town: The Rob Ford Story, but the real story is in the hundreds of pages of police documents that the media petitioned the courts to release to the public.

Ford and Lisi are the subject of Toronto Police investigation Project Brazen 2. Toronto Police turned the investigation over to the Ontario Provincial Police after Rob and his brother, City Councillor Doug Ford, accused Chief Bill Blair of “playing politics”. The investigation is now back in the hands of Toronto after the OPP couldn’t find any evidence against Ford. Project Brazen 2 came about because of an investigation into guns, drugs and gangs called Project Traveller.

Police surveillance of Ford and Lisi

Police surveillance of Ford and Lisi

On May 18th, 2013, Project Traveller intercepts a call between LISI and SIYAD (Dixon City Bloods gang member) speaking about the widely reported “crack” video. I believe that Lisi is threatening Siyad that the police will be brought down onto Siyad’s neighbourhood if Siyad does not get the video featuring Robert Ford smoking what appears to be a narcotic. During the communication, Lisi tells Siyad that “Yo (unintelligible) you see the heat, bro? You see the heat on Dixon, bro?” He goes on to say it is going to “get worse and worse” and “the whole place is going to get heated up all summer until that f–king phone gets back, the whole place … is going to get lit right up.” He closes by telling Siyad to “put the message out to your people … that the whole place is going to get heated.”

“He’s a good guy. I don’t throw my friends under the bus.” This is Rob Ford describing his relationship with his drug dealer friend after Lisi was arrested and charged with drug trafficking in 2013. Ford wrote a character reference letter for Lisi on City of Toronto stationary.

for7Lisi is well-known to police. He has a history of arrests and convictions for threats and violence against women. He threatened to have had acid thrown in one woman’s face and he directed a throat cutting motion with his hand at another.

Lisi allegedly used more insidious methods to threaten people who got on his bad side. The Toronto Star interviewed two people who stated that Lisi showed them a container of bedbugs and told them that he would infect someone’s house with the nasty creatures.

Ford claims he has done nothing wrong and he doesn’t seem to understand why he is being investigated by the police. The cops have observed suspicious behavior, such as Lisi placing a package in Ford’s vehicle while the mayor was in a gas station convenience store. You’d think a politician who is running for re-election would stay away from criminals, but Ford isn’t smart enough or straight enough to do so.

Ford and Lisi at Steak Queen

Ford and Lisi at Steak Queen

 

A videotape was released on January 21, 2014 showing Ford in the company of Lisi at the Steak Queen Restaurant on the same day that Ford was filmed speaking Jamaican Patois and talking down the police chief in a drunken and offensive rant.

Ford and gang members

Ford and gang members

Who hasn’t had a few too many or smoked some weed? Perhaps that’s why Ford Nation is still supporting the admitted crack smoker. Ford tries to come across as a good ol’ boy who just likes to hang out with other average Joes. The problem is that Ford isn’t average. He came from a life of privilege. The people he likes to spend time with don’t reflect the folks who work hard and pay the Toronto taxes he claims to save. Most of those people have never been to a crack house. They aren’t friends with people like Lisi, or Elena Basso, the owner of that infamous house at 15 Windsor Road, Etobicoke.  Rob’s “Ford Nation” may overlook his admission of smoking crack because they think he is saving them tax dollars. They accept his excuse that he isn’t perfect, but they aren’t looking at the bigger picture.

I know something about crack. In the ‘80s, my husband and father of my two sons started doing a lot of cocaine. I broke up with him and he spiraled downward, losing his well-paying job in IT. After he could no longer afford coke, he became a crack addict.  How do you explain to your young children why their father is panhandling in front of the liquor store?

How do you explain to children today that the man who runs their city did crack while in a drunken stupor? I have no idea if my ex-husband is dead or alive. Over the years, he has been in and out of jail for committing crimes to fuel his addiction. The two go hand in hand and that’s why we can’t excuse Ford for his actions.

for11Toronto is a vibrant city, but Canadians have always had an inferiority complex when it comes to our relationship with the United States. Some people feel that Rob Ford has put Toronto on the map. I’m sure most Americans wouldn’t be able to name any of Toronto’s previous mayors. Ford is the pet project of Jimmy Kimmel. Former U.S. President Bill Clinton said that Ford has “absolutely destroyed every stereotype about Canadians.” We all like to laugh at his shenanigans because he is a bumbling fool.

The Globe and Mail recently reported that Pilgrim Studios contacted Ford about a reality TV show while he was in town for his appearance on Jimmy Kimmel. The production company already produces shows about other troubled individuals such as Lindsay Lohan and glorifies illegal activities such as street racing in Street Outlaws.

for4The proliferation of selfies taken with the mayor pop up by the hundreds on Twitter and Instagram. He is still rating fairly high in the polls and his fans seem to ignore Rob’s relationships with criminals like Lisi. Those of us who have some insight into substance abuse or believe that the people they vote for should have some ethics and values don’t get it. There are probably all kinds of other dark truths about Ford that haven’t come out and maybe they never will, and that isn’t funny.

You know that saying, how can you tell when an addict is lying? He’s opening his mouth. That is Rob Ford. He is an embarrassment. He is probably the only politician to go down in history for telling the media that he gets “plenty to eat at home” on live television. He had the nerve to drag his poor wife in front of the cameras to apologize for his disgusting comments. We were all thinking the same thing – we wanted that vision out of our heads.

for9Rob has made himself vulnerable to blackmail by being in the company of drug addicts and gangbangers. His addled brain doesn’t recognize that these are the same people who film him engaging in illegal activities and spouting homophobic and racist comments.

Unlike Lisi, Rob may not be evil, but he hasn’t grown up. Mr. Tough Guy, Lisi, still lives in his parent’s basement, so you could say the same for him.

Ford doesn’t throw his friends under the bus for one reason. They do his dirty work. On October 31st, 2013, Lisi was arrested and charged with Extortion for attempting to retrieve the “crack” video. There are probably other people on Rob’s payroll who are taking care of the Mayor’s extracurricular activities.

On May 20th, 2013, SIYAD is intercepted by Project Traveller making a phone call to Elena BASSO about SIYAD not having the video with Robert FORD in it. I have listened to this intercepted communication and have reviewed the related intercept summary.

SIYAD tells BASSO that if he had the video he would have brought “it to your house and give it to you directly to give to Rob.”

SIYAD also tells BASSO that he is going to get the video. BASSO states that Robert FORD did it “in my house and now I, never mind, I got, I got Rob’s fucking people and Cops coming here every fucking day.” SIYAD responds with “I know. They’re fucking chasing after me, think I have the video”.

BASSO goes on to say that “G brought down heat on this whole fuckin’ area” and that Robert FORD has “got power” and “it doesn’t matter who’s right or wrong, everybody’s going to go fucking, if we’re going to feel the heat everywhere”. SIYAD ends the conversation by telling BASSO “Yeah just tell Rob I don’t have that shit, man.”

for5Ford says he isn’t a criminal, but he has admitted to criminal acts. He was arrested by Miami police in 1999 and charged with drunk driving and marijuana possession. He pled guilty to possession and refusing to provide a breath sample and received a fine and community service. Ford was also charged with assault in a hockey fight when he was 18, but the charges were dismissed. In 2008, Ford was charged with uttering a death threat and assault against his wife. The charges were withdrawn.

Ask Rob about his drinking or bad behavior and he points out that he isn’t the only person who has ever misbehaved or been intoxicated. “I’m not perfect” may be true, but it isn’t an excuse. Rob has learned that if you say you are saving taxpayers’ money, even if it is a lie, and you give people something to laugh about, you’ll resonate with a certain demographic – those who have been dumbed down by reality TV, or never really thought about consequences. You don’t have to be intelligent to be a master manipulator. Drug addicts and criminals do it all the time.

 

Pamela Stewart photoPamela Stewart is a freelance writer and former private investigator. She lives north of Toronto in Jackson’s Point. This lakeside town is the kind of place where people don’t lock their doors. It’s a safe space for Pamela to explore the dark side of life in her fiction and nonfiction. She also writes about more pleasant things when the sun is shining.

 

 

 

 


Patrick H. Moore Has been Interviewed on Arrest Records.Com. Check It Out!

$
0
0

Independent blogger, PI and crime writer Pamela Stewart has been kind enough to interview Patrick H. Moore for Arrest Records.com. http://blog.arrestrecords.com/. In the interview, Patrick and Pamela focus on true crime, Sentencing Mitigation work and crime fiction.

Take a moment and check out the interview! Pamela is our newest contributor and we are grateful for all her help.

It’s been 42 years since Patrick’s last arrest so hopefully he won’t be showing up on Arrest Records.Com as a statistic! :-)

Ten Totally Botched U.S. Executions

$
0
0

afterword by Patrick H. Moore

Capital punishment has been eradicated in all of western Europe and most of eastern and central Europe. Most of the countries of the Americas have also abolished the death penalty. Indeed, it was repealed in South Africa after the end of apartheid, where it clearly had been one of the tools of repression used by whites against the black majority. (Countries still using the death penalty include China, Japan, and many Muslim nations.)

Michael Roberts of Denver Westward Blogs compiled the following group of ten U.S. executions that went horribly and inexcusably wrong. He culled the text for the first nine items from Radelet’s item “Examples of Post-Furman Botched Executions,” shared by the Death Penalty Information Center. The final item is derived from Alan Prendergast’s 2012 post “Eddie Ives’s botched execution and replacing the noose with the gas chamber.”

So without further ado:

 

dpFrank James Coppola.

August 10, 1982. Virginia. Electrocution.

Although no media representatives witnessed the execution and no details were ever released by the Virginia Department of Corrections, an attorney who was present later stated that it took two 55-second jolts of electricity to kill Coppola. The second jolt produced the odor and sizzling sound of burning flesh, and Coppola’s head and leg caught on fire. Smoke filled the death chamber from floor to ceiling with a smoky haze.

 

dp2Jimmy Lee Gray

Sept. 2, 1983. Mississippi. Asphyxiation.

Officials had to clear the room eight minutes after the gas was released when Gray’s desperate gasps for air repulsed witnesses. His attorney, Dennis Balske of Montgomery, Alabama, criticized state officials for clearing the room when the inmate was still alive. Said noted death penalty defense attorney David Bruck, “Jimmy Lee Gray died banging his head against a steel pole in the gas chamber while the reporters counted his moans (eleven, according to the Associated Press).” Later it was revealed that the executioner, Barry Bruce, was drunk.

 

dp3John Evans

April 22, 1983. Alabama. Electrocution.

After the first jolt of electricity, sparks and flames erupted from the electrode attached to Evans’s leg. The electrode burst from the strap holding it in place and caught on fire. Smoke and sparks also came out from under the hood in the vicinity of Evans’s left temple. Two physicians entered the chamber and found a heartbeat. The electrode was reattached to his leg, and another jolt of electricity was applied. This resulted in more smoke and burning flesh. Again the doctors found a heartbeat. Ignoring the pleas of Evans’s lawyer, a third jolt of electricity was applied. The execution took fourteen minutes and left Evans’s body charred and smoldering.

 

dp4Raymond Landry

December 13, 1988. Texas. Lethal Injection.

Pronounced dead 40 minutes after being strapped to the execution gurney and 24 minutes after the drugs first started flowing into his arms. Two minutes after the drugs were administered, the syringe came out of Landry’s vein, spraying the deadly chemicals across the room toward witnesses. The curtain separating the witnesses from the inmate was then pulled, and not reopened for fourteen minutes while the execution team reinserted the catheter into the vein. Witnesses reported “at least one groan.” A spokesman for the Texas Department of Correction, Charles Brown (sic), said, “There was something of a delay in the execution because of what officials called a ‘blowout.’ The syringe came out of the vein, and the warden ordered the (execution) team to reinsert the catheter into the vein.”

 

dp5Jesse Joseph Tafero

May 4, 1990. Florida. Electrocution.

During the execution, six-inch flames erupted from Tafero’s head, and three jolts of power were required to stop his breathing. State officials claimed that the botched execution was caused by “inadvertent human error” — the inappropriate substitution of a synthetic sponge for a natural sponge that had been used in previous executions. They attempted to support this theory by sticking a part of a synthetic sponge into a“common household toaster” and observing that it smoldered and caught fire.

 

dp6Stephen Peter Morin

March 13, 1985. Texas. Lethal Injection.

Because of Morin’s history of drug abuse, the execution technicians were forced to probe both of Morin’s arms and one of his legs with needles for nearly 45 minutes before they found a suitable vein.

 

dp7Pedro Medina

March 25, 1997. Florida.  Electrocution.

A crown of foot-high flames shot from the headpiece during the execution, filling the execution chamber with a stench of thick smoke and gagging the two dozen official witnesses. An official then threw a switch to manually cut off the power and prematurely end the two-minute cycle of 2,000 volts. Medina’s chest continued to heave until the flames stopped and death came. After the execution, prison officials blamed the fire on a corroded copper screen in the headpiece of the electric chair, but two experts hired by the governor later concluded that the fire was caused by the improper application of a sponge (designed to conduct electricity) to Medina’s head.

 

dp8Stephen McCoy

May 24, 1989. Texas. Lethal Injection.

He had such a violent physical reaction to the drugs (heaving chest, gasping, choking, back arching off the gurney, etc.) that one of the witnesses (male) fainted, crashing into and knocking over another witness. Houston attorney Karen Zellars, who represented McCoy and witnessed the execution, thought the fainting would catalyze a chain reaction. The Texas Attorney General admitted the inmate “seemed to have a somewhat stronger reaction,” adding “The drugs might have been administered in a heavier dose or more rapidly.”

 

dp9Rickey Ray Rector

January 24, 1992. Arkansas. Lethal Injection.

It took medical staff more than fifty minutes to find a suitable vein in Rector’s arm. Witnesses were kept behind a drawn curtain and not permitted to view this scene, but reported hearing Rector’s eight loud moans throughout the process. During the ordeal Rector (who suffered from serious brain damage) helped the medical personnel find a vein. The administrator of State’s Department of Corrections medical programs said (paraphrased by a newspaper reporter) “the moans did come as a team of two medical people that had grown to five worked on both sides of his body to find a vein.” The administrator said “That may have contributed to his occasional outbursts.” The difficulty in finding a suitable vein was later attributed to Rector’s bulk and his regular use of antipsychotic medication.

 

dp10Eddie Ives

Ives, a barber and burglar, had been convicted of the fatal shooting of a cop after Denver police crashed an illegal booze party on Curtis Street. (A second officer was wounded in the 1928 shooting, only to be slain a few days later by a nurse at Denver General Hospital who happened to be his spurned lover; Denver’s scandal-crazy dailies pumped that case into a Roaring Twenties version of “the crime of the century,” as detailed in my 2003 feature “Love Crazy.”) He managed to stall his execution for months by pretending to be insane, dipping his chow in the toilet in his cell and babbling in strange tongues.

After that ploy failed and he was pronounced sane, Ives won another delay when a riot at the state penitentiary gutted three cell houses and left twelve dead, including seven guards. One of the casualties was Jack Eeles, 77, who’d been the prison’s hangman for thirty years.

Ives, who weighed only eighty pounds, had a longstanding belief that he was going to beat the noose. “Hell,” he reportedly told a Denver detective years before he got the death sentence, “they couldn’t hang me if they wanted to. A noose couldn’t crack my neck. I’m too small to spring the trap.”

But time ran out for Ives on January 10, 1930. He was escorted to the gallows, the noose tightened around his neck. A guard pulled a lever that sent a weight hurtling down a chute. The weight was supposed to pull the rope taut; then the prisoner would break his neck as he fell through the trap. But Ives was too light. As the weight fell, he went hurtling toward the ceiling. The rope jumped off the pulley and Ives fell to the floor, gasping for breath.

“You can’t hang a man twice,” he said.

But they did. According to one witness, it took three attempts. Ives was strangled for 23 minutes before he was pronounced dead. At that time, the executions were closed to the press, but word leaked out of his slow and excruciating demise. “Colorado has one of the most ghastly hanging machines possible,” Thomas Tynan, a former warden for the penitentiary, told the Rocky Mountain News. “More than half of the men executed have not been hanged at all. They have strangled.”

 *     *     *     *     *

I’ve long thought that the sensible and merciful way to execute inmates would be to simply give them a massive dose of narcotics. It could be given to them in their food or administered by a simple intra-muscular injection. No need for all that nasty probing for a vein. The inmates would die peacefully and painlessly. There would be very little drama and no possibility of human error. So why hasn’t this common sense approach been adopted? You tell me, my friends…

The Day the Blade Runner Took off His Blades

$
0
0

commentary by Patrick H. Moore

It was an amazing day in the life of the Blade Runner, Oscar Pistorius. He had spent several weeks listening to the prosecution make its case and then they had all sat out for a week while the court was in recess. But Monday and Tuesday it was Oscar’s turn which culminated in the Blade Runner taking off his blades and standing by the bloody door while howling in such anguish that the court adjourned for the rest of the day.

bla10But Pistorius didn’t start out in a paroxysm of grief. Rather, he was subdued and quiet, restrained as he described his and Reeva Steenkamp’s last night together.

Guided by his defense lawyer Barry Roux, on Tuesday the former Olympian explained that he and the deceased  had dinner about 7 pm and then, just like any couple in the modern world, sat chatting in the bedroom with the television on. Then they looked at pictures on Steenkamp’s phone. The Blade Runner fell asleep sometime after 9:00 and woke up while it was still dark.

Reeva: “Can’t you sleep?”

Blade Runner: ‘”No, I can’t.”

bla11Pistorius then said he stepped out to the balcony and when he returned to the darkened bedroom he heard the telltale noise from the bathroom that changed everything.

Blade Runner: “That’s the moment that everything changed.”

Pistorius said he was afraid as he made his way to the bathroom, walking only on his stumps because he had removed his prosthetic legs before going to bed. He said that as he approached the bathroom he was screaming for Steenkamp to call the police.

“I wasn’t sure if someone was going to come out the toilet and attack me,” he said. Pistorius testified that he heard a door slam. That was “confirmation” that there was an intruder in the bathroom. He then fired four shots at the toilet cubicle with his 9 mm pistol, shots that killed Reeva Sttenkamp

bla13Pistorius stated that he then searched for Steenkamp in his bedroom, patting the bed where he expected to find her. When she wasn’t there, he thought she might be hiding and searched on the floor next to the bed and also behind the curtains.

“It was at that point … that it first dawned on me that maybe it was Reeva in the toilet. I don’t think I’ve ever screamed like that … I was crying out for the Lord to help me, I was crying out for Reeva.”

Much of the case against Pistorius is based on the fact that neighbors of Pistorius who testified on behalf of the prosecution said they heard a woman’s terrified screams before and during what sounded like gunshots. But some also said they thought they heard a man’s voice. The defense is contending that the neighbors heard only Pistorius screaming and not a woman.

It was high drama in Judge Thokozile Masipa’s courtroom. At one point on Tuesday, Pistorius left briefly, shed his dark suit, and returned in a white shirt and shorts, clothes similar to those he was wearing when he shot Steenkamp.

bla12Prompted by his lawyer, during some of his testimony, Pistorius then took off his prosthetics and stood on his stumps by the bullet-marked toilet door, which, in true macabre fashion, has kept faithful vigil in the courtroom through much of the trial. Clearly defense attorney Roux was working overtime to demonstrate the Olympian’s vulnerability at the time of the shooting.

After Pistorius couldn’t find Steenkamp in his bedroom, he realized she might be behind the bathroom door.

bla5“At that point all I wanted to do was just look inside to see if it was Reeva,” Pistorius said. He voice started to shake and then the tears came to this most emotional of men and then he broke down in sobs.

I sat over Reeva and I cried,” said Pistorius describing how he broke open the stall door and found his bloodied girlfriend slumped over in the in the cubicle. “I don’t know how long I was there for.”

It is no secret that Pistorius has often shown emotion during the course of the trial. He has buried his head in his hands, he has wept and even vomited on a couple of occasions. Tuesday’s outburst was on another level and it forced a brief adjournment. Pistorius was too distraught to stand up when the judge left the courtroom. He slumped in his seat and started to wail and his faithful brother and sister went over to comfort him. After a while he left the courtroom through a side door, still crying.

bla8Tuesday marked the first time that the Blade Runner, who faces a life sentence with no parole for at least 25 years if convicted of premeditated murder, has spoken publicly about the details of the fatal shooting. Prosecutors, naturally, are calling his story an intricate lie and maintain he intentionally killed his 29-year-old girlfriend after an argument.

bla6When the judge returned to the courtroom, she ended proceedings for the day. By then the Blade Runner had also returned, jaw clenched, to the witness box. He was composed when he left the court and walked to a waiting vehicle.

Pistorius was born without fibula bones because of a congenital defect. His legs were amputated when he was 11 months old. The multiple Paralympic medalist ran on blades made of carbon-fiber. He had to fight for permission to compete in the 2012 London Olympics where he didn’t win a medal.

*     *     *     *     *

bla9The Blade Runner’s remorse may be beyond anything I have ever witnessed. He is like some mother from the Bible who has lost her children and cannot be comforted. In a sense, perhaps, he is doing the mourning for both him and his deceased girlfriend.

Does this mean he didn’t intentionally shoot her? Not at all. I don’t know if he shot her and I have a cloying sense that he will be found guilty by the judge who in the South African system serves as both judge and jury. But I hope I am wrong. It took this horrible tragedy for the Blade Runner to take off his blades and become the fragile and all too real individual who brought proceedings to a sudden halt on Tuesday in the Pretoria courtroom.

 

Can South Carolina Sheriff “Big Sam” Parker Survive the Chesterfield County Inquisition?

$
0
0

commentary by Patrick H. Moore

I have the feeling that day-by-day many of us, whether we like it or not, are growing increasingly fond of former Chesterfield County sheriff Big Sam Parker. And those of us who are developing this grudging fondness for the embattled lawman may be — at least in some cases — the same people who harbor a violent distaste for Sheriff Joe Arpaio out in Maricopa County. Yet here’s Big Sam getting indicted by a grand jury of his peers while Sheriff Joe continues to run roughshod over decency, morality and the American way with apparently the full support of his constituency.

Yet observe the evidence. Sheriff Joe makes his county jail inmates live in his tent city and wear pink underwear; former Sheriff Sam allows his favorite inmates lots of freedom and even lets them have real sex with real women on occasion. Now that’s my kind of sheriff.

aam11

Yet facts are facts and the key fact here is  that Big Sam is fighting for his freedom before a jury of his peers. Monday was jury selection day and it was no easy task because most of the prospective jury pool knew Big Sam personally.

On Tuesday, as if to make up for Monday’s halting progress, things moved along at a good clip. Opening statements came and went and fully ten witnesses took their turn in the witness box.

 

WSOCTV News has the story:

AYY4The first witness in the trial, Detective Wayne Jordan, was a deputy Big Sam had hired. While being questioned by the prosecutor, Detective Jordan broke down in tears, telling the court he’d known Parker since he was a young boy playing Little League baseball.

“You don’t want to be here, do you?” the prosecutor asked him.

“In no way, shape or form,” Jordan answered, wiping his eyes with a tissue.

Yet, unless he wanted to perjure himself, Detective Jordan had no choice other than to testify that he’d been asked by Parker numerous times to give guns to people — guns that were property of the sheriff’s office.

“I didn’t ask questions. That’s wasn’t my job,” Jordan said. “I was told to do it, and I did it.”

aamLater in the day, Assistant Attorney General Kinli Abee held up a sniper rifle Parker allegedly gave a man who was scheduled to be trained as a reserve deputy. That man never completed the training and returned the rifle after three weeks.

Another exhibit for the jury’s edification was a pistol Sheriff Sam allegedly gave Derick Outen, who testified that Parker gave it to him as payment for wiring his house. According to Outen, Big Sam told him that he couldn’t pay him, but he could give him the gun to “make it better.”

Keeping it real, we must admit that this is gun country. Although Parker distributing the firearms to these men was clearly not a stroke of genius, I hardly find it surprising.

Where Sheriff Sam may have really messed up, though, was with inmates, William Skipper and Mike Lee. The special perks they allegedly received included letting them drive department vehicles and live outside the jail. They also got to shop, eat out and vacation with Parker and his family wearing street clothes (gasp), and had access to alcohol and women. (Sounds like a pretty good life. Oh, I forgot. They’re supposed to be in jail.) The indictment alleges that neither man had much supervision while being constructively held in the Chesterfield County jail.

aam7Assistant Attorney General Abee explained:

“If you were sent here to Chesterfield County and you were one of Sam Parker’s inmates, well, you got all the freedoms you wanted as long as you worked for them,” she informed the jury in her opening statement.

Derick Outen, who appears to be one of Sam’s many cronies, testified that he saw inmate Mike Lee doing various jobs at Parker’s home.

“I know Mike was doing some cleaning, and that he was helping paint, and was assisting in putting down a floor,” he said. (What wrong with having these inmates perform these constructive tasks? I don’t imagine there’s much meaningful work at the county jail unless you consider mopping floors meaningful.)

In his opening statement, Sam’s lawyer, Greg Harris, said that the jury could not find Sam guilty of corruption unless they were convinced he was dishonest which he did not anticipate.

“Sam Parker is incapable of dishonesty,” said Attorney Harris.

aam13Harris strikes me as one of those clever country lawyers. He made the rather convincing argument that Parker was a small-town sheriff with a limited budget. Therefore, he had no choice but to improvise to equip his deputies properly and protect them. Harris said the sheriff never took a dime from county taxpayers. Then Harris described his goal to the jury.

“It’s my job to help you put Sam Parker back in the sheriff’s job in Chesterfield County, where he ought to be. This is a man who’s been shot once, stabbed twice, and beaten several times, in the line of duty.”

It’s time for the citizens of Chesterfield County to vote for Sheriff again. The primaries are coming up and although it may be wishful thinking on Big Sam’s part, his name is on the June ballot.

The trial is expected to last into next week. Parker faces five counts of misconduct in office, embezzlement and furnishing contraband to inmates.

*     *     *     *     *

ayy3How can you not root for this guy? To add to the stew, he bears a strong resemblance to Ernest Borgnine or even Rod Steiger when seen from a certain angle. I don’t have a strong feeling on which way this one is going to go. But as the oracle, Rick Stack, pointed out, even if Big Sam is convicted on some of these counts, he may still get probation. I mean what are they going to do? Lock him up in his own county jail? Of course, if they did, Sam probably wouldn’t suffer that much because his charisma would pull him through.

Carlos Castaneda’s Sex-and-Suicide Cult, and the Witches Who Disappeared!

$
0
0

by BJW Nashe

Carlos Castaneda’s journey from anthropology student to famous author to New Age cult leader makes for a strange tale that is far more disturbing than anything found in his bestselling books.

At the peak of his career, Castaneda crossed over an invisible line. He turned his back on the clear light of humane, rational thought, and stepped into a shadowy realm of manipulation, secrecy, and lies. It’s tempting to compare this to the metaphorical leap into the abyss that figures so heavily in his writings. Yet Castaneda’s real-life leap had consequences that were quite different from the magical escapades depicted in his writing. Once he became rich and famous and began facing scrutiny, Castaneda shunned the limelight and spent the next two-and-a-half decades pursuing a bizarre alternative lifestyle largely hidden from the public. He proclaimed himself a shaman and a sorcerer and assumed the role of a mysterious guru surrounded by a group of close followers.

Carlos4When Castaneda passed away in 1998, several of his disciples simply disappeared. To this day, no one knows what happened to them. Since then, others from Castaneda’s inner circle have spoken out about their experiences with “the Nagual.” A highly complex, sinister, and sleazy portrait of the man has now emerged. The most detailed source of information is a memoir published by Amy Wallace (daughter of novelist Irving Wallace) in 2003 called Sorcerer’s Apprentice: My Life with Carlos CastanedaRobert Marshall’s discussion of Castaneda’s dark legacy in a 2007 article for Salon.com is also very informative, drawing on both Wallace’s book and interviews with other insiders who knew Castaneda well. We are ultimately left with a lasting image of Castaneda as a creepy cult leader who manipulated and controlled his closest female followers — known as “the witches” — to such an extent that they may have been led to end their own lives.

 

Stopping the World

What we know of Carlos Castaneda’s life prior to his meteoric rise to fame is fairly unremarkable. He was born on December 25, 1925 in Cajamarca, Peru. He immigrated to the United States in the early 1950s and became a naturalized citizen in 1957. In January 1960, he married Margaret Runyan. On August 12, 1961, Margaret gave birth to a son named Carlton Jeremy (“C.J.”) Castaneda. Carlos supposedly divorced Margaret in 1973, although records indicate they remained legally married throughout Castaneda’s life.

Carlos2As a young man, Castaneda enrolled in UCLA to study ethnography. He may have dropped out for a while — there are conflicting reports on his education — but records show that he graduated with a B.A. in anthropology in 1962. He went on to pursue a doctorate degree at UCLA, continuing his anthropology studies. Post-graduate education in California in the 1960s could be pretty free-wheeling. Castaneda was able to take advantage of this by reading widely in various esoteric disciplines and making frequent trips to the desert to conduct research. It was during his grad student years that Castaneda decided to start writing about his “apprenticeship” with a Yaqui Indian sorcerer named Don Juan Matus, whom he claimed to have met while immersing himself in the rich lore surrounding psychoactive plants in the Sonora Desert. Castaneda aspired to be a “psychedelic scholar” loosely modeled after Aldous Huxley, whose book The Doors of Perception was very influential at the time.

Castaneda’s first book, The Teachings of Don Juan: A Yaqui Way of Knowledge, was published  in 1968 by the UC Press, which led to a book deal with Simon and Schuster. Castaneda followed his debut with two further texts, A Separate Reality (1971) and Journey to Ixtlan (1973). All three books were recognized as anthropological field studies, and marketed as popular non-fiction. Journey to Ixtlan was submitted as a doctoral thesis, for which Castaneda received a Ph.D. in 1973. The UCLA faculty were not the only ones impressed with Carlos’s writing. The books found a large audience with counter-culture types — which was a thriving market back in the early 1970s. Scores of long-haired college students, hippie travelers, metaphysical seekers, and dabblers in the occult found Castaneda’s books to be irresistible — a kind of intellectual catnip. These books seemed to be tailor-made to fit their various preoccupations.

The TeachingsThe popularity of Castaneda’s early work is not difficult to understand. A talented storyteller blessed with natural wit and charisma, Carlos also had just enough erudition to be dangerous. His first-person accounts of traveling to the Sonora to become initiated into the magical world of Don Juan and his fellow sorcerers make for compelling reading. The desert setting is rendered in vivid detail, the prose is crisp and clear, and the characters are alternately fascinating, eccentric, and menacing. Most important, the subject matter is mind-blowing — a philosophical walk on the wild side, in which the narrator is taught to “stop the world” by breaking free from his habitual ways of thinking and perceiving. Stopping the world allows him to enter another dimension of reality — the “nagual” — that is filled with supernatural intensity. Becoming a “warrior” in this psychic zone involves various outlandish activities such as ingesting powerful hallucinogens, learning to control dreams,  talking to luminous coyotes and dogs, and turning into a crow and flying through the desert sky.

The star of the show is Don Juan Matus, who comes across as a psychedelic Native American zen master with a sharp occult edge. The world of sorcery is fraught with peril, often a life-and-death struggle against powerful dark forces. Yet Don Juan’s teachings contain a strong current of anarchic humor. The second book (A Separate Reality) opens with the narrator “Carlos” paying a visit to Don Juan in order to present him with a copy of the first book, which he is immensely proud to have authored. Don Juan declines the gift, suggesting that it be used as toilet paper instead. Then a new cycle of grueling apprenticeship begins, even more intense than the last time. Once again, Carlos’s mind must be blown to smithereens in order to obtain true visionary power.

 

Becoming Inaccessible 

Castaneda’s books would go on to sell more than ten million copies during his lifetime (and they are still selling today). He received glowing reviews from the literary establishment. Notable anthropologists from the nation’s top universities praised his work. With fame and success came heightened scrutiny, however. In 1973, Time Magazine ran an article by Sandra Burton that raised serious questions about the details of Castaneda’s biography and the credibility of his apprenticeship with Don Juan Matus. Richard De Mille (son of film director Cecil B. De Mille)thoroughly investigated Castaneda and published a book called Castaneda’s Journey: The Power and the Allegory  that declared the Don Juan books to be fraudulent — little more than a clever hoax. De Mille reviewed library records at UCLA to demonstrate that Castaneda imported the content of Don Juan’s teachings from a slew of historical and metaphysical texts. Castaneda’s true adventure, claimed De Mille, occurred not in the Sonora desert, but among the stacks of the university library. De Mille also argued that Castaneda’s details regarding the Yaqui Indians of Northern Mexico were insufficient or inaccurate. Most damaging, in the eyes of many, is De Mille’s assertion that Yaqui Indians do not use peyote in magical rituals as depicted by Castaneda.

HuxleyIn hindsight, it is hard to believe that anyone — including the faculty at UCLA — considered Castaneda’s writing to be literally true. The books might be based in part on field research and interviews with Native Americans. They may contain a certain level of poetic or spiritual “truth.” So does Paradise Lost, yet few of us today would claim that Milton’s masterpiece is a “true story.” These days, hardly anyone considers Castaneda’s stories about Don Juan Matus to be pure non-fiction — no matter where they are shelved in bookstores. Yet Castaneda’s books remain popular works of metaphysical literature that sit comfortably alongside Gurdjieff, Crowley, Huxley, and Ouspensky.

As criticism of his work intensified, Castaneda stopped talking to the press. He did not retreat from public life altogether; there were still parties to go to, and people to meet. After the Time article in 1973, however, Carlos gave no more interviews, refused to be photographed or filmed, and would not allow his voice to be recorded. He also forbade those close to him from speaking to the press or discussing him in any way without his approval. In a telling move, Castaneda also severed all ties with his estranged wife Margaret Runyan and their son C.J.

Castaneda had no interest in defending his writing as literature. He has been described as a trickster who pulled off the perfect hoax, because he never admitted to any fault whatsoever. In fact, he remained committed to the illusion of truth perpetuated by the hoax. He wanted people to think he had been initiated into a world of secret knowledge. He wanted to be recognized as an actual sorcerer. And he craved followers who believed in his magic. Since he was a famous figure, there were plenty of fans willing to sit at the feet of the master. Castaneda began referring to himself as “the Nagual” — as if he were a supernatural being with all-knowing powers. He was such a compelling fabulist that he apparently brainwashed himself into believing his own BS.

 

Erasing Personal History 

TensegrityCastaneda continued publishing books throughout the 1970s and 80s. He also began organizing his followers and channeling their activities in certain strategic directions. Along with the philosophy presented in his writings, he also began promoting a spiritual practice called “Tensegrity,” which is best described as a movement technique somewhat similar to Tai chi. Carlos claimed the technique had been passed down through 25 generations of Toltec shamans. Castaneda established a Los Angeles-based corporation called Cleargreen, which promoted Tensegrity through workshops, seminars, and instructional videos. People paid up to $1200 to attend sessions where Castaneda and his disciples would speak and answer questions, while  Tensegrity demonstrations were performed by black-clad acolytes called “chacmools.” Books and videos were on sale, along with T-shirts emblazoned with the slogan, “Self Importance Kills — Do Tensegrity.”  The workshops were quite successful, often selling out. Castaneda was a marketable brand. (It should be noted that Cleargreen’s outreach continues to this day, with locations in Southern California, Europe, and Latin America.)

Behind the scenes, life at Castaneda’s compound on Pandora Avenue in Westwood was growing increasingly strange. At the core of the Nagual’s inner circle — which numbered up to two dozen people at any given time — was a group of intensely devoted young women who were all at one time or another romantically linked to Castaneda. They were referred to as “the witches.” Once they were lured into Castaneda’s orbit, he instructed them to change their names and cease all contact with their former friends and families. Then they were subjected to various methods of control: hypnosis, verbal and emotional abuse, mind games, bizarre rituals, dubious teachings, and sexual domineering. The women were forbidden from exhibiting any signs of illness, should they ever become sick. They began dressing in a similar style of black clothes and sporting the same short, dyed blonde haircuts. They each claimed to have been instructed by Don Juan Matus in the desert. Two of them were directed by Carlos to write their own books about these “apprenticeships.” The primary task of the witches, however, was recruiting new female members for the Nagual to share his unique magic with.

The WitchesWithin the group, three women were particularly close to Castaneda: Taisha Abelar, Florinda Donner-Grau, and Carol Tiggs. Tiggs at one point defected from the cult, but was eventually lured back by Carlos. Amalia Marquez, who served as president of Cleargreen Corporation, and Kylie Lundahl, a Tensegrity instructor, were also key figures in the Nagual’s inner circle. The individual with the strangest role of all in Castaneda’s inner circle was Patricia Partin, also known as “the Blue Scout.”

Patricia Partin grew up in LaVerne, California. After dropping out of Bonita High School during her junior year, she worked as a waitress for a while, and then at 19 got married to an aspiring filmmaker named Mark Silliphant. At some point during their courtship, Silliphant introduced Partin to Castaneda in 1977. Just 19 days into their marriage, Partin left her new husband and went to live with Carlos. She paid one last visit to her mother, during which she refused to pose for a family photograph. She never spoke to her mother again.

Blue ScoutCastaneda renamed her Partin Nury Alexander. He also referred to her as “Claude,” or the Blue Scout. Young and attractive, she soon enjoyed a privileged status as one of his favorite disciples. Carlos claimed she possessed a rare energy that was “barely human.” In an exceedingly odd move, Castaneda officially adopted her in 1995, then explained to the other witches that he had “conceived her with Carol Tiggs in the nagual.” Carlos evidently enjoyed the conceptual incest involved in the adoption arrangement. Within the group, Partin was frequently infantilized. New cult members would be assigned the task of playing dolls with her. Castaneda at times deferred to her judgment regarding serious spiritual matters. He told the group that the Blue Scout had convinced him to start Cleargreen. He liked to use her special status as leverage in the mind games he played with the others.

 

 

The Sorcerer’s Apprentice

Amy Wallace, who was closely associated with the group during the early 1990s, has provided us with the clearest picture of what life was like in Castaneda’s cult, with his harem of witches and his adopted daughter, the Blue Scout.

Castaneda first met Amy through her father, novelist Irving Wallace, who was friendly with the younger author. Carlos would often stop by the Wallace home in Los Angeles. Shortly after Irving’s death in 1990, Amy — who was then living in Berkeley — received a phone call from Castaneda in which he said that her father had visited him in a dream, saying that he was trapped inside the Wallace’s house, and needed Amy and Carlos to free him. (This pickup line probably only works if you are a famous New Age author.) Amy agreed to meet up with Castaneda in LA, and the seduction was underway. He told her he hadn’t had sex in the last 20 years (!), and soon persuaded her to join him in bed for a mystical experience. When she worried about possible pregnancy (the Nagual did not use birth control), Castaneda exclaimed, “Me make you pregnant? Impossible! The Nagual’s sperm isn’t human … Don’t let any of the Nagual’s sperm out, nena. It will burn away your humanness.” The vasectomy he’d undergone years earlier was never mentioned.

Amy WallaceThe courtship with Amy lasted for several weeks, and led directly into mind games and manipulation. At one point, Castaneda told her they were “energetically married.” However, when he noticed her checking the street signs around the compound — as if trying to get her bearings — he flew into a rage and banished her back to Berkeley. When she called on the phone, Carlos refused to speak to her. The witches instructed her to “let go of her attachments.” So she got rid of her pet cats. Then Carlos told her she was “an egotistical, spoiled Jew” who should “go get a job at McDonald’s.” After six months of this treatment, she was finally allowed to return.

Such expulsions were common within the cult, and could occur arbitrarily, without rhyme or reason. If the Blue Scout didn’t like you, obviously you were toast. As in most cult situations, random exercises of power were used to keep the Nagual’s followers fearful and subservient. The obvious question is, why would anyone, including Amy Wallace, ever want to return? Why would anyone stick around in the first place?

We can answer this question in four ways — personal, social, philosophical, and psychological. First, Castaneda could be a charming and charismatic leader, when it suited his purposes. His personal magnetism was augmented by an aura of genius and fame. Certain people were easily seduced by him. Second, group members enjoyed a sense of close family connection that may have been absent from their lives before. Being part of a group — even a dysfunctional, abusive group — is sometimes viewed as preferable to alienation. Third, for people who are seeking something deeper and more meaningful than a normal nine-to-five existence in the business world, the Nagual’s spiritual philosophy and sexual games provided a clear alternative. Fourth, people who join cults often experience — at least temporarily — a sense of joy in being liberated from the responsibilities of decision-making. Freedom can be a burden. When someone else — a charismatic leader — is calling all the shots, one can be carefree in one’s subservience.

So there were certain “benefits” gained from living in Castaneda’s cult. As far as cults go, the benefits of Cleargreen were notable. Still, most of us would soon find these benefits seriously overshadowed by the horrors involved. In a 2012 interview with the Examiner, Amy Wallace explained that her passionate love affair with Carlos was initially intoxicating, yet soon devolved into abuse and humiliation. He berated her in front of the others for being “fat,” even though she was a petite woman who wore a size zero. He blamed her for “killing” him. He flipped out when he discovered that she was taking Prozac. “He believed he was cursed forever because his penis had entered a Prozac-contaminated body.” She witnessed him expel members from the group for drinking, smoking pot, and for getting sick or injured. Meanwhile, Carlos was always on the prowl for nubile young women, sometimes engaging in activities that bordered on kidnapping. In hindsight, it’s surprising that criminal charges were never brought against him. In writing her memoir, Wallace recalled that at one point she felt so tormented that she considered suicide. “Just remembering how close I came still terrifies me. It was horrific to write about.”

Amy Wallace has published several other books on various topics, yet she received her highest praise from readers and reviewers alike for telling her story about life with Carlos Castaneda. She insightfully describes both the seductive qualities that lead people to follow cult leaders, and the nightmare that awaits them once they get caught up in the lifestyle. “My book is very much a warning,” she says.

 

A Leap into the Void 

In 1997, Castaneda was diagnosed with liver cancer. The diagnosis was kept secret from everyone except the core group of witches, because illness was not supposed to be part of the sorcerer’s playbook. The seminars and workshops continued on as if nothing was wrong. Meanwhile the witches privately supervised traditional and alternative treatments for the Nagual.

Separate RealityWith his health declining, Castaneda rarely left the compound. Many of the witches purchased guns, according to Carol Tiggs. This is not a good sign for any cult, since it could lead to random violence or a Branch Davidian-style Waco conflagration. Another bad sign is when the cult leader is bedridden with a morphine drip, gazing at the flickering images of war videos on the TV/VCR, while his closest followers are busy burning his papers. Taisha Abelar was drinking heavily, yet she told Amy Wallace it didn’t matter anymore. “I’m not in any danger of becoming an alcoholic now,” she said, “because I’m leaving. So, it’s too late.” Wallace figures that this was Abelar’s way of indicating that her own death was near.

An end-of-the-world vibe permeated the group. Wallace had another revealing conversation during this tense time period. Tensegrity instructor Kylie Lundahl told her, “If I don’t go with him, I’ll do what I have to do… It’s too late for you and me to remain in the world — I think you know exactly what I mean.”

SkeletonIn April 1998, the witches and other members of the inner circle were packing up the Castaneda compound. A week later, the Nagual died at age 72. He was cremated at the Culver City mortuary. No one knows where his ashes ended up. Within a few days, Florinda Donner-Grau, Taisha Abelar, Patricia Partin, Kylie Lundahl, and Amalia Marquez had their phones disconnected. Then they all vanished, leaving no word with anyone as to their whereabouts (at least, not that we know of). A few weeks later, Partin’s red Ford Escort was found abandoned in Death Valley. Her sun-bleached skeleton would be discovered five years later in the desert.

Within the greater community of Cleargreen associates and followers, few knew that Castaneda was dead. Yet rumors quickly spread, leading to a sense of growing despair. Still, the workshops continued. Carol Tiggs assumed a leadership role within the corporation. She told one member of the inner circle that she was supposed to have“gone with them,” but “a non-decision decision” had kept her here to run the show. Tiggs banned all grieving and mourning within Cleargreen. Many reportedly took to drowning their sorrows in alcohol and drugs. Some contemplated suicide in order to “get close to Carlos.”

When news of Castaneda’s death was finally made public two months after the fact, Cleargreen members stopped answering their phones. A brief statement was soon posted on the web site claiming that “… Carlos Castaneda left the world the same way that his teacher, don Juan Matus did: with full awareness.”

TimeNobody knows for sure what happened to Partin, the Blue Scout, in Death Valley. Nobody knows the fate of other three women closest to Castaneda who disappeared shortly after his passing. Some Cleargreen people think they are still alive, and have started over in a new setting, with new identities. Most people familiar with the story think they committed suicide. Without the Nagual, they saw no point in going on. Perhaps they had formed a suicide pact. Maybe the Nagual knew all about it. Followers had frequently heard Castaneda and the witches talking about suicide — about “making the leap” together. The path of the Warrior included choosing one’s own death. Carlos reportedly once sent the Blue Scout out to the desert to locate possible suicide locations.

There is no record with the LAPD or FBI of any investigation into at least three of the disappearances — Donner-Grau, Abelar, and Lundahl. No one reported them missing, since they had been estranged from their families for years.

There is an open investigation into the Amalia Marquez case, due to the efforts of her brother Luis. He claims the LAPD ignored his requests for assistance until the skeletal remains of the fifth missing cult member — Patricia Partin — were discovered in Death Valley in 2003 and positively identified in 2006 using DNA testing. Still, Luis Marquez claims the LAPD has been reluctant to visit Cleargreen or question anyone there about possible foul play. When Luis contacts Cleargreen headquarters himself, he is told that the missing women are “traveling.”

In a related incident in 2002, a woman named Janice Emery from Taos, New Mexico, who was a Cleargreen follower and workshop attendee, jumped to her death in the Rio Grande gorge. According to the Santa Fe New Mexican, Emery was suffering from cancer. One of her friends told the newspaper that she ended her life because she “wanted to be with Castaneda’s people.” Another friend said: “I think she was really thinking she could fly off.”

 

A Different Sort of Leap

Carlos3An astonishing fact to ponder: so many organizations devoted to spiritual well-being — from mega churches to fringe cults — seem to share a very disturbing characteristic: domination, control, and abuse of women. We see this feature in certain fundamentalist denominations of Christianity and Islam. We see it in the Church of Scientology. We know it was all-too apparent in the Manson Family, the People’s Temple at Jonestown, and the Branch Davidian compound at Waco. I’m sure there are other examples. In this sense, Castaneda’s cult is not exceptional or unique. It fits into a general pattern of misogyny and sexual subjugation seen in many other faith-based institutions and groups.

The domination and control of women is so prevalent in these organizations that one wonders whether it is more than just an ugly tendency or side-effect. Is it too much of a leap to argue that the domination of women just might be the primary goal or mission of the leaders of these groups? Are all of the mystical teachings and metaphysical doctrines just a smokescreen for the true objective? Is religion sometimes just a convenient way for men to control other people — in particular, women? It certainly starts to look that way, when we consider the case of Carlos Castaneda, AKA the Nagual.

Bestiality Is Legal in the Same States That Ban Same-Sex Marriage!

$
0
0

by Robert Emmett Murphy, Jr.

The subject of this post is the entrenchment of sexual perversion in American law and how that is reflected in the ideological make-up of the various regions of this great but threatened nation. I am talking specifically about Bestiality, which is legal in 36% of American states.

best4Bestiality is a misdemeanor in the following 19 states (or territories):

Alaska; California; Colorado; Connecticut; Florida; Iowa; Kansas; Louisiana; Maine; Maryland; Minnesota; Nebraska; New York; North Dakota; Oregon; Pennsylvania; Utah; Virgin Islands; and Wisconsin

 

 

Bestiality is charged as a felony in these 16 states (or territories) :

Arizona; Deleware; Georgia; Illinois; Indiana; Massachusetts; Michigan; Mississippi; North Carolina; Oklahoma; Puerto Rico; Rhode Island; South Carolina; South Dakota; Tennessee; and Washington

 

Bestiality is completely legal in the following 18 states, districts, and territories:

Alabama; Arkansas; Washington, D.C.; Guam; Hawaii; Kentucky; Montana; Nevada; New Hampshire; New Jersey; New Mexico; Ohio; Texas; Vermont; Virginia; West Virginia; and Wyoming

 

homeThe ideological thrust of these Bestiality Fifth Columnists is obvious when one compares where this perversion is accepted to those places where Same-Sex Marriages are banned. In 55% of the states wherein Bestiality is legal, Same Sex Marriage is not. The states which do not criminalize Bestiality, yet ban Same Sex Marriage are as follows:

Kentucky; Montana; New Jersey; Nevada; Ohio; Texas; Virginia; West Virginia; and Wyoming (Note: New Jersey does permit Civil Unions.)

 

In clear contrast, Bestiality is illegal in the 12 states where Same Sex Marriage is accepted. These states are as follows:

California; Connecticut; Delaware; Iowa; Maine; Maryland; Massachusetts; Minnesota; New York; Rhode Island; Vermont; and Washington

Only 3 states do not ban Bestiality but do endorse Same Sex Marriage, thus straying from the above pattern. These states are:

New Hampshire; New Mexico; and Vermont (in the case of New Mexico, there are no laws on the books either endorsing or banning Same Sex Marriage so it’s actual sexual/ideological orientation is currently ambiguous).

*     *     *     *     *

So we are left with a burning question. Is there a correlation between being pro-Bestiality and rabidly Homophobic? Is it possible that approving of or actively practicing Bestiality turns one into a Homophobe?  The statistics suggest one, or the other, or both. :-)

 

Click here to view other posts by Robert Emmett Murphy, Jr.:

George Zimmerman Trial: Inadmissible Evidence Cuts Both Ways

Let the Police Do Their Work, Buddy: That Means You!

Why the Case Against George Zimmerman Is Strong Enough for a Conviction

Heroic Pennsylvania Teens Save Lives in High School Mass Stabbing

$
0
0

commentary by Patrick H. Moore

Pennsylvania teen Gracey Evans was walking down the hallway with her best friend at Franklin Regional High School in Murrysville, Pa., on Wednesday morning when she saw blood, writes Sebastian Murdock of the Huffington Post 

It was the beginning of what is certainly one of the largest mass stabbings in American public school history. 23 people — 21 students, a security guard, and the suspect – were left injured by the black-clad stabber who arrived on campus prior to first period on Tuesday armed with two 10-inch kitchen knives with straight blades.

cap2Thus began what will prove to be a dark and unforgettable day for the 17-year-old Gracey who found herself right in the middle of 16-year-old suspect Alex Hribal’s crazed attack on his classmates at Franklin Regional High School in Murrysville, PA, 15 miles from Pittsburg in Westmoreland County.

Gracey described her near-death experience when interviewed by the Huffington Post. “I was walking back from my friend’s locker when I heard a girl say to a kid, ‘Hey, you’re bleeding.’”

At that moment, Gracey’s friend performed the ultimate sacrifice, grabbing Evans and throwing himself in front of her.

“He blocked me from getting stabbed, and got stabbed in the back. I watched him fall. After that, I saw two other people get stabbed.”

cap8Evans told Huff Post that she saw the suspect, who is now in custody, wearing his black clothes while wielding his two long knives.

As Gracey’s best friend crumpled to the ground, she reacted in the only way she knew how — by letting out a “blood-curdling scream.”

A nearby student pulled the fire alarm and panic ensued. A teacher ushered students into the safety of a classroom and locked the door.

Evans’ best friend was bleeding from his back. Even worse off was a student from her math class, lying on the floor bleeding profusely from what looked like a deep stab wound on his lower right torso.

“The teacher told [the student] to sit up, but I knew that wasn’t right so I told him to lay down,” Evans said.

Students raced to grab paper towels and handed them off to Gracey who applied pressure to stanch the flow of blood coming from the student’s wounds. Her hands were quickly soaked with blood as she fought to save him.

cap4When EMTs arrived, they relieved Gracey and rushed the injured student to ER. The victim’s sister has tweeted that the boy is still in critical condition.

Then Evans turned back to her friend, who was screaming in pain.

“I held his hand and didn’t let go. I kept asking him questions like ‘What is your life’s dream?’ to get him talking. I got him water. My other friend applied pressure to his back wound because I was talking him through the situation.”

When asked what gave her the strength to get going, Evans said simply: “He saved my life, so I saved his.” 

According to his mother, the boy who was stabbed in the torso broke down in tears when heard what Evans and the others had done to save his life.

“All through this I had blood on my hands, blood on my jeans,” said Gracey. “I’m still shaking from the experience. I was crying, I was shaking. I couldn’t believe that it happened at Franklin Regional.” 

capShaken up though she was, Evans, who is on the honor guard in her marching band and carries the school banner, is an avid superhero fan. She loves Captain America and when her parents heard the news, her father said while the tears flowed: “You’re my Captain America.”

Gracey’s father, Bill Evans was formerly a Franklin Regional School Board director. Bill told The Huffington Post that the school has always been rigorous in its emergency management planning and employs a resource officer with the Murrysville Police Department.

“People didn’t want [a school resource officer] in our school district, but this shows that a quick response is the best response,” said Bill. “They were able to correct this situation — along with Assistant Principal Sam King — quickly.”

Then Bill got choked up when asked about his daughters heroics:

“It brings a tear to my eye. Not only did someone step in front of her, but she stepped up and helped others. We’re very proud, and it’s very humbling.”

*     *     *     *     *

Alex HribalAfter being taken into custody, the suspect Alex Hribal was transported to an area hospital for treatment of injuries to his hands.

“In all likelihood, he will be charged as an adult,” Westmoreland County District Attorney John Peck told reporters.

After the incident, at a press conference at a nearby junior his school, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett spoke. In his remarks, he included heartfelt words of praise for both students and staff:

“There are a number of heroes…a number of them students.”  (And Super Girl Gracey Evans and her best friend are certainly among them.)

Then the Governor addressed the 800 pound gorilla in the room.

“These incidents clearly reflect mental health issues that need to be engaged and studied,” said the Republican governor said. “I think we should think about this: What made this young man decide to get up today and do this.”

*     *     *     *     *

Fortunately, no matter how frustrated I get as I march through my demanding day, I never fantasize about wandering over to the nearby high school and bringing it to its knees with a couple of 10-inch blades or even an AK-47. I guess I’m lucky that way.

 


Don’t Crucify Me, Dude! Just Shoot Me Instead! Spartacus and Death by Crucifixion

$
0
0

by Darcia Helle

Death By Crucifixion in the Roman World

According to the Greek historian Herodotus (484 BC – 425 B.C.), crucifixion seems to have originated with the ancient Persians and dates back to at least 700 B.C. The Romans soon adopted and perfected this ancient death penalty.

In the Roman Empire, the method used to carry out a death sentence was dictated by class. The upper class patricians and equestrians were allowed dignity in death. They were given poison, which they used in private. In complete contrast, the slaves were executed publicly using a variety of brutal methods.

In most circumstances, Roman law forbade crucifixion as a punishment for its average citizens. This punishment was reserved for their enemies, rebellious foreigners, citizens who committed treason, and, of course, slaves. In fact, slaves were crucified so frequently that crucifixion became known as the servile supplicium or slaves’ punishment.

 

The Roman View On Crucifixion

 The Romans did not view crucifixion as a “normal” death sentence. Crucifixion was considered humiliating, disgraceful, and obscene. This is why crucifixion was reserved for the lowest class of people and the most despicable crimes. Even under these circumstances, some Romans considered crucifixion uncivilized.

In the first century B.C., Roman philosopher and statesman Marcus Tullius Cicero called crucifixion “the most cruel and disgusting penalty”.

 

Spartacus and the Slave Revolt

cross10Spartacus is perhaps the most famous of all Roman slaves. Information is sparse and sources differ on some points, but all agree that Spartacus was a Thracian (an Indo-European tribe from Thrace) born in 109 BC. Plutarch, a Greek historian from the early AD period, described Spartacus as “a Thracian of Nomadic Stock”. He received training in the Roman army, though it’s unclear whether this was as an auxiliary from the Roman legions or as a captive taken by the legions. Either way, he went from soldier to slave in 73 BC, when he was sold to a Roman citizen, Lentulus Batiatus.

Batiatus was an overseer and trainer  at a school for gladiator slaves 20 miles from Mt. Vesuvius. According to some fictionalized versions of Spartacus’s life, upon being trained for the gladiator ring, Spartacus killed his good friend in a “kill or be killed” battle for the entertainment of the Roman patrician class. Whether or not this is true, there is no doubt that not long after being imprisoned in the gladiator school, Spartacus organized an escape that turned into a riot now known as the Slave Revolt or the cross4Slave Rebellion. Of the 200 gladiators living at the school, only about 70 made it out to the streets. The escaped slaves seized wagons and weaponry, using their gladiator skills to defeat the small army sent to capture them.

Spartacus then led his men on to Mt. Vesuvius, picking up rural slaves along the way. The slaves took a Roman camp, thwarting the Romans’ attempt to stop them. In total, around 70,000 slaves joined Spartacus and his men as they headed into the Alps.

Historians believe Spartacus intended on a quick march of protest before cross2allowing his men to disband and return to their pre-slave homes. Unfortunately, their revolt had earned them too much attention from the Roman Senate, which tasked Marcus Licinius Crassus, the wealthiest man in Rome, with ending the rebellion. Crassus organized 10 legions to block Spartacus and his slaves. In the end, approximately 12,000 slaves were killed in battle. Another 6,000 managed to escape, only to be captured and crucified along the Appian Way, the royal road leading from Capua to Rome.

While Roman leaders and early historians claim Spartacus died in battle, they also agree that his body was never actually found or identified.

 

The Cross

The earliest crucifixion victims are believed to have been nailed or tied to trees. A variety of methods followed. The Romans seem to have standardized the procedure with the use of the cross.

crossSeveral cross varieties were used for crucifixions. The tau, or Saint Anthony’s cross, was made from a horizontal beam fixed at the very top of the vertical piece, forming a T. The second type of a traditional cross was the t-shape, called the Latin cross, in which the horizontal beam was fixed about one-quarter of the way from the top of  the vertical piece. Saint Andrew’s cross consisted of two diagonal beams forming an X. The last type, consisting simply of a vertical wooden stake, was also used in some instances.

 

In AD 70, during the time that Roman General and later Emperor Titus was beating down the Jewish revolt and beginning the siege of Jerusalem, he was crucifying more than 500 Jews each day.

Death’s Sweet Release

cross9Death did not usually come quickly. A healthy person could survive as long as two days on the cross. The victim, always naked, would be taunted and ridiculed by the citizens. Insects would infest the victim’s eyes, mouth, and open wounds. Death was slow, demoralizing, and agonizing.

Proper burials for crucifixion victims were not allowed during the Roman period. The victim would be left on the cross as food for birds of prey and any wild animals that could reach high enough to scavenge from the cross. At times, the bodies of the deceased would be removed from their crosses and simply tossed away as trash.

Constantine, Rome’s first Christian emperor, banned crucifixion in 345 AD.

Crucifixion Today

Most of us in today’s world do not live in fear of crucifixion. You would be forgiven for believing that this gruesome form of torture and execution is no longer practiced. However, you would be wrong.

cross11Crucifixion has been used at various times in many countries from the time of its conception.

Japan adopted the practice during the Age of Civil Wars (1138-1560), which is particularly astounding since they had gone the previous 350 years with no capital punishment at all. Crucifixion is believed to have been introduced to the Japanese along with Christianity. The Japanese also crucified its prisoners during World War II.

Today, both Iran and Sudan continue to use crucifixion as a means of execution.

 

Please click to below to view Darcia’s Helle’s previous posts:

To Burn or Not to Burn? Auto-Da-Fé Is Not Good for Women or Children!

The Disgraceful Entrapment of Jesse Snodgrass: Keep the Narcs Out of Our Schools

Why Should I Believe You? The History of the Polygraph

“Don’t Behead Me, Dude!”: The Story of Beheading and the Invention of the Guillotine

Aileen Wuornos, America’s First High-Profile Female Serial Killer, Never Had a Chance

The Terror of ISO: A Descent into Madness

Al Capone Could Not Bribe the Rock: Alcatraz, Fortress of Doom

Cyberspace, Darknet, Murder-for-Hire and the Invisible Black Machine

darcDarcia Helle lives in a fictional world with a husband who is sometimes real. Their house is ruled by spoiled dogs and cats and the occasional dust bunny.

Suspense, random blood splatter and mismatched socks consume Darcia’s days. She writes because the characters trespassing through her mind leave her no alternative. Only then are the voices free to haunt someone else’s mind.

Join Darcia in her fictional world: www.QuietFuryBooks.com

The characters await you.

Ten Best Serial Killer Quotes: Are These Folks Even Human?

$
0
0

adapted by Patrick H. Moore

“Serial killers have fascinated and disgusted us for generations, their behavior an insane cesspit of deviant acts that we can’t get enough of – whether it be films like Silence of the Lambs or in the news as they dominate the headlines, making us double-check our windows and doors. Here lies a compilation of the most bizarre statements to have passed through the lips of these monstrous beings.”  Brought to us by Astrid Mc Clymont via Listserve

 

florida#10 — Aileen Wuornos

“May your wife and children get raped, right in the ___.” (To the jurors who convicted her.)

Aileen Wuornos entered the world on February 29th 1956 only to be forced into the most turbulent childhood, being forced into acts of incest from an early age. Barely leaving infancy she could be found trading sexual favors for cigarettes and when she was 14 faced the horrendous predicament of being pregnant – with the potential fathers being her brother and her grandfather. Shunned by her family she left home to reside in the nearby woods. She later went on to hitchhike across America working as a prostitute. She was sentenced to death after being convicted of killing seven men. She claimed self defense, stating these men had raped her.

 

fishman#9 — Albert Fish

“I like children they are tasty.”

Born May 19th 1870 Albert Fish was a cannibal and child rapist who boasted to have consumed children in every state. He was also known as The Brooklyn Vampire, the Werewolf of Wysteria and the Moon Maniac. His family had an intense history of mental illness and religious mania and Fish was no exception to the family tradition. From an early age, his pastimes included the consumption of urine and feces, frequenting public baths to watch young boys undress, and writing obscene letters to women he found in the classified ads. While in prison he enjoyed forcing needles into his groin and urinary tract. He was sentenced to death for the kidnap and murder of Grace Budd, deeming the electric chair the greatest sexual thrill imaginable. During his execution the electric chair short circuited due the amount of needles in his body.

 

art#8 — Arthur Shawcross

“She was giving me oral sex, and she got carried away . . . So I choked her.”

Born June 6th 1945 Arthur Shawcross was imprisoned for the manslaughter of two children only to kill eleven more times after his release. Recorded as having an extremely low IQ, somewhere around 86 and 92, he served in the war in Vietnam where he witnessed various atrocities. He was also known as the Genesee Killer where he murdered eleven prostitutes, although the number could be significantly higher. He died at the age of 63 in 2008. There is a youtube clip on Shawcross you can watch here.

 

dennis#7 — Dennis Lynn Rader

“I actually think I may be possessed with demons, I was dropped on my head as a kid.”

Born March 9th 1945 Dennis Lynn Rader killed 10 people is Sedgwick County between 1974 and 1991. The initials BTK became his moniker as he declared in various letters to the local newspapers that they stood for Bind, Torture, Kill. After serving in the Air Force, Rader became a dogcatcher and supervisor for the Compliance Department. He remained at large for so long as his MO differed from victim to victim preventing any links or patterns. He was eventually caught after a familial link was established between semen found at one of the crime scenes and a tissue sample taken from his daughter.

 

carl#6 –  Carl Panzram

“His brains were coming out of his ears when I left him, and he will never be any deader.”

Born June 28th 1891 Panzram was a convicted serial killer, arsonist, thief, burglar and rapist. Panzram confessed to his best friend and prison guard Henry Lesser to 22 murders and of sodomizing over 1000 young males. Of Prussian heritage, young Panzram was raised on a farm in Minnesota then was incarcerated several times for petty crimes. His killing spree began in 1920 when he started to lure young sailors from bars to rape and shoot them.

 

david#5 — David Berkowitz

“The demons wanted my penis.”

Also known as the Son of Sam and the .44 Killer, Berkowitz terrorized New York in the summer of 1976 by shooting 8 people, claiming he was ordered to kill by a demon that possessed his neighbor’s dog. He later went on to claim he only took part in two of the shootings as the others took place at the hands of various members of a Satanic cult he belonged to. However, no other people were convicted of these crimes.

 

ed#4 — Edmund Kemper

“Even when she was dead, she was still bitching at me. I couldn’t get her to shut up!”

Also known as the Co-Ed Killer, Kemper weighing in at 300 lbs and standing 6 ft 9 inches tall, was a convicted serial killer and necrophiliac. His career in killing started at 15 when he killed his grandparents. He was institutionalized in a psychiatric Hospital where he displayed severe sociopathic tendencies. Upon his release he killed and dismembered six female hitchhikers then his mother and her friend before turning himself in two days later.

 

zod#3 — The Zodiac Killer

“If the blue meanies are going to get me they’d better get off their asses and do something.”

The Zodiac Killer operated in California during the late-’60s and ’70s, shooting young couples, the Zodiac Killer became one of the most renowned serial killers of all time due to his taunting, encrypted letters to the press and the fact that he has never been caught. He has been confirmed with seven shootings and five deaths although he boasts 37 killings in his letters. The killer was named the Zodiac by the press as his letters were signed with the hunting symbol of the crosshairs. Numerous attempts by police and amateur investigators have taken place to discover the identity of the killer but the case has remained open since 1969.

 

ted#2 — Ted Bundy

“Sometimes I feel like a vampire.”

Serial killer, rapist, kidnapper and necrophiliac, Theodore Robert Bundy confessed to 30 homicides across seven states during the early-’70s. Due to his handsome looks and charismatic behavior, the clinical psychopath found it easy to lure young women to his car. He often would have a fake plaster cast around his arm and would ask for the assistance of a young girl in helping him carry something to his car. Once there he would trap them inside his VW Beetle which he’s modified by taking out the inside handles rendering the girls’ escape futile. Blondie singer Debbie Harry had a fortunate escape from the killer unlike many of his victims who all resembled his former girlfriend, attractive, petite with mid-length brown hair in a center parting.

 

wayne#1 — John Wayne Gacy

“The only thing they can get me for is running a funeral parlor without a license.”

Executed in 1994, Gacy was convicted of 33 murders and sentenced to death for 12. Gacy lured teenage boys to his home before brutally murdering and raping them. He buried 26 of his victims in the crawl space of his basement, another three he disposed of in a nearby river and the rest were buried in various parts of his property. Also known as the Killer Clown, the name came about because of his charitable fund-raising events where he performed as Pogo the Clown.

 

How Politics Knock on Amanda Knox!

$
0
0

by Michael Mills

Although All Things Crime Blog has posted an article in which, citing his eminence grise, Professor M. Cherif Bousiouni, they suggest that Amanda Knox will not be extradited if her most recent conviction is upheld by the Court of Cassation, I personally doubt that the issue of the possible extradition of Knox is all that relevant, since it appears to me unlikely that Italy will request such extradition even if the conviction of the Nencini court is ultimately upheld.

It seems that since the acquittal of Knox and Sollecito by the Hellmann court in 2011, the whole case has become politicised, a sub-plot in the ongoing attempt of the anti-Berlusconi forces to use the Italian judicial system to overthrow him and the counter-effort of the pro-Berlusconi forces to discredit that system by accusing it of bias and corruption.

boom2The Sollecito family is closely connected to the Berlusconi coalition through Raffaele’s aunt Sara, who is an activist for “Alleanza Nazionale”, the most right-wing Italian political party and a component of Berlusconi’s Forza Italia coalition. Furthermore, Raffaele’s main defence counsel, Giulia Bongiorno, was at the time of the the Massei court trial and during the appeal before the Hellmann court a parliamentary deputy for “Alleanza Nazionale” (she lost her seat early in 2013). Finally, Raffaele’s appeal of his conviction by the Massei court received public support from political supporters of the Berlusconi coalition.

boom7It may well be that anti-Berlusconi elements within the Italian judicial system saw the decision of the Hellmann court acquitting Raffaele Sollecito as a political victory for the Berlusconi supporters who had backed the appeal, and therefore as a political defeat for themselves. That might explain why the Court of Cassation so readily and completely accepted the appeal by Mignini and the Perugia judicial establishment against the judgment of the Hellmann court, even though that appeal was based solely on the same evidence that had been comprehensively discredited by Hellmann.

boom5It is noteworthy that the treatment of Amanda and Raffaele since the annulment of their acquittals stands in stark contrast to their treatment from the time of their arrest by the Perugia police in November 2007 until their acquittal by the Hellmann court in 2011. As the whole world knows they were kept in custody throughout the four-year period of the pre-trial before Micheli, the trial before Massei, and the appeal before Hellmann. The Court of Cassation, when it annulled the acquittals of the Hellman Court, might have ordered Amanda and Raffaele back into custody, but it decided not to do so.

boomFurthermore, even though the Nencini court has re-convicted them, it has not ordered their arrest but left them at liberty, pending their final appeal to the Court of Cassation. That suggests to me that the Italian judicial system is no longer particularly interested in the personal fates of Amanda and Raffaele, no longer intent on ensuring that they serve their sentences, but is concerned only with the political imperative of preserving its reputation against the assault being mounted on it by the Berlusconi forces.

For that reason, I suspect that the Italian authorities will not try all that hard to have Amanda Knox extradited, or to pursue Raffaele if he manages to slip away somewhere. A confirmation by the Court of Cassation of the verdicts of the Nencini court will be primarily a political victory, and that is all that the anti-Berlusconi forces need; enforcement of the sentences of Amanda and Raffaele would be superfluous in this context.

 

Please click below to view Michael Mills’ previous posts on the Knox-Sollecito murder case:

Under Pressure: A. Knox and R. Sollecito Find Meredith Kercher’s Body

How and Why Rudy Guede Was a Lone Wolf Assailant in the Murder of Meredith Kercher

Michael Mills is a retired Australian Public Servant. He is 66 years old, has a keen interest in history and current affairs, and posts regularly on online history forums. Like many, he was appalled by the recent re-conviction of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito, and after substantial intensive research, he has developed the theory of the case that he sets forth herein.

Lovely Drama Teacher Avoids Jail after Robbing the Cradle

$
0
0

commentary by Patrick H. Moore

Suppose your daughter is 26 years old. She is a pretty young woman, a bit on the immature side, who teaches drama at a high school. Your family is not American – you are English and you reside in or around the Bristol, the famous English port city on Merrie Olde England’s southwest coast.

Then, when you least expect it, you discover that your daughter is in serious trouble for having had a 7-month sexual relationship/affair with a 16-year-old student. Based on the evidence, it seems likely that their relationship was entirely consensual. They exchanged more than 12,000 texts and the boy, perhaps proudly, sent explicit naked pictures of himself to your daughter.

BurgessThe whole situation is, of course, humiliating to your entire family and you are probably furious with your daughter for exercising such poor judgment. But in your heart of hearts, do you believe that your daughter’s mistake was sufficiently serious to warrant jail or prison time?

After all, the boy was only one year removed from the legal British age of consent which is 17.

What works against your daughter, in addition to the fact the boy was under-aged, is the fact that your daughter was his teacher. Thus, by throwing caution to the wind, your daughter, whose name is Kelly Burgess, betrayed her obligation as a teacher to instruct and guide her pupils in an appropriate fashion.

kell9Further humiliation stems from the fact that your daughter had sex with the boy at a hotel paid for by their school as part of a training weekend in Warwickshire. This aggravating little piece of evidence was introduced in open court at your daughter’s sentencing in Bristol Crown Court in front of Judge Euan Ambrose.

The judge was informed that Ms. Burgess met the unnamed 16-year-old at a school production in December 2012. Their relationship was launched after the first of the year and apparently reached its first climax during the couple’s ill-fated stopover at the Warwickshire hotel.

They were also apparently nature lovers. In any event, they enjoyed a camping trip in Devon in July.

Crown prosecutor Sam Jones provided this damning evidence to the court:

‘More than 12,000 text messages were found passing between the defendant and the boy over a relatively short period of time. The messages are at times sexually explicit and sometimes intimate.’

It appears that this clearly infatuated couple – despite their age difference – proceeded in more or less the fashion of many young lovers.

kell10Their undoing was their visit to a sexual health clinic in August. For reasons that are somewhat unclear – but certainly suggest that the burden of carrying their guilty secret any longer was more than the boy could bear — the pupil revealed that he was dating his teacher and provided her name.

That was it. Game over. The nurse said she had to report it to the authorities. The boy panicked, ran to his teacher, and returned with her. She then falsely claimed to be a 17-year-old but it didn’t work. The police were informed and Burgess, who worked at a secondary school in Somerset, was arrested later that month.

While being escorted to the police station, Burgess received a text message from the pupil that said: ‘Got the police round, don’t text back don’t be scared just get your story straight when they come to you. I will phone you later.’

The court heard that staff at the school became aware of the relationship and the headteacher was forced to warn the head of the drama department, who in turn spoke to Ms. Burgess.

Prosecutor Jones added: ‘Police spoke to a number of members of staff employed at the school and there was some concern raised by other members of staff about the closeness of relationship of this defendant with students, in particular the use of social media to communicate with students.The headteacher had raised the concern with the head of department who had raised it with the defendant.’

kellMs. Burgess’s barrister, Raymond Tully, did his best to support her: ‘She is not a vamp or cougar, far from it. She is just a young woman somewhat immature, somewhat mixed up who fell in love with the wrong young man.’

From his place of high authority, Judge Euan Ambrose summed it up like this:

‘You make it clear that you were both participating in what you thought was a relationship of equals, but it was quite clearly not a relationship of equals – you were at all times a teacher and he was a pupil.’

Although Ms. Burgess had held out for some time and had only admitted her guilt when confronted with the text messages and the naked pictures of the boy saved on her laptop, she broke down and sobbed hysterically as the judge gave her a 10-month suspended sentence.

kell7Ms. Burgess did say that she was not aware she had done anything illegal as she apparently believed the boy had reached the age of consent and insisted the relationship was ‘loving and on equal terms’.

Her counts of conviction to which she previously confessed are four counts of abuse of trust – sexual activity with a boy aged 13 to 17.

Ms. Burgess, of course, was fired from her job and must register as a sex offender for the next 10 years. She is also prohibited from most forms of contact with children.

While suspending her sentence, Judge Ambrose told Ms. Burgess that losing her teaching career was ‘the greatest punishment in many ways’.

It is noted that a victim impact statement from the pupil, who is now taking his A Levels, said he did not agree with the prosecution.

‘There was absolutely no predatory element whatsoever. It was a consensual relationship.’

*     *     *     *     *

kell5Although Ms. Burgess has escaped without time in custody, her collateral consequences are severe. The loss of her profession as well ten years of sex registration, restrictions on her interactions with children, and the ongoing shame and humiliation certainly constitute substantial punishment. Many, however, feel, the outcome would have been different if the sexes had been reversed and Ms. Burgess had been a man.

The Telegraph’s Cristina Odone  voiced that opinion in stating that the sentence would have been more harsh if “Kelly Burgess had been a Keith Burgess.”

“Double standards prevail to this day. A female teacher who abuses her position by becoming sexually involved with a male student is seen as Mrs Robinson, not a criminal.”

To me this is a tough call. I might tend to go along with the judge, however, because the 16-year-old victim was almost of age, the relationship does appear to have been consensual, and – at least when viewed superficially — the victim shows no sign of psychological damage. I could be wrong though. What do you think?

 

Kidnapped Mother’s Family Kills Abductor in Daring Vigilante Rescue!!

$
0
0

commentary by Patrick H. Moore

Opinions differ as to the validity of vigilante efforts in criminal matters and — for the most part — it’s probably a good thing that non-law-enforcement personnel are typically not in a position to mete out justice. Last June, however, in a rural area of Lafayette Parish, La., it was the family of kidnap victim Bethany Arceneaux, 29, of Duson, La, that rescued her from her abductor, Scott Thomas, in an abandoned house on the edge of a sugar cane field after law enforcement had searched for her fruitlessly for nearly two days. This is yet another true crime story in which the facts could easily be poured into a captivating crime novel.

Alexis Shaw of World News writes:

beth4The family of a kidnapped Louisiana mother tracked down and killed the father of her child in the abandoned house where he was allegedly holding her prisoner, authorities said.

Bethany Arceneaux, 29, of Duson, La., was abducted in the parking lot of a daycare where she was picking up her 2-year-old at approximately 5 p.m. on Wednesday, Lafayette Parish Sheriff’s Department Captain Kip Judice told ABCNews.com.

Witnesses saw the suspect, Scott Thomas, allegedly force Arceneaux into his white Buick LeSabre, before driving off…

beth2Although they were not married, according to Captain Judice, Thomas, 29, of Leonville, La., was the father of Bethany Arceneaux’s child. As a result of relationship problems, Bethany filed a police complaint on June 15, claiming Thomas locked her in a house and threatened to kill both her and her son. A protective order against Thomas was issued June 17 and Thomas was arrested on Aug. 8th, and later released, for violating the order.

At the time of the abduction, Bethany’s child was left behind in her car at the daycare center. Bethany’s mother arrived later and was allowed to take the child home with her. Meanwhile, the search for Thomas and Bethany kicked into high gear. Later that evening, law enforcement officials found Thomas’ car near an abandoned sugarcane field in a rural area of Lafayette Parish, La.

beth8One of Bethany’s shoes was found in the Buick LeSabre; the other had been left in the parking lot of the daycare center.

After locating Thomas’ vehicle, the authorities searched the sugarcane field Wednesday night and all day Thursday, but to no avail. The sugar cane towers two feet above a typical man’s head and it was brutally hard for the rescue team to fight their way through the dense cane.

It wasn’t until Friday morning that a break came resulting from a determined search mounted by Bethany’s own family members. They came upon a secluded, abandoned house behind a cluster of trees directly across the street from the field where Thomas had abandoned his car. According to Captain Judice, only the home’s roof was visible from the road:

“[The family] converged on a piece of property about a mile from where the car was found. One of the family members heard what he thought was a scream.”

Arceneaux’s cousin (it is unclear whether he was the family member who heard the scream) then approached the home, kicked in the door in and entered. There was Thomas holding the beleaguered, and considerably the worse-for-wear, Bethany captive. At the sight of her cousin, Thomas began stabbing Arceneaux, and a confrontation ensued.

“The cousin, who was armed, began firing several shots at Thomas,” Judice said. “After a couple of shots, [Arceneaux] was able to get free of him and they escorted her out of the house.”

beth6Meanwhile, officers who heard the gun shots fired surrounded the home. Upon entering, they found Thomas, who had sustained several gunshot wounds, lying lifeless on the ground.

Arcenaux, who had suffered multiple stab wounds, was transported by ambulance to Lafayette General Medical Center, where she is in stable condition.

Oddly, Captain Judice — in what would appear to be pre-autopsy protocol — stated that Thomas’ cause of death is not known. The captain also stated that Thomas did not own the abandoned home.

truckBethany, who was extremely weak and had not eaten or drunk anything since her abduction on Wednesday, told investigators that the home was the only place she remembers being held hostage.

Unsuprisingly, no charges have been filed against the cousin who shot Thomas, and according to Captain Judice, it is unlikely that the man will be charged:

“In the state of Louisiana, you have a right to protect yourself and others from imminent bodily harm. We believe at this point, based on evidence and statements collected, that this guy was acting in defense of Ms. Arceneaux and thus, was within the state law.”

*     *     *     *     *

Carol Kuruvilla of the New York Daily News writes:

beth3The family has been praised for their actions, but the case has also raised questions about why the police were second on the scene. Bethany’s cousin, Dawnetta Roy, found it “upsetting” that her family had to find the missing woman themselves.

But Cpl. Paul Mouton, a Lafayette Police Department spokesman, said that police were on the hunt as well. He claimed it was coincidence that the family found Bethany first.

“While we were looking on one side, they were looking in another and they came upon her. It just so happens where they were looking was where she was found,” Mouton said. “If we weren’t looking at all and they were searching, that would be different.”

“I’m so happy. God is good,” Monica Arceneaux-Henry, Bethany’s aunt, said. “We followed our faith and believed she was alive. God answers prayers.”

 *     *     *     *     *

Although I’m not generally an advocate of vigilante justice, which all too often can deteriorate into mob violence, in this case it seems that it was both effective and necessary. Although some readers will no doubt feel that he had it coming, we’ll never know for certain, however, whether the shooting of Thomas was actually necessary.

 

Skylar Neese and the Mean Girls Who Killed Her

$
0
0

by The Starks Shrink

Skylar Neese was just 16 years old when she climbed out of her bedroom window for the last time on July 5, 2012 at around midnight.  She was a bright teen, with a strong work ethic in both school and her part time job at Wendy’s.  But she had a taste for the party life, as many teens in small towns do.  This wasn’t her first time sneaking out of her home late at night, as was evident by the stool she’d left outside beneath her bedroom window to facilitate getting back into her room undetected by her parents. Mom and Dad were none the wiser.  When her father came home from working the night shift to drop off his car for Sklyar, she was nowhere to be found. Her mother wasn’t too disturbed – after all, Skylar was 16 and it was summer; she could be out with her friends shopping or swimming.  Dad called around to some of Skylar’s friends to see if they’d seen her, but came up empty. When the manager at Wendy’s called to ask if Skylar was coming to work, red flags went up for mom, since Skylar never missed work. The police were then called in. Weirdly, however, law enforcement presumed Skylar to be one of the many kids that run away from home each summer in a quest for independence and adventure. The Neese’s were not convinced of that and as the summer wore on turning to autumn, they became increasingly certain that this was not a choice that Skylar had made for herself.

sky6They were comforted and aided in their search for their daughter by one of her best friends — Shelia Eddy.  They’d known Shelia for years and thought of her as another daughter. In September, when school started, Skylar still hadn’t surfaced. Her bank accounts, social media accounts and cell phone had not been touched. Now, the climate began to change. The Neese family had a Facebook page that Mary (Skylar’s Mom) had set up to help people exchange information and hopefully help in the search for her daughter. Shelia Eddy was one of the posters on that page, posting about how she missed Skylar and hoped she’d come home.  Sadly, in reality, Shelia already knew all too well that Skylar would never be returning to her mother’s embrace.

sky9What is fascinating about the quest to find Skylar is how it played out on social media, particularly on Twitter. You see, Skylar had two best pals — Shelia Eddy and Rachel Shoaf.  She’d known Shelia for many years while Rachel had only joined their little posse about a year or so before.  But of course, in high school, a year can be an eternity. But now it is September; all the kids except one are back in school and they are talking. And talking. And they do it on social media, unlike any generation before them. Many of the kids suspected Shelia and Rachel of doing something to Skylar, or at the very least, knowing something.  What was amazing was that many of the details of the actual events that some of these kids tweeted about turned out to be the truth. In October and November, Skylar’s body hadn’t yet been found but kids at the school were tweeting to Rachel and skyasking about the big cut on her leg that she’d had in the days just after Skylar’s disappearance.  They tweeted to Shelia but she was much more brazen and impervious to the harassment.  Much of this was done via ‘subtweets’, which don’t call out a particular person, but those who are close to the subjects are completely aware of the context. And then the sock puppet accounts showed up.  They were anonymous and were very blatant in their accusations. This was in December of 2012. The two suspect girls were called  “pretty little liars” based on the TV series about mean girls who murdered.

sky4It was in December that Rachel Shoaf cracked.  She’d had a blowout with her mother who decided that Rachel needed more help than she could provide and called police who hauled her off to a local mental hospital for several weeks.  I give credit to Rachel’s mother for having the courage to intervene like that.  It had to be hard for her but it turned out to be the thing that broke the case.

Rachel, apparently guilt-ridden, went to a lawyer after her stint in mental care and confessed all.  And I mean ALL. Her attorney worked out a deal with authorities and in January, Rachel led them to Skylar’s remains which had been concealed in a remote area of Pennsylvania since that fateful night she’d crawled out her bedroom window.

In the meantime, one could watch the breakdown of Rachel and Shelia’s trust on Twitter. Rachel had cooperated with police and FBI in order to get a plea deal and implicated Shelia in the process. Shelia was the ultimate mean girl.  Her hubris was evident from her demeanor on Twitter and she clearly thought that she was above punishment for killing her best friend. She even tweeted “Yes it’s true, we went on 3 – referring to the fact that Shelia and Rachel had planned the attack on Skylar and stabbed her to death on the count of three.

This year both girls were finally brought to justice, with Rachel getting 30 years for her plea to 2nd degree murder and Shelia getting 15 to life for her plea to Murder One.  The horrific details came out at Rachel’s sentencing when the prosecutor read from Rachel’s confession.  They had lured Skylar from her home sky8intending to kill her.  They had driven to a remote area in Pennsylvania, just over the border from West Virginia.  They got her behind the car and on the count of three they both stabbed her to death with kitchen knives.  They stood over Skylar until she stopped breathing and then concealed her body with leaves and brush. They cleaned up with the cleaning supplies that Rachel had brought along and changed their bloody clothing.  They then drove home and went to bed.  These were children. Teens. How do teens plan, perpetrate and conceal a crime such as this? Skylar was murdered in July, Rachel broke in late December and Shelia was arrested the following May. I believe that social media played a part in breaking Rachel and it certainly played a role in demonstrating how cold and callous two teenage girls could be.  Shelia and Skylar’s twitter accounts are still up, though Rachel locked hers during her breakdown.  It’s a forensic psychologist’s dream since you can watch the plot unravel over time.  No one really knows the why the “mean girls” ran amuck. Rachel’s confession states that they “just didn’t want to be friends with her anymore”. Can the motive for murder really be as mundane as that?

Italian ‘Magician of the Bedroom’ Gets 6 Months for LOUD Sex: “I Can’t Help Being So Good”

$
0
0

commentary by Patrick H. Moore

The fact that life is rarely completely fair is something most of us gradually come to accept. This sobering reality is captured nicely in the irony inherent in the old adage: “Be careful what you wish for. It just might come true.”

One of the things a lot of guys and a lot of women desire is to be a magician in bed, a transcendent lover who catapults your partner to dizzying heights of passionate intensity. Well, that’s a lot to live up to but certainly a worthy goal.

But suppose you were that guy who could drive his lover mad with pleasure. Or suppose you were his partner and with your perfect communion with your lover you experienced indescribable pleasure. At first blush, this would seem to be a good thing, wouldn’t it? Why sure…

feet2But you know what they say about the best laid plans, as an unnamed Italian romancer recently discovered to his dismay in the northern Italian province of Padua. Newser writes:

“There’s a noisy romp between the sheets and then there’s sex so loud it’s considered “stalking” your neighbors. That was the charge a 46-year-old Italian man apparently faced in court, after a dozen of his neighbors filed a civil suit complaining of his loud lovemaking sessions. They took issue with “screams and moans” that “disturbed the peace in the condominium and the building’s decorum,” the Local reports.

It’s unclear, however, exactly who’s doing the screaming. Some of the Italian locals and the New York Daily News report that it was actually Loverboy’s girlfriend’s screams that woke the dead and offended the naysaying inhabitants of the condo complex.

feet9The Local reports that in the court filing, the 12 angry neighbors complained that the “screams and moans disturbed the peace in the condominium and the building’s decorum.”

According to the Articolo Tre news site, the man’s only real crime was being too good at sex, as his girlfriend’s rapturous wails kept the whole building awake.

When his turn to speak came, the 42-year-old reportedly made the logical argument that “stalking” and “noise” were not that the same thing and that he couldn’t help the fact he was “too good at sex.”

The judge was apparently in a churlish mood and was not swayed by Loverboy’s “good faith” argument. Believe it or not, he gave the magnificent c_______ 6 months in jail. It does not appear that he was clapped in irons, however, and is believed to have walked out of the courtroom a free man, stating that he planned on appealing his conviction which is perhaps a common occurrence in Italy.

feet4Before going any further, I think it’s important to note that unless information is being withheld, there is something refreshing about reading about the exciting sex life of a couple who apparently did not feel the need to engage in Erotic Asphyxiation (EA) or other alternative sexual practices, not that there’s anything wrong with alternative practices; rather, this case simply proves that the Creator or whatever alternative force brought us into being knew what he/she/it was doing when endowing humans with the sexual prerogative.

This is not the first time neighbours have filed a case over loud sex. In the UK in 2010, a woman was twice spared jail despite breaching court orders that she stop shouting and screaming during sex.

What is surpassingly strange, though, is the fact that as much fun as the world’s best sex may be, until you get arrested and jailed for being “too good at it,” what apparently really pays off when it comes to lining your pockets with ducats is bad sex, as another Italian couple recently discovered.

Newser has the story:

feet11It’s not your everyday court decision: An Italian couple has been awarded $28,000 in relation to their bad sex life. But the case isn’t quite as crazy as that might seem. Some two years ago, the female half of the couple was hit by a car while crossing the street; the injuries she sustained initially left her bedridden for three months, reports Italy’s La Nazione, and have permanently damaged their ability to have a sex life on par with what they previously enjoyed. And there are also other limitations for the two, who say they can’t ride bikes or travel together.

feet7As you might expect, the attorney representing the insurance company of the driver who hit the poor (un)fortunate woman, did not go down easily. If fact, in the best tradition of that exalted class of men and women known as criminal defense attorneys, the driver’s attorney got right to the point saying that as a middle-aged couple they wouldn’t be having an active sex life anyway, so where was the harm?

According to La Nazione, the Tuscan judge was unpersuaded. “You cannot consider age in the couple’s relationship—whether in sexual, social, or leisure terms.”

It is also reported that due to his wife’s injury, the husband now has to handle all the cooking, cleaning, and chores.

*     *     *     *     *

We live in a strange world. You get paid if you can’t have sex and you go to jail for being too good at it.


Flayed, Boiled and Broken on the Wheel: Death in the Bad Old Days

$
0
0

by Darcia Helle

In our modern, enlightened American culture, we keep our executions quietly behind closed doors. There was a time, though, in the pre-modern world, when this would have been regarded as no better than murder. Executions were public events. When our ancestors decided a person needed to die for his/her crimes, the entire town was expected to attend.

Many people of that time believed executing a criminal privately robbed that person of the right to say his final words, which was often a full-blown speech. A private execution also deprived the government of its show of power, as the criminal was paraded through town in an elaborate spectacle.

Staging state-sanctioned murders as public entertainment made for a wide array of imaginative and gruesome methods, prolonging death ever longer, as leaders continually looked for new forms of cruelty to punish the condemned. Here are some once popular death penalty options that make the electric chair look comforting.

Breaking The Wheel – Also Known As The Catherine Wheel 

cathThis method was popular from the Middle Ages into the 19th century. The condemned person was strapped to a large, heavy wooden wheel, his arms and legs stretched out and tied to the spokes. The executioner carried a hammer or large iron bar and, as the wheel was turned, he stuck the hammer through the spoke and pressed it against the limb, so that the pressure would crush the victim’s bones. The victim was left in excruciating pain, alive, but helpless, and could take days to die.

Occasionally a sympathetic court ordered ‘the mercy blow’. In this case, the executioner struck the victim on the stomach and chest, typically two or three times. Afterward, the victim was strangled for a quicker death.

cath3Vicious beatings while the condemned was strapped down to the wheel were also common. Criminals convicted of major offenses were bludgeoned ‘bottom up’, starting with their legs, in order to inflict the most possible pain while keeping the victim conscious. Those convicted of lesser crimes were beaten ‘top down’, starting with the throat, which might have allowed them to slip into blissful unconsciousness.

Sometimes fires were lit beneath the wheel, adding tremendous heat in order to heighten the victim’s pain.

Historian Joseph Ben Matthias (Flavius Josephus) wrote about an account he witnessed, with two criminals being executed on the wheel:

cath8“The executioners were ordered to bring the Christian prisoner in. His tunic was torn off and he was bound hand and foot with thongs, and fixed to the great wheel. All his joints were dislocated and all his limbs smashed. The wheel was stained with blood and the burning coals in the grate beneath it were extinguished by the blood pouring into it. Lumps of flesh clumped around the axle and everywhere there were bits of flesh and bone. Another was fastened to the wheel and stretched and burned with fire. Sharp spits, heated until they were red-hot, were applied to his back and stuck in his sides and inwards, burning him dreadfully.” 

Mystery surrounds Catherine of Alexandria, who was sentenced to be broken on the wheel but, perhaps miraculously, did not die there. Catherine was a Christian who lived in the early fourth century, during the time when the pagan Emperor Maxentius relentlessly persecuted Christians. A beautiful girl of just 18, Catherine was perhaps also a bit of an activist. She went to Maxentius and berated him for his religious tyranny. Maxentius must have been enticed by her beauty and, rather than putting her to immediate death, he commanded 50 of his best philosophers to convince her to take his side. Instead of becoming a convert to paganism, Catherine managed to persuade several of the philosophers to convert to Christianity.

cath10Further intrigued by her charms and ability, Maxentius then tried to seduce her. He asked the entrancing young woman to become his new bride. Catherine refused, stating that her spouse was Jesus Christ and to him she’d pledged her virginity. The irate Maxentius had her whipped and thrown in prison.

cath5Unbeknownst to Maxentius, his wife had become fascinated by Catherine. When he left on a trip to inspect his military camp, the empress visited Catherine at the prison. By the time the emperor arrived back at his castle, the empress and 200 of the soldiers had converted to Christianity. They were all put to immediate death, though historians do not provide details on how that was done, and Catherine was sentenced to death on the wheel.

Catherine, evidently, wasn’t about to make things easy on Maxentius. After she was strapped to the wheel, her bonds inexplicably came apart and the wheel broke. Maxentius then demanded Catherine be beheaded, which she wasn’t able to escape. Legend tells us that, when her head was severed, a milky substance flowed from her veins.

Flaying

cath11Flaying dates back to the time of the Assyrians, and was most popular around 1,000 years ago in the Middle East and Africa. The torture-killing involved removing skin and small bits of flesh from the body of a live prisoner, and was typically reserved for captured soldiers and witches. The condemned prisoner was tied to a stake in a public area. The executioner then carefully cut away strips of skin until the flesh beneath was fully exposed over the victim’s entire body. The victim would usually die of shock or blood loss. Afterward, the skin was nailed to a wall as a warning for others to obey the law.

One African tribe adapted their own form of flaying as punishment for adultery. The guilty couple would first be starved, then tied naked to two posts about four feet apart. Throughout the ordeal to follow, they were given only salt water to drink. The resulting dehydration probably helped speed their deaths.

On the first day of their public execution, the villagers watched as the executioner cut a piece of the woman’s flesh and forced her lover to eat it. On the second day, the executioner cut a chunk of the man’s flesh and force-fed it to the woman. Meanwhile, the executioner’s assistant worked to immediately staunch blood flow from the wounds, in order to keep the victims alive longer. The back-and-forth procedure continued until one of the lovers died. The survivor, though, was given no reprieve and was continually fed bits of flesh until he/she finally – and probably thankfully – died as well.

cath13The execution technique called Lingchi closely resembles flaying. Also translated as death by a thousand cuts, slow slicing, lingering death, and slow process, this ancient Chinese style of execution became somewhat of an art form. The term was derived from a classical description of ascending a mountain slowly.

Lingchi’s use in executions began in China around the year 900 and continued until its abolition in 1905. Reserved for crimes considered particularly severe, such as treason and killing one’s parents, the process entailed slowly slicing off chunks of the condemned person’s flesh.

Execution took place in a public area, where the condemned would be tied to a wooden frame or cross beside a table holding a basket of razor-sharp knives covered by a cloth. Each knife bore the marking for a particular part of the body. The executioner would reach beneath the cloth and pull out a knife. He would then slice the area designated by the knife’s inscription. The torture came to a merciful end only when the executioner pulled the knife with the marking for the heart.

This method appears to have been later changed to a more deliberate procedure, using a specific sequence of slicing and only one knife.

In later years large amounts of opium would first be given to the accused, although it is unclear as to whether this was an act of mercy or to prevent fainting and prolong torture. The condemned fortunate enough to come from wealthy families could offer the executioner a bribe to hasten death.

cath14For less serious crimes, the executioner would first slice the victim’s throat. The slicing away of flesh then became symbolic rather than torturous.

To the condemned, Lingchi was physical and psychological torture, as well as publicly humiliating. The principle behind the slicing of flesh lay in the spiritual belief that the victim’s body would not be intact in the afterlife. For the Chinese of that time, this may have been more horrifying than the actual torture.

In 1895, Sir Henry Norman witnessed a Lingchi execution. In The People and Politics of the Far East, Norman wrote that the executioner sliced off pieces by “grasping handfuls from the fleshy parts of the body, such as the thighs and the breasts”. He went on to state that “then the limbs are cut off piecemeal at the wrists and the ankles, the elbows and knees, the shoulders and hip. Finally the victim is stabbed in the heart and his head cut off.”

In 1904, in a public square in Beijing, China, accused murderer Wan Weiqin was put to death by a thousand cuts in front of a crowd of onlookers. He is among the last to have suffered this form of capital punishment.

Boiling 

cath15Archeological evidence shows this ancient form of torture and execution has been practiced throughout much of history. Boiling is exactly what it implies. The condemned were immersed in enormous pots of boiling water, oil or tar and left to cook until they died. Eventually executioners began using frying pans instead of pots, so they could flip the victim’s body over like a piece of meat or a fried egg.

Healthy prisoners with strong hearts did not die quickly. Much of the flesh could be cooked and fall away from the bone before the heart, lungs, and brain succumbed to the heat.

In 1530, Richard Roose was convicted of poisoning a pot of both intended for the Bishop of Rochester, his family, and his parish. King Henry VIII passed a special act decreeing he be boiled alive for the offense. Henry’s act, with death by boiling as punishment for poisoning, remained on the law books in England until 1863.

 *      *     *     *     *

While our modern society looks at these archaic death penalties as horrifying torture, those societies would have considered our secret government prisons cowardly and our closed prison executions nothing more than murder. Perhaps it’s time we put the super-sized frying pans and the electric chairs to rest.

Please click to below to view Darcia’s Helle’s previous posts:

Don’t Crucify Me, Dude! Just Shoot Me Instead! Spartacus and Death by Crucifixion

To Burn or Not to Burn? Auto-Da-Fé Is Not Good for Women or Children!

The Disgraceful Entrapment of Jesse Snodgrass: Keep the Narcs Out of Our Schools

Why Should I Believe You? The History of the Polygraph

“Don’t Behead Me, Dude!”: The Story of Beheading and the Invention of the Guillotine

Aileen Wuornos, America’s First High-Profile Female Serial Killer, Never Had a Chance

The Terror of ISO: A Descent into Madness

Al Capone Could Not Bribe the Rock: Alcatraz, Fortress of Doom

Cyberspace, Darknet, Murder-for-Hire and the Invisible Black Machine

darcDarcia Helle lives in a fictional world with a husband who is sometimes real. Their house is ruled by spoiled dogs and cats and the occasional dust bunny.

Suspense, random blood splatter and mismatched socks consume Darcia’s days. She writes because the characters trespassing through her mind leave her no alternative. Only then are the voices free to haunt someone else’s mind.

Join Darcia in her fictional world: www.QuietFuryBooks.com

The characters await you.

Damien Echols’ New Plea to the President

$
0
0

by Lise LaSalle

It’s not Damien Echols first plea to the authorities to try to right the wrong that he and his two compagnons de misère suffered after the brutal murder of three boys in his hometown.

 

 

Dubbed the ‘’West Memphis Three’’, Damien Echols, Jessie Misskelley and Jason Baldwin were charged with the murder of three 8-year old boys in 1994 in West Memphis. They fought for their innocence but to no avail, because a confession made by Misskelley under duress, gave the prosecutors  ammunition to convict them. As three indigent defendants, they did not stand a chance against the big powerful machine of the District Attorney’s Office, which was eager to find the culprits and appease the media and the area residents.

west memphis three

Misskelley and Jason Baldwin received life and Echols was sent to death row. They were released from prison after serving seventeen years pursuant to plea agreements reached with prosecutors: the three defendants entered ‘’Alford pleas,’’ in which they maintained their innocence but agreed that prosecution had enough evidence to convict them.

It is quite ironic that the three young men were falsely accused and had to falsely confess to get their freedom back.

The advent of plea bargaining in the legal system in the past century has rendered the classic ‘’trial’’ virtually obsolete. From 1976 through 2002, in terms of percentage of dispositions, state-court criminal trials declined from 8.5% to 3.3%, bench trials as a percentage of dispositions fell from 5.0% to 2.0%, and jury trials declined from 3.4% to 1.3%. While the guilty plea represents the largest share of adjudicated cases in federal criminal justice with 95.2%.

In the case of the West Memphis Three, the only substantial piece of evidence that existed linking them to the crime was, from all accounts, a coerced confession that was subsequently retracted and not even used during trial. They opted for an Alford plea to make sure Echols would be set free right away. They feared for his life on death row and wanted to avoid another lengthy legal fiasco.

Once entered into, this type of plea can only be undone by the Governor of the State who has the power to grant an executive clemency.

The Alford Plea

The Alford plea has evolved to encompass a small share of adjudicated cases in the United States. This plea derives from North Carolina v. Alford, in which the United States Supreme Court. in 1970, held that guilty pleas by defendants who maintain their innocence do not violate due process.

In Italy, Nolo Contendere is a plea that is the functional equivalent to the Alford doctrine which has the same legal effect as a plea of guilty on all further proceedings within the indictment. By entering such a plea, a defendant might be able to avoid formally admitting guilt at the time of sentencing, but he nonetheless consents to being treated as if he were guilty with no assurances to the contrary. In California, a nolo contendere plea is known as a West plea after a seminal case involving plea bargains.

In the Commonwealth countries such as England, Canada or Australia, the plea of nolo contendere is not permitted. The defendant must enter a plea of ‘’guilty’’ or ‘’not guilty’’. If a defendant refuses to enter a plea, the court will record a plea of ‘’not guilty’’.

Henry Alford was indicted for first-degree murder on December 2, 1963 and during his trial preparations, his attorney interviewed several witnesses who led him to believe Alford was guilty and that he probably would be convicted at trial. Even if there were no actual witnesses to the murder, some people swore under oath that Alford had taken his gun from his home. They also said that Alford confessed to the killing of the victim. But he maintained his innocence.

In view of these statements, Alford’s attorney recommended he plead guilty to a lesser charge of second-degree murder. Alford pled guilty to second-degree murder but stated to the court that he was innocent and that he was pleading guilty only to avoid the death penalty. The judge sentenced him to 30 years and Alford appealed on the constitutional ground that his plea was “the product of fear and coercion’’ and in violation of his constitutional rights.

In 1965, the state court found that the plea was entered into “willingly, knowingly and understandingly’’ and “made on the advice of competent counsel and in the face of a strong prosecution case.’’

Alford petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, first in the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, which denied the writ based on its findings that Alford had “voluntarily and knowingly agreed to plead guilty,’’ and then in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. A divided panel of the Fourth Circuit reversed and held that his plea was involuntary because it was motivated by fear of a death sentence.

The Supreme Court held that there are no constitutional barriers in place to prevent a judge from accepting a guilty plea from a defendant who wants to plead guilty while still protesting his innocence.

The Court stated, “An individual accused of crime may voluntarily, knowingly, and understandingly consent to the imposition of a prison sentence even if he is unwilling or unable to admit his participation in the acts constituting the crime.’’

The Court also held that a judge can accept the plea only if “strong evidence of actual guilt’’ exists.  The Court also noted that the defendant in this case was represented and advised by competent counsel and that there was substantial evidence that tended to demonstrate guilt; thus, the defendant “intelligently’’ concluded that it would be to his advantage to plead guilty in order to avoid the death penalty.

It is important to note that in its holding, the Court did not give all defendants a legal right to enter Alford pleas; rather, the Court left it to individual states and judges to decide whether they want to accept Alford pleas. The Court stated:

A criminal defendant does not have an absolute right under the Constitution to have his guilty plea accepted by the court…although the States may by statute or otherwise confer such a right. Likewise, the States may bar the courts from accepting guilty pleas from any defendants who assert their innocence…which gives a trial judge discretion to ‘’refuse to accept a plea of guilty’’We need not now delineate the scope of that discretion.

Justice Brennan, joined by Justices Douglas and Marshall, dissented, focusing on the death penalty aspect of the case. He stated that Alford’s guilty plea was not made voluntarily because he was “so gripped by fear of the death penalty”.

Currently, forty-seven states and the District of Columbia accept Alford pleas.

Federal courts have constantly discouraged Alford pleas and federal prosecutors are reluctant to encourage them because the policy of the U.S. Department of Justice discourages them. Statistics show that state defendants enter Alford pleas much more frequently than federal defendants.

In general, defendants use Alford pleas much less frequently than traditional guilty or not-guilty pleas.

FALSE CONFESSIONS AND THE INCEPTION OF THE INNOCENCE MOVEMENT

innocence summit

It is clear why attorneys whose clients have confessed would seek a plea bargain: most people do not understand why someone would confess to a crime that he did not commit. The United States Supreme Court has recognized the power of confessions as evidence of guilt. But psychologists have also commented on the persuasive power of confessions.

Confessions are so powerful for a judge or jury responsible for deciding factual issues in a trial that it is not surprising that innocent defendants and their attorneys might want to rush to enter Alford pleas in exchange for a reduced sentence when defendants have made false confessions.

False confessions usually arise from specific police interrogation tactics and can occur when police interrogators are pressuring and psychologically coercive. The Reid Technique is the most widely implemented police interrogation and it instructs the police “to use coercive and deceptive techniques to obtain a confession’’ such as “presenting false evidence, preventing the suspect from speaking unless he/she is making a confession, tricking the suspect into a confession by offering an understanding and sympathetic attitude, and minimizing the moral seriousness of the crime.”

Detective Flores comes to mind with his interrogation of Jodi Arias where he basically told her that Travis Alexander was a player and she was a nice girl. It was also used on Colonel Williams where the detective acted like his friend and used a very friendly tone to put him at ease.

Experts have uncovered at least 250 interrogation-induced false confessions over the last thirty years, and there are likely many more. The U.S. Supreme Court has also recognized that sophisticated police interrogation techniques can produce false confessions. In 2009, the Court found that “there is mounting empirical evidence that these pressures (associated with custodial police interrogation) can induce a frighteningly high percentage of people to confess to crimes they never committed.”

 

THE WEST MEMPHIS THREE

On May 6, 1993, the dead bodies of eight-year-old Steven Branch, Michael Moore and Christopher Byers were found submerged in a creek in a strip of woods next to a highway in an area of West Memphis, Arkansas, known as “Robin Hood Hills.” The boys had been reported missing the night before by Byer’s adoptive father, John Mark Byers. They were found in the nude, their hands and feet hog-tied with their own shoelaces, and they had been beaten and mutilated.  The cause of death was ruled as drowning.

boys

With no leads, the police began to suspect that the murders were a result of satanic cult activity.

Guided by a youth worker not too fond of Damien Echols, they focused their attention on this eighteen-year-old high school dropout, who wore black and was supposedly, engaged in Satanism. He was a troubled teen showing signs of personality disorders and depression, probably stemming from his family life.

A witness who had claimed to witness the murders, led the police to seventeen-year-old Jessie Misskelley. His statements were clearly unreliable, as she had told various versions and her story was full of holes.

Misskelley had a very low IQ, and it made him extremely susceptible to police interrogation techniques. Over the course of several hours (transcripts of the interrogation are unavailable, although transcripts of the confessions themselves are available), he confessed to seeing Damien Echols and his friend, Jason Baldwin, rape and kill the three boys.

However, his confession featured many characteristics that experts have identified as indicative of a false confession. The facts of the crime were wrong.

For instance, Jessie claimed that he, Damien, and Jason had picked up the boys and killed them at around noon; however, the murder had happened in the evening.

Misskelley refused to testify against Damien and Jessie. Defense attorneys later learned that one juror had actually read about Misskelley’s confession and told the other jury members during deliberations.

Echols and Baldwin were both found guilty of first-degree murder. Baldwin was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole and Echols received a death sentence. The court of public opinion wanted to see them found guilty and they were.

During the investigation and trial, HBO began filming a documentary about the murders that came to be titled Paradise Lost. This documentary shocked viewers and many supporters of the West Memphis Three decided to take action. Experienced appellate attorneys were brought into the case.  The three defendants petitioned for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence, including DNA-testing results that excluded Misskelley, Baldwin, and Echols as donors of genetic material recovered from the crime scene.

Lower court judges repeatedly denied these petitions. Finally, in November 2010, more than fifteen years after their convictions, the Supreme Court of Arkansas granted the petitioners’ request for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether a new trial was in order; the hearing was to take place in October 2011.

However, it was obvious that this process would drag on and the West Memphis Three would have to languish for years in prison while awaiting the outcome of the hearing and a possible new trial.

Defense attorney Steven Braga contacted the State and made a proposal: the defendants would enter an Alford plea; in exchange, all three would be released from prison.  The State agreed to the deal. The decision to accept the deal was not an easy one for the West Memphis Three, and especially for Jason Baldwin, who wanted to fight for his innocence and obtain a full exoneration.

Damien Echols, on the other hand, had been in solitary confinement for most of his prison stay on death row; his emotional and physical health were jeopardized. Therefore, he accepted the agreement as a means to get out of prison as quickly as possible.  Understanding the toll that his stay on death row was having on Echols, Baldwin generously agreed to the deal.

On August 19, 2011, the three men were freed

free memphis

Each defendant made the choice that he felt best served his immediate needs at the time of the plea, but it is important that innocent defendants and their attorneys understand the harsh ramifications of Alford pleas regarding post-conviction remedies or hopes of proving “actual innocence.” After analyzing the potential benefits and negative consequences of using the plea, and given the recent success of the Innocence Movement in spreading awareness about the phenomenon of false confessions, legal experts think that a defendant should not enter an Alford plea if the State’s case against him rests on a confession lacking any corroborating evidence, such as was the case with the West Memphis Three.

If any new DNA evidence is found in the case of the West Memphis Three, for example, the defendants cannot use this newly discovered evidence to seek a new trial or a full exoneration by a judge. Rather, after the West Memphis Three entered their Alford pleas, prosecutors “declared the case closed.” This also has ramifications for the victims’ families. Assuming that the West Memphis Three are in fact innocent, as many have come to believe, the true perpetrator(s) of the crime will likely never be brought to justice. No more public investigations will be done and no new leads will be explored. Echols, Baldwin, and Misskelley will remain the convicted killers of Christopher Byers, Michael Moore, and Steven Branch unless the Governor of Arkansas grants them clemency. As previously mentioned, the West Memphis Three’s cases are procedurally unique because their Alford pleas were entered years after their convictions as a means of securing release for the defendants.

However, while the West Memphis Three are currently out of prison, they are not fully exonerated in a legal sense.

A better solution could lie in the judicial system itself. Maybe judges should refrain from accepting such pleas when the evidence of guilt is based solely on a confession. Or maybe as educated citizens, we should place more political pressure on prosecutors to refrain from bringing a case against a defendant based solely on a confession that exhibits classic signs of coercion and contamination. No matter the solution, one thing is clear: it is an utter travesty for our justice system to allow innocent defendants to sit in prison or to fail to give a defendant who has been released on an Alford plea the ability to clear his name.

 

The West Memphis Six

It is obvious that the defendants and the three young boys in this case, were victimized. The boys were killed under atrocious circumstances and three teenagers also lost their freedom and their future because of the prejudice and false presumptions of the prosecutors.

We might never know who perpetrated the crime against the three young boys. The scene of the crime was close to a truck stop so it could easily have been a crime of opportunity. The flimsy DNA found on the boys could be traced to one of the boy’s stepfather and his friend but not unlike the first case, it is not sufficient to draw conclusions. And once again, some unreliable witnesses are now pointing the fingers at supposedly guilty parties.

Three new witnesses even include a boy who like Misskelley, has a low IQ and is susceptible to suggestion. It seems to be destined to be a case of hearsay. And unless strong evidence is uncovered, the same mistakes should not be repeated.

Damien Echols published his book Life after Death in 2012 and the French version just came out. During his book tour in France, Damien took the opportunity to address President François Hollande and pleaded with him to ask Obama to reopen the case to clear the West Memphis Three’s names. Let’s hope that this plea will be more profitable.

la vie après la mort

You can spread the word by sharing and signing the enclosed petition.

https://t.co/DmqArcSXCi

Ted Bundy’s Amazing Double-Barreled Jailbreaks

$
0
0

compiled by Patrick H. Moore

On June 30, 1976, the notorious serial killer,Ted Bundy, was sentenced in Utah to 1 to 15 years in state prison with the possibility of parole for the kidnapping of Carol DaRonch. Thus, Bundy found himself serving real time. While he was incarcerated in Utah State Prison, investigators began searching for evidence to connect him to the murders of Caryn Campbell and Melissa Smith. The die was cast and from this point forward, Bundy’s legal problems were only going to get worse. Rachel Bell of Crime Library writes:

tedd7Detectives discovered in Bundy’s VW hairs that were examined by the FBI and found to be characteristically alike to Campbell’s and Smith’s hair. Further examination of Caryn Campbell’s remains showed that her skull bore impressions made by a blunt instrument, and those impressions matched the crowbar that had been discovered in Bundy’s car a year earlier. Colorado police filed charges against Bundy on October 22, 1976, for the murder of Caryn Campbell.

In April of 1977, Ted was transferred to Garfield County Jail in Colorado to await trial for the murder of Caryn Campbell.

tedd2While preparing for his trial, Bundy became increasingly unhappy with his attorney as he became convinced that the man was inept. Well-versed in the law, Bundy became convinced that he could do a better job representing himself and fired his lawyer. His self-confidence was such that he convinced himself that he would succeed at the trial which was scheduled for November 14, 1977. Bundy talked his way into being granted permission to leave the jail occasionally to utilize the courthouse library in Aspen to conduct legal research. What the police didn’t know was that he had a backup plan known as jailbreak.

Rachel Bell writes:

On June 7th, during one of his trips to the library at the courthouse, Bundy managed to jump from an open window, injuring his ankle in the process, and escaped to freedom. He was not wearing any leg irons or handcuffs, so he did not stand out among the ordinary citizens in the town of Aspen. It was an escape that had been planned by Ted for a while. Aspen Police were quick to set up roadblocks surrounding the town, yet Ted knew to stay within the city limits for the time being and lay low. Police launched a massive land search, using scent tracking bloodhounds and 150 searchers in the hopes of catching Ted. However, Ted was able to elude them for days.

tedd5Rachel Bell explained that while he was on the run, Bundy managed to live off of food he filched from local cabins and nearby campers. At times he slept in ones that were abandoned. Bundy knew he couldn’t hide in Aspen forever and that what he really needed was a car. Ted believed that he was destined to be free. According to an interview with Michaud and Aynesworth, Bundy explained that he felt as if he were invincible:

“(N)othing went wrong. If something did go wrong, the next thing that happened was so good it compensated. It was even better”.

tedd3Filled with his peculiar combination of positive thinking and hubris, Bundy eventually stole a car with the keys left in it. But, his luck was short-lived. While trying to flee Aspen in the stolen vehicle, he was spotted and taken back into custody.

Amazingly, although Bundy was now required to wear handcuffs and lef irons, he was still allowed to continue conducting his legal research at the Courthouse law library. Meanwhile, he bided his time and planned his next escape attempt.

Seven months later, Bundy tried again. Rachel Bell writes:

tedd6On December 30th, he crawled up into the ceiling of the Garfield County Jail and made his way to another part of the building. He managed to find another opening in the ceiling that led down into the closet of a jailer’s apartment. He sat and waited until he knew the apartment was empty, then casually walked out of the front door to his freedom. His escape would go undiscovered until the following afternoon, more than fifteen hours later.

By the time police learned of his escape, Bundy was well on his way to Chicago. Chicago was one of the few stops that Bundy would make along the route to his final destination, sunny Florida. By mid-January of 1978 Ted Bundy, using his newly acquired name Chris Hagen, had settled comfortably into a one-room apartment in Tallahassee, Florida.

Although Bundy’s back-to-back jailbreaks seem almost miraculous, and he briefly enjoyed his new-found freedom, his penchant for murdering girls soon got the best of him, and in February of 1978, he was arrested for the final time in Tallahassee.

 

Click here to view our previous Ted Bundy posts:

Ten Fatal Facts about Ted Bundy’s Formative Years

14 Cold-Blooded Quotes by Serial Killer Ted Bundy

The Two Faces of Eugène François Vidocq, the World’s First Private Investigator

$
0
0

by Bob Couttie

If you’ve watched Les Miserables, then you will have seen Eugène François Vidocq not once but twice, as Jean Valjean the reformed criminal and as Police Inspector Javert. Why was this man, almost unknown today outside Francophile and police history circles, given two bites of the cherry by Victor Hugo in his classic historical novel set in 19th century France?

Vidocq was so influential that Edgar Allan Poe based his detective character C. Auguste Dupin on him in the classic The Murders in the Rue Morgue. In a possible fit of pique, Conan Doyle’s Study in Scarlet dismisses Vidocq under the name Lecoq as a “miserable bungler” while borrowing some of his techniques.

eu6This petty crook turned cop changed the face of police work forever, developing investigation and criminal intelligence systems still in use today across the world. He established the first plain-clothes detective department and the first private detective agency. Despite being a master of self-publicity, today he is relatively obscure, a fate that would have appalled him.

He was born on 24 July 1775 in Arras, France to a fairly well-off family and grew into a wild teenager. When he was 13 he got his first taste of prison when his father had him arrested for stealing some of the family silver.

euAfter two weeks in prison Vidocq was released, completely unredeemed. Shortly afterwards, he stole money from his parents’ bakery business and skedaddled to Ostend in Belgium with plans to sail for America. He lost the money in a scam and joined a group of entertainers to survive. It was hard work but he did get regular meals – he acted as a cannibal in a geek show in which he ate raw meat.

Eventually he returned home, broke, and joined the army. Vidocq himself claims that while in the army he challenged fourteen people to a duel, killing two of them. While in prison for two weeks for an unknown violation, Vidocq helped another inmate escape.

Although Vidocq became a war veteran, participating in two battles, his rebellious attitude made him a bad fit as a soldier. After hitting an officer, he deserted and joined another regiment. Although Vidocq escaped charges of desertion, he found himself persona non grata in the military and had to resign.

The next year brought him an unhappy marriage to a woman who fooled him by claiming she was pregnant when she was not. Vidocq claimed that he killed his wife’s lover in a duel although the story appears to be a bit of fantasy.

eu2For the next 15 years, Vidocq was constantly being arrested for various petty crimes. Getting jailed, escaping and going on the run under an assumed name became his modus operandi. Once in a while he would try to go straight but somehow or other his past his past would come back and bite him.

Finally he was arrested once more on 1 July 1809. He was tired of  life on the run but his past had not equipped him well to do much else, except perhaps become a police spy. He offered to become an informant. His offer was accepted but still meant he had to go to prison to collect and pass on information received from the inmates. Eventually he was released from prison under the guise of yet another escape. He then circulated in the French underworld, protected by various disguises and his acting skills.

eu13He went onto form a team of civilians, mostly criminals, and including women, to help him with his undercover work. He called it Brigade de la Sûreté – The Security Brigade. Within a year the brigade was formally made part of the French Prefecture of Police. At the end of 1812, it was recognised as a police security force and changed its name to the Sûreté Nationale. It was the world’s first plain clothes detective unit working undercover and Vidocq was appointed to head it.

The poacher had turned gamekeeper.

eu15He revolutionised detective work by setting up a card index of crimes, criminals and their modus operandis. He also introduced the use of  indelible ink to ensure the cards could not be altered or forged, and therefore could be presented as evidence in court. That was hardly his only innovation: He used plaster of Paris to preserve a boot impression at a burglary and traced the criminal by matching his tracks to his footware.

Vidocq was also the first to use ballistics in criminal investigations.

In those days evidence was generally not used to establish guilt but to extract a confession: When Vidocq demonstrated that a bullet which had killed a woman matched a gun owned by her lover, the latter confessed. A forger confessed when it was shown he had a criminal record and handwriting evidence proved he had falsified a document.

eu4Vidocq was not above using fake scientific evidence to secure a confession. At one crime scene where there had been a fight, Vidocq claimed that the blood came from the attacker. He came up with a suspect, tracked him to a bar and provoked a fight through which he got a sample of the suspect’s blood on a handkerchief. When a chemical was applied both blood samples turned bright red, supposedly showing that they matched. The suspect confessed. It was a bluff on Vidocq’s part — blood typing had yet to be invented — but it secured a confession.

Vidocq’s subtle, albeit unorthodox, techniques were ahead of their time. Police of the period usually secured their confessions by merely beating their suspects until they finally caved in and told them what they wanted to hear.

After arguing with his superiors, Vidocq resigned on 20 June 1827 at the age of 52 after 18 years with the police. He set up a paper mill but ran into money problems and declared bankruptcy. By then the police leadership had changed and a new king was on the throne. Vidocq was invited back to head the Sûreté again.

France was undergoing a period of unrest and revolution. Vidocq’s organisation was accused of treating rioters badly. Some police superiors did not like his methods, or the people who worked for him, and a scandal which implicated him in  robbery led to him once again resigning.

eu14In 1833 Vidocq went into private practice. He set up the Le bureau des renseignements, the world’s first private detective agency. Inevitably, he was looked upon with disfavour by the authorities and several attempts were made to put him out of business, including an extortion charge. Although Vidocq was cleared of the accusations, his business suffered.

He finally died at the then very reasonable age of 82. His had been an adventurous life and one that left behind a little-known legacy that still survives today.

You can check out the Vidocq Society here.

Nevada Squatter Cliven Bundy Says His Battle for Freedom May Escalate into the Next Ruby Ridge

$
0
0

by Robert Emmett Murphy, Jr.

Cliven Bundy says his battle for Freedom may escalate into the Next Ruby Ridge.

No it won’t, in part because it’s not really about his freedom, but his lawlessness.

This guy is fast becoming a folk-hero for his stand against the Federal Government, but how many of Cliven Bundy’s fans ask themselves what the fight is really about?

cliv7It’s about three things:

1. Who the land actually belongs to? 

2. Does the Government have the right to regulate land use for environmental protection? 

3. What does means to live in a nation with rule of law?

The answers:

1. Despite Bundy’s claims, the land is demonstrably Federal property.

2. As it is federal property, and the habitat of an endangered species, the Federal Government not only has the right, but the responsibility to regulate it. And those regulations did not forbid Bundy using it for grazing, only insisted that he pay fees and obey rules.

3. Bundy fought this in the courts, and already lost, so he cannot claim he was denied due process. He continued to engage in demonstrably illegal behavior, trespassing and continuing to refuse to pay his lawful fees. All the while the utmost restraint was employed in dealing with him (this is news now, but it has been dragging on for 21 years). Moreover, he has threatened violence against Federal civilian employees and law enforcement, so he both picked and escalated this fight.

cliv11The fight involves a 600,000-acre area under Bureau of Land Management control in Nevada called Gold Butte, near the Utah border. It is the habitat of the protected desert tortoise, and ranchers whose cattle graze there must pay fees.

Bundy stopped paying grazing fees of about $1.35 a month per cow-calf pair in 1993. He said he didn’t have to because his Mormon ancestors worked the land since the 1880s, giving him rights to the land. “We own this land,” he said, not the Feds. He claims this is a State’s Rights Issue, and that he is willing to pay grazing fees but only to Clark County, not BLM. (Note: He hasn’t cut any checks to Clark County either.)

After five years of refusing to pay fees, in 1998, the BLM finally revoked his grazing permit. Clark County then bought out that permit for $375,000 (buying the permit is explicit acknowledgment by Clark County of who the land really belongs to) and retired it permanently to protect the desert tortoise under the Clark County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. It was ultimately Clark County, not the Feds, that forbid all grazing on the land.

Bundy continued to trespass and graze illegally, so a Federal judge ordered a round-up in 2012. This, however, was postponed by BLM after Bundy threatened violence toward federal employees.

cliv17Since then, he has lost two federal court rulings — and a judge last October prohibited him from physically interfering with any seizure or roundup operation. This past Sunday, his son, Dave Bundy, 37, was arrested Sunday for refusing to disperse as the roundup began, but freed the next day.

As of this date, Bundy owes the federal government some $1.1 million in unpaid grazing fees, trespass fines and interest.

Says Bundy, “This is a lot bigger deal than just my cows. It’s a statement for freedom and liberty and the Constitution.” 

Says his wife Carol, “It’s a freedom issue that we’re really fighting here, and it’s bigger than our cows and bigger than the tortoises. It’s about the federal government wanting control to do whatever it wants to do.”

cliv18But this isn’t exactly a David and Goliath parable. Don’t think one man vs. jack-booted impersonal government. Plenty of citizens not only support, but were campaigning for, the government to take action — notably conservationists who were threatening to sue the Feds over their inaction in regards to Bundy’s law-breaking.

John Hiatt, Red Rock Audubon’s conservation chairman says: “From the standpoint of wildlife, the springs and riparian areas in Gold Butte are vital. The most immediate result of the removal of the trespass cattle will be the recovery of the vegetation around these water sources which will benefit all wildlife species.”

Terri Robertson, President of Friends of Sloan Canyon, “Mr. Bundy has long falsely believed that Gold Butte is his ranch. We all know that is not the reality, and it is time for him for obey the law.”

Rob Mrowka, senior scientistatt  the Center for Biological Diversity, “The federal government has been caving in to Cliven Bundy for years at the sacrifice of lands that are not only being destroyed for the tortoise but also for all the people of the United States who own it… Again and again federal judges have said the BLM has the right and duty to remove cattle trespassing in the Gold Butte area to protect desert tortoises and other imperiled species. We’re heartened and thankful that the agencies are finally living up to their stewardship duty.”

So one the one side you have the land’s lawful owners, who just happen to be the Federal Government, who also are supported by a constituency of citizens, and are acting to protect both a natural resource and rule of law.

cliv3Who does Bundy have of his side? Apparently not his fellow cattleman. An article in the Las Vegas Review Journal quoted a statement from the Nevada Cattlemen’s Association which took pains to point out they had nothing to do with Bundy’s “range war”:

“Nevada Cattlemen’s Association does not feel it is in our best interest to interfere in the process of adjudication in this matter, and in addition NCA believes the matter is between Mr. Bundy and the federal courts.”

By and large, ranchers are getting a good deal from public lands ranching, and they seem to fear that Bundy’s antics may jeopardize that. After all, paying a couple dollars a month per head of cattle and letting the public pick up the multi-million dollar tab to repair damage to the land is a good deal for them

But the anti-Government Militias seem to be willing to stand up for Bundy. From the Las Vegas Review Journal:

“From near and wide, armed men are trickling toward Cliven Bundy’s ranch, where the rancher’s fight with the federal government has become a rallying cry for militia groups across the United States.”

cliv16By late Wednesday of this week, there were three of these “armed men”. Two, Ryan Payne and Jim Lardy, are members of the West Mountain Rangers; Payne is also a coordinator with Operation Mutual Aid, which he says is a national militia coalition group. Said Payne, “We need to be the barrier between the oppressed and the tyrants. Expect to see a band of soldiers.”

The third armed man was Stephen Dean, a member of the People’s United Mobile Armed Services. He said he made the trip in hopes of heading off another Ruby Ridge or Waco, echoing Bundy’s repeated references to tragic standoffs between Federal Law Enforcement and suspected (or in the case of Waco established) criminals that, unlike this, took place on the citizen’s own property. Dean said he also carries weapons more powerful than his firearms: a camera and the Internet.

The only national media attention this has recieved was from Fox news. Their report was shamefully slanted, downplayed or ignored the most important facts, and bluntly characterized this, and all other forms of land conservation as economic suicide. Bundy was interviewed and allowed to spout un-subtlety implied threats of violence without challenge. Well, it was Hannity. What did you expect? Journalism?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=armAcbEO1PE#t=209

This Prairie Fire, if it is that, had its spark last week when the BLM announced the area would be closed through May 12 while contractors conduct the roundup using helicopters, vehicles and temporary pens. The cost was projected as $966,000, or almost as much as what Bundy owes the government.

cliv15Dean was probably was the person who filmed the protesters confrontation with Federal officers. The crowd of protesters is small, and seemed to be made up mostly of Bundy’s family members who Bundy and his supporters tried the round up. His son Ammon was hit with a stun gun but not arrested. Bundy’s sister, Margaret Houston, states that she was thrown to the ground by a BLM officer. She also wasn’t arrested. There were claims that dogs had been sicced on protesters and protesters were hit by government vehicles, but there is no evidence on the tape that anyone was injured. The video seems to show law enforcement showing a great deal of restraint as compared to the protestors.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhJ6H9vlEDA

When the protesters chant triumphantly at the 6:30 mark, it is not stated that the agents were assisting the exit from the scene of a BLM vehicle that had been blocked by protesters, and they departed after they had accomplished this. According to a BLM and National Park Service statement, the incident started when “a BLM truck driven by a non-law enforcement civilian employee assisting with gather operations was struck by a protester on an ATV, and the truck’s exit from the area was blocked by a group of individuals who gathered around the vehicle.” The peaceful protest had “crossed into illegal activity” in recent days, with people “blocking vehicles associated with the gather, impeding cattle movement, and making direct and overt threats to government employees….These isolated actions that have jeopardized the safety of individuals have been responded to with appropriate law enforcement actions.”

cliv5So far, the round-up has been successful, with 352 animals gathered, many belonging to Bundy. There are concerns that his cows have mingled with feral cattle, un-immunized and perhaps disease carrying. This could pose complications when the Feds try to auction them off to reimburse costs.

Gov. Brian Sandoval and Senator Dean Heller have condemned the manner in which BLM conducted the long delayed round-up. Sandoval decried an “atmosphere of intimidation…that such conduct is offensive to me and countless others…No cow justifies the atmosphere of intimidation which currently exists nor the limitation of constitutional rights that are sacred to all Nevadans.” He especially objected to road closings and the establishment of “First Amendment Zones” to keep protesters and Federal employees separate.

But notably, neither addressed the issue of the legality of the round up itself or the legal ownership of the property in question.

The BLM insisted that allowing Bundy to go for so long was unfair to thousands of other ranchers who abide by range laws. Bundy is not the only rancher who violated federal grazing regulations, although his case is among the most severe, BLM officials said. Most violations are resolved by the next grazing season and tied to lesser issues such as failing to leave grazing lands by a specified seasonal date. The seized cattle already approach, or exceed, three hundred, a giant operation for an agency the typical seizes about four cattle a year.

Just as the confrontation started to receive national attention, it fizzled out. As of Saturday, it looked like Bundy had won because the Feds were backing off. In a public statement, BLM Director Neil Kornze said :

“Based on information about conditions on the ground, and in consultation with law enforcement, we have made a decision to conclude the cattle gather because of our serious concern about the safety of employees and members of the public.

“We ask that all parties in the area remain peaceful and law-abiding as the Bureau of Land Management and National Park Service work to end the operation in an orderly manner.”

But notable here is the fact there is no concession to any rightness in Bundy’s cause, or that he could unilaterally stop paying legally rendered fees and ignore repeated court orders. The statement cites safety issues, which. of course, means Bundy’s threats of violence. It doesn’t bode well for the legitimacy of a Federal authority, or a Law Enforcement agency, when it backs off when the criminals act tough; this is likely to encourage more ranchers to follow Bundy’s lead.

Moreover, the government is now vulnerable to a renewed law suit by the conservationists.

cliv4Don’t be surprised if the cattle disappear from public land anyway. Bundy is a criminal, a bully, a border-line seditionist, with multiple court orders against him, and opposition within his own community. He may withdraw his now smaller herd back to his own property. Then the Feds may choose to continue to use contracted cattleman gather the cattle up, only more slowly and discreetly, maybe even one at a time. There are other options as well, and these could be worse for Bundy now that the round up has been temporarily abandoned — the Feds now have the option to wait until his new, radical, Militia friends go home, and then pursue criminal charges against him for obstruction of governmental administration and menacing. They may seize his bank accounts and the property that actually belongs to him because of his mounting debts ($1.1 million in unpaid fees, fines, and interest, plus nearly another million for the cost of the aborted round up, plus however much that cost was inflated because of the need to increase the law enforcement presence since he threatened to start a range war). Bundy fought the law, but ultimately the law will win. And as romantically as the cowboy and the outlaw are often viewed in our culture, in this case the law should prevail.

 

 

Viewing all 1600 articles
Browse latest View live