Quantcast
Channel: All Things Crime Blog
Viewing all 1600 articles
Browse latest View live

How Errol Flynn, Hollywood’s Bad Boy, Beat His Rape Charges!

$
0
0

compiled by Patrick H. Moore

On February 6, 1943, the famed film actor Errol Flynn, after a month-long trial, was acquitted of the rapes and statutory rapes of Peggy Satterlee and Betty Hansen. The jury deliberated for 13 hours before returning with their unanimous not guilty verdict. According to Trove, Flynn, who had been uncharacteristically subdued throughout the lengthy ordeal, shouted gleefully upon hearing the good news:

Gosh! I feel like whooping!

erro3We’re not sure if “whooping” is a euphemism for sexual intercourse but it certainly sounds like one.  What is known is that while the trial was going on, Mr. Flynn was pursuing and romancing 18-year old Nora Eddington, a teenage redhead who was the lobby cigarette girl at the courthouse. Flynn, who was never shy about expressing himself, explained:

I carefully checked her age. She was eighteen, safe ground. Her name, it turned out, was Nora Eddington.  What I didn’t know was that her father was Captain Jack Eddington of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Office.

Flynn later married Nora Eddington, but like his other marriages, it was doomed to fail.

erroThe  jury forewoman, a Mrs. Anderson, explained that during the 13 hours the jury was out, there were seven votes of 10 to 2 in favor of an acquittal. Finally, however, the two “hold- outs” capitulated. While all this was going on, Flynn literally could not  sit still and “lit one cigarette after another while rising from his chair and sitting down again.”

Naturally, the courtroom went wild when the verdict was finally read.  In addition to shouting about the joys of “whooping,” Flynn“jumped from his chair and rushed across the court-room to the jury and shook hands enthusiastically with the forewoman and others. Spectators cheered and crowded around Flynn and thumped his back.”

The Judge stated that he believed that the evidence was evenly divided but that  he felt the verdict was correct.

Flynn, who has been accused of many things including having Nazi leanings, commented in an interview:

erro2It’s wonderful news. I did not become an American citizen for nothing. The fair play I received at this trial proves that. My confidence in American justice kept me hoping for such a verdict.

Peggy Satterlee said: “I knew those women would acquit him. They just sat and looked adoringly at him as if he was their son or something. The trial was an awful strain and the verdict horrible. I wish they had taken Betty Hansen and left me out. I was working and minding my own business.”

Given Errol Flynn’s “skin of his teeth” escape, not unlike his many magnificent escapes in his swashbuckling films, one can’t help but wonder who his adversaries were. Who were Peggy Satterlee and Betty Hansen?

Sir! A Magazine for Males, October, 1954, brings us this on Flynn and the two young ladies:

pegbetIt seems that Flynn got entangled with two lovely young things at two different times in the space of a year. One was a Miss Betty Hansen, aged 17; the other a Peggy Satterlee of even more tender years.

The girls were irked with Flynn and their parents were irked with him. The State of California, having been duly applied to, decided to try him for both charges at one and the same time.  The public, to say the least, never had it better.

Flynn claimed that the whole thing was ridiculous; although he knew the girls, he had no knowledge that they were under 18. Flynn had a point. Both young women appeared to be of the age of legal consent:

Miss Satterlee danced at N.T.O’s Florentine Gardens, clad mostly in a plunge neckline, and Miss Hansen had come to the coast with movie ambitions.  When dressed for the kill, they could, both of them, have been an attractive pair of youngish grandmothers, what with their warpaint and mascara.

Satterlee and Hansen, however, hardly looked like “youngish grandmothers” in the courtroom. No doubt their attorneys had advised them on the need for innocent presentation:

Miss Satterlee appeared without even powder, clad in a little girl’s billowy dress and flat wedgies, and she had her hair artfully rigged in two long braids down her back caught with fetching bows.

She could have been ten. And Miss Hansen, also eschewing cosmetics, wore flat heeled shoes and a plain drab smock.

Miss Hansen was the first to take the stand. She claimed to have gone to dinner at the home of Flynn’s friend, McEvoy, where she had been given an “evil green drink” which had made her very sick. Always the gentleman, Flynn had taken her upstairs to take a “nap.” He had also helped her undress. On cross-examination, Flynn’s lawyer, the famed Jerry Geisler, inquired of Miss Hansen:

“But when you found you were not going to sleep, didn’t you try and push him away?”

Miss Hansen admitted she had not pushed him, kicked him or scratched him.

Miss Satterlee’s testimony was similar in nature except, in this case, Flynn’s unwanted advances had taken place on his yacht, the Sirocco. She stated that she had not screamed for help even though there were people nearby. She stated quaintly that she had not thought it worthwhile because: “the refrigerator was running.” With logic like that, it’s not surprising that Flynn was acquitted on both charges. Newsweek (yes they had Newsweek way back then) stated:

It happened in the best Hollywood tradition. The defendant leaped joyfully to his feet.  Spectators cheered. Flashbulbs popped…”

Flynn  was innocent. Not one seemed to be particularly put out over the not guilty verdict, not even Betsy Hansen’s mother who issued a statement from her home in Lincoln, Nebraska:

Oh well, nobody got hurt. I have no hard feeling toward Mr. Flynn. Betty is the cutest little thing you ever saw…a clean little Christian girl!

MORE ON THE TRIAL

Jurors are prone to speaking out following verdicts and the Flynn jurors were no exception. Motion Picture in conjunction  with Hollywood Magazine brings us the following:

What really convinced the jury that he was innocent?

With MOTION PICTURE-HOLLYWOOD’S policy of bringing you the inside story behind all front-page Hollywood news, we went to the individual jurors and asked them. Nine women and three men—all mature, intelligent and conscientious—sat in on the fate of Flynn, but because they are respectable citizens with families and want to avoid the spotlight, we have respected their desire for privacy by not quoting any member by name.

One of the jurors told me significantly, “It was not so much Flynn’s testimony that helped him as it was the testimony of both the girls who brought charges against him.”

betty“Their testimony proved to us that they were not always telling the truth. For instance, Betty Hansen first said that she undressed herself, and then said that Flynn had undressed her. During the preliminary hearing she said that the alleged act took place on a large bed in a large room, but on the stand she said it was a small bed in an alcove.”

The appearance of the girls did their cases no good either, according to the jurors. “There were no tears, no grief in recalling the alleged acts. We felt that a girl whose virtue had been molested would be unable to control her emotions on recalling the incident, but Betty Hansen and Peggy Satterlee were belligerent and displayed no regret.

“Besides, Mrs. Satterlee knew that her daughter was living in the apartment of a married man and was accepting money and gifts from him.”

“I felt sure,” a pleasant-faced, motherly juror told me, “that Betty Hansen first brought charges against Flynn out of hurt feelings and a sudden desire for revenge, and that when her case was weak, Peggy Satterlee was brought in.”

“Betty, on the other hand, was furious at Errol Flynn because he had paid no attention to her at Fred McEvoy’s party which she had crashed. She had come uninvited to that party with the express purpose of playing up to Mr. Flynn to obtain his help in getting into pictures…”

bathThe jury was alert, not only in weighing every word uttered in court, but in making their sage analysis of the evidence displayed. The snapshots of Peggy Satterlee in a bathing suit taken on Sunday a few hours after she said she was attacked, told them plenty. “She looked happy and carefree, not at all like a girl who had suffered a harrowing physical experience as she had claimed.”

Not a thing missed their keen scrutiny. When Peggy told how she and Cathcart-Jones had played tag one night in a mortuary and how she had placed her face next to that of a dead man, they were revolted and arrived at the conclusion that a girl who could do that must be too calloused to be as deeply hurt as she said she was.

The Judge himself admonished the jurors that a birth certificate need not be viewed as conclusive evidence.

both“We never felt that the girls were as young as they claimed,” several jurors explained. “Betty told us that she had been graduated from high school and then had gone to Teachers’ Training for two years before she came to Hollywood. Even a very bright girl—which Betty obviously was not—couldn’t have accomplished so much under the age of 17. Peggy looked and acted worldly; and on many occasions had sworn that she was older. For instance, she and her mother insisted that she was 18 when she applied for a driver’s license, and she said she was 21 when she applied for a job at a night club. Apparently she thought nothing of adjusting her age to suit the circumstances.”

One of the jurors stated that Errol Flynn’s reputation as a glamorous Hollywood star had no influence in her decision to vote for acquittal:

“Believe me,” one of the women told me, “I have seen him on the screen only once. I looked upon him as a man seeking justice, not as a dashing film star with a handsome profile…”

How can one argue with such eloquence?

THE week after Errol Flynn’s trial was over, the boys and girls who attended it and wrote it up gave him a party where the whole cast was re-enacted, amidst much merriment. The party was in payment for one Errol threw for them on the ninth floor of the Hall of Justice, while the jury was out cogitating as to his guilt or innocence. Errol had his butler bring down two cases of liquor and lots of sandwiches, and a merry time was had by all except the judge and jury. Errol also wanted time on the radio to thank the Great American Public for giving him such a fair trial. Networks wouldn’t go for it.

FLYNN’S AFTERMATH

Naturally, we can’t help wondering what happened to Fynn after the trial. It is noted that the well-known expression: “In Like Flynn” stems from his acquittal. The website For Shame! brings us the following:

Errol’s career didn’t really suffer from the trial, but rather from negative public opinion when he didn’t enlist during WWII (sidenote: not his fault, he wanted to, didn’t pass the physical, remarkable considering sword choreography prowess which you’d think the Army could use somehow). By the early 50s he’d really embraced a late-Kerouacian diet of cake and whiskey, resulting in alcoholism and weight gain.

funeralBut Errol, the scalawag, the rapscallion, had to go out with an inappropriately younger bang: at the age of 50, he met and fell in love with a FIFTEEN YEAR OLD whom he planned TO MARRY and with whom he planned to move to Jamaica. Very, very unfortunately, Errol died of a heart attack in 1959 before he could really love or marry his little island childbride. Sad.

Although the moralists among us may despise Errol Flynn for his caddish, inappropriate and downright sexist behavior (not to mention his alleged Nazi leanings), he never seemed to express any regrets for his many flaws. But what can you expect from a man who stated in his typically flippant manner:

“I like my scotch old and my woman young.”


Pennsylvania Boy Shoots Classmate in the Face (for No Reason) and Takes Selfie with Corpse

$
0
0
commentary by Patrick H. Moore
When I was young and all was well in the world , there was a popular television host named Art Linkletter who had a TV show called Art Linkletter’s House Party, which was on TV nearly forever. On the House Party, there was a popular (and no doubt amusing) segment called Kids Say the Darndest Things. Bill Cosby also hosted a show of the same name from January of 1998 until June of 2000. (I cannot resist saying that if the rumors are true, Cosby himself may have done the darndest things to older kids but that’s as far as I’m going in that direction.)

alk5Without a doubt, kids do say the darndest things, but all too often, kids also do the darndest things. For example, Mr. Linkletter’s youngest daughter Diane jumped out of a sixth floor window at her Shoreham Towers West Hollywood digs in 1969 alk7when she was 20 years old and did not survive the fall. Mr. Linkletter blamed her death/suicide on the fact that she had taken LSD on several occasions prior to jumping. Mr. Linkletter theorized that Diane had taken LSD the night before she jumped but toxicology tests proved this to be false. What is known is that she was extremely despondent during the period preceding her death. It may be no coincidence that Mr. Linkletter’s House Party ended in 1969, the same year his daughter died.
There’s are so many ways for kids to wreck themselves, and though it’s often self-inflicted, it can be turned inward or outward. An excellent recent example of a teenage boy turning his anger/ despondency outward is the case of Maxwell Marion Morton, 16, of Jeannette, Pennsylvania, a suburb of Pittsburgh with a population of just under 10,000.
alkIt seems that on Wednesday, February 4th, for unknown reasons, Maxwell shot and killed 16-year-old Ryan Mangan, also of Jeannette, at Ryan’s house, apparently with a 9 mm handgun. At present, the authorities do not know why Maxwell shot Ryan. What is known is that after shooting Ryan and before fleeing the crime scene, Maxwell took a selfie of him (shooter) and the deceased teen (victim), who was reportedly propped up in a chair. With the wisdom of youth operating overtime, Maxwell then sent the picture via Snapshot to a friend. Although Snapshot images, once viewed, apparently fade quickly into nothingness, the recipient — perhaps shocked by what he had received — had the presence of mind to save the image which he later showed to his mother.
Jill Daly of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reports that according to the Westmoreland County coroner’s office, Ryan died of a single gunshot wound. He was found in his home by his mother Rebecca Murtland at about 6 p.m. on Wednesday.

Ms. Daly writes:

alk4Rebecca Murtland, Ryan’s mother, first contacted police at about 6 p.m. Wednesday saying she had found her son dead, with a gunshot wound in the face. A detective found a 9 mm shell casing at the scene, but no gun. Also found on the victim’s phone was a photo of himself holding a semiautomatic handgun, police said.

On Thursday, the mother of the young man who received the selfie came forward and reported that “her son had a copy of a Snapchat photo sent from the accused.” Sgt. Donald Johnston of the Jeannette police department must have done a double take when he saw the photo, which “depicted the wounded victim in the chair” just as his mother found him. Perhaps our young genius wanted to get caught; in any event, he was front and center in the selfie with the victim in the background. Just to help with the identification, the name “MAXWELL” was emblazoned across the top of the photo.

alk2The, selfie recipient had apparently divulged everything to his mother; she informed the authorities that her son received telling messages from the killer, saying things like: “Told you I cleaned up the shells” and “Ryan was not the last one.” Thus, a reasonable interpretation of the message would be that Maxwell intended to go on a killing binge.

With such solid evidence, it was a snap for law enforcement to obtain a search warrant for Maxwell’s home; and sure enough there was the smoking gun, literally, tucked away under the steps in the basement. Maxwell was advised of his rights with his parents present, and then he confessed, stating that he shot Ryan Mangan, “leaving the victim dead in his room.”

alk3Westmoreland County detectives and Jeannette police have charged Maxwell with criminal homicide, first-degree murder and illegally possessing a 9 mm handgun. He was arraigned, denied bail and is being held in the county jail with a preliminary hearing is set for Feb. 19.A psychological evaluation will undoubtedly be performed, and Maxwell will need all the help he can get, given that he may well be tried as an adult. Or as the old saying goes, “Kids do the darndest things.”

 

Mean Girls at Work: Murderess in Lover’s Triangle Gets LWOP for Brutal Torture and Death of “Odd Girl Out”

$
0
0

compiled by Patrick H. Moore

In a deeply disturbing recent murder story, a Pennsylvania resident, 20-year-old Nichole “Jade” Olmstead has chosen to plead guilty to first-degree murder in the brutal death of 20-year-old Brandy Stevens-Rosine, an Ohio college student who was beaten and buried alive in a shallow grave in rural Pennsylvania. This story is not for the faint-at-heart but makes compelling reading for anyone interested in delving into the cruel depths of human nature. Dave Lohr of the Huntington Post writes:

badd7Nichole “Jade” Olmstead bragged about the torture and murder of 20-year-old Brandy Stevens-Rosine, an Ohio college student who was beaten and buried alive in a shallow grave in rural Pennsylvania.

Those and other details were released on Halloween, following a surprise decision by 20-year-old Olmstead, who had been fighting a homicide charge, to plead guilty to first-degree murder.

“Olmstead had a journal,” Crawford County District Attorney Francis Schultz told The Huffington Post on Monday. “She talked about the fact that using a shovel [to hit Stevens-Rosine in the head] was perfect — that she could see [Stevens-Rosine’s] skull and brains mixed in the dirt.”

Olmstead and her former lover, Ashley Marie Barber, yet another 20-year-old, were arrested last year and charged with one count each of criminal homicide, conspiracy to commit criminal homicide, and tampering with physical evidence in the death of Stevens-Rosine.

Stevens-Rosine’s close friend, Krysti Horvat has stated that Olmstead and Barber were lovers and that the unfortunate victim, Stevens-Rosine, had once dated Olmstead.

baddd9The victim, Stevens-Rosine, who has been described as a popular sociology student at Youngstown State University in the Ohio city of the same name, is reported to have left her Beaver Township, Ohio, home on the morning of May 17, 2012, for an impromptu meeting with Olmstead. Although the two young women had broken up, they had maintained regular contact.

Dave Lohr writes:

The reason for Stevens-Rosine’s get-together with her old flame remains unclear. According to (District Attorney) Schultz, the young woman was lured by Barber and Olmstead for a single purpose.

“These two defendants … [had] plans to kill her once she was here,” Schultz said.

baddd11In any event, the evidence shows that Stevens-Rosine drove 75 miles northeast, across the state line into Pennsylvania, to a home owned by Barber’s parents on Drake Hill Road in Crawford County, where Barber and Olmstead had been living together.

Stevens-Rosine did not return from the visit and two days later, her family reported her missing. Six days later, on May 23, 2012, authorities found Stevens-Rosine’s  partially decomposed remains in a shallow grave a few hundred yards from the residence.

The autopsy revealed that Stevens-Rosine had multiple injuries, from multiple objects, to a large percentage of her body.

At a preliminary hearing in July 2012, Pennsylvania State Police trooper Eric Mallory provided the following evidence:

badd4Mallory alleged Olmstead said she hit Stevens-Rosine four or five times in the head, and could see Stevens-Rosine’s brain protruding from the gaping wounds. According to Mallory, Barber hurt herself head-butting Stevens-Rosine, and then repeatedly pounded the victim’s head against a stump.

According to Mallory, the women said they rolled the victim into a shallow grave they had dug prior to the assault. When they found Stevens-Rosine still breathing, the trooper said, they allegedly smashed her face with a large rock and poured water into her nose and mouth to drown her.

The autopsy report states that Stevens-Rosine suffered blunt force trauma, a skull fracture and 15 lacerations to the scalp. According to Erie County forensic pathologist Eric Vey, the  immediate cause of death was suffocation from dirt in her airway. D.A. Schultz stated in open court that Stevens-Rosine had been buried alive.

*     *     *     *     *

Lurid excerpts from Olmstead’s diary/journal were read into the court record at the hearing on Thursday. In changing her plea to guilty, Olmstead — who has clearly had plenty of time to think things over — admitted her role in the 2012 slaying and expressed remorse for her crime:

“[I am] truly and deeply sorry for what happened. Brandy did not deserve what happened to her,” Olmstead said in court.

baddd10Crawford County Court of Common Pleas Judge Mark Stevens sentenced Olmstead, without delay, to life in prison without parole.

Stevens-Rosine’s friend, Krysti Horvat, told HuffPost she is happy with Olmstead’s guilty plea.

“I’m glad she pleaded guilty and allowed Brandy’s family the slightest of relief to not have to go to trial twice … It’s not easy for me to give her credit for that, but her conscious [sic] must have come back to decide to plead guilty before trial … This might be the first sign of human behavior she’s exhibited since the planning of the senseless murder,” Horvat said.

Olmstead’s attorney, John Knorr, made a similar statement toHuffPost.

“She didn’t want to make Brandy’s parents go through the trial. There’s a lot of gory details that would have been very unpleasant, including autopsy photographs. She [also] recognized this [crime] has all of the elements of first-degree murder.

Attorney Knorr also said that based on her plea, Olmstead’s life sentence is not entirely written in stone.

“The present state of the law in Pennsylvania is that she is not permitted to have parole. However, the one thing we were able to accomplish is that we agreed that if there ever were a change in the law, she would have the benefit of being able to petition the court for a sentencing hearing, at which she could present mitigating factors that might result in something less than a life sentence.”

Thus, should the Pennsylvania law be changed, Olmstead would be able to request that the change, and any sentencing relief it might afford, be applied retroactively.

*     *     *     *     *

Olmstead had been scheduled to go to trial on Nov. 12. Based on her guilty plea, the district attorney’s office withdrew all the other charges.

baddd8It remains unclear how Olmstead’s guilty plea will impact Ashley Marie Barber’s case. Contacted by HuffPost on Monday, her attorney, Robert Draudt, said he had no information to share. When HuffPost inquired  about the content of Olmstead’s May 18, 2012 journal entry that was introduced into evidence at Olmstead’s sentencing hearing, Knorr declined to discuss it.

“It’s so heinous I’d rather not repeat it,” the veteran defense attorney said. “It certainly indicated, as of that day, a lack of remorse.”

Although D.A. Schultz has chosen not to release transcripts of Olmstead’s  journal to the media, citing it as possible evidence at Barber’s trial, he did read certain excerpts from it for HuffPost on Monday including a description of how Stevens-Rosine sounded while drowning in her own blood. Olmstead also apparently recounted in writing how Barber allegedly held Stevens-Rosine down while Olmstead administered the brutal battering.

“[She wrote that the crime] is perfect,” said Schultz. “She said, ‘I don’t believe we will ever get caught.’ She [also] asks a question at the end: ‘Do I feel guilty?’ [To which she answered], ‘No, not an ounce. I am proud.’”

*     *     *     *     *

Indeed, this story is not for the faint at heart. Yet, Olmstead’s journal excerpts provide a window into the dark recesses of the murderer’s mind. What has not yet been revealed is why did Olmstead and co-defendant Ashley Marie Barber bear such animus toward the victim, Brandy Stevens-Rosine. This information, however, may well be revealed in the still unreported portions of Olmstead’s journal.

I would think that this story — based on its lurid and compelling nature — is almost certain to ultimately re-surface as a book and/or movie.

Edward Elmore Rode the Legal Railroad to 30 Years on Death Row: His Crime? Simple! He Was Black and Poor

$
0
0

by Darcia Helle

Justice Blackmun: Rather than continue to coddle the Courts delusion that the desired level of fairness has been achieved and the need for regulation eviscerated, I feel morally and intellectually obligated simply to concede that the death penalty experiment has failed.

ell18We like to say that “Justice is blind”, but justice is decided upon and meted out by people, and people are not flawless, unbiased machines. To ensure fairness, we have trials with lawyers and a “jury of our peers”. On the surface, this seems to offer an even balance for the accused and the accuser. The jury hears all the facts and no one person gets to decide a person’s fate. The letter of the law and justice prevails. An ideal system when it works. The problem is that the very same laws meant to protect the innocent sometimes hurt them instead. Jurors do not get to hear all the evidence, and what they do hear is interpreted by lawyers with an agenda. Sometimes those lawyers want to get at the truth. Sometimes they just want to win. Judges sit at the top of this legal pyramid, complete with their own very human preconceptions, ideals, and biases. In the hands of the lawyers and judges, the law is surprisingly easy to either bend or hold rigid.

ell19Aerosmith had it right when they wrote the song “Same Old Song and Dance”:

The judge let constipation go to his head

His wife’s aggravation, you’re soon enough dead.

This flawed system latched onto Edward Lee Elmore, and there he found that “innocent until proven guilty” is just a meaningless phrase.

ell16Edward Elmore was born on January 13, 1959 in the poor, black section of the racially divided town of Abbeville, South Carolina. He grew up in an environment where black people were not equal to whites. People of color only entered the ‘white sections’ of town to work, where they were treated as not much better than slave labor.

ell20Edward’s mother, Mary Ellen Gardner, had 13 children by five different men. Edward’s father is listed as Henry Elmore, though Edward’s heritage was always in doubt. Edward had lighter skin than his parents and a reddish tint to his hair. Because of this, his siblings and other children taunted him, claiming he must have a white father. Regardless, Henry Elmore was killed when Edward was just two years old, and thereafter his mother had a steady string of men visiting, none interested in being even a part-time father.

Mary drank a lot and did little to protect or nurture her children. Consequently, Edward and his siblings were left to fend for themselves in a hostile environment.

Edward’s family was poor in a way most of us can’t fathom. They moved frequently, either because of eviction or in order to avoid rent collectors. Many of their homes were little more than shacks, with no running water or electricity. The kids all picked peaches and cotton to help earn money, and they’d often spend days collecting cans to turn in for the deposits.

Climbing out of such squalid misery would have been a challenge for the smartest and most capable among us. For Edward, it would have been a miracle. When he started school at the age of six, he could not do the most basic tasks such as name colors or draw a stick figure. He spent three years in the first grade. He had a speech impediment, tics, and was teased for being slow and “dim-witted”. In second grade, his IQ measured a mere 61, classifying him with “mild mental retardation”.

Despite his inability to learn, teachers advanced him through to third and then fourth grade. In fifth grade, at 14 years old and reading at barely a second grade level, Edward tired of the teasing and dropped out of school.

ell12As an adult, Edward was not able to live on his own. He had tremendous difficulty grasping simple concepts. He never learned to tell time and, in fact, could not even draw the face of a clock. He didn’t understand the basic compass directions of north, south, east and west. Nor did he understand the concept of seasons. Maintaining a checking account was impossible because he could not do the necessary basic math. Fortunately, Edward did have one thing in his favor. By all accounts, he was a hard worker, likable, and honest. Clarence Aiken, a local contractor, hired Edward as a handyman. The job was his salvation and, eventually, his undoing.

Edward did odd jobs for the local white residents. One of those residents was the widow Dorothy Ely Edwards. She had no complaints about his work or his behavior. Indeed, the opposite was true. Dorothy was so pleased with Edward’s work that she’d asked him to return in a couple of months to touch up some paint on the window frames. This was in December 1982. In mid-January, Dorothy’s dead body was found in her home, and Edward’s world came crashing down around him.

ellDorothy Edwards had a close relationship with Jimmy Holloway, her next door neighbor. After Dorothy’s husband died, Jimmy took it upon himself to watch out for her. Dorothy gave him a key to her home, presumably for emergencies, though he seemed to use that key frequently. Jimmy’s wife didn’t drink alcohol, and so Jimmy would often go to Dorothy’s house to have a glass or two of sherry. Neighbors routinely witnessed him sneaking out his back door and scurrying across to Dorothy’s home. Many people thought there was more to Dorothy and Jimmy’s relationship, an assumption that fit with Jimmy’s reputation as a ladies’ man. There were whispers of an affair. But none of this was ever remotely questioned as the murder investigation unraveled, a fact made even more baffling given the circumstances in which her body was discovered.

ell7On January, 18, 1982, Jimmy Holloway used his key to let himself into Dorothy Edward’s home because, he claimed, he was concerned for her welfare. He knew she’d planned to leave town, to meet her boyfriend whom she had talked about marrying. But her car was still in her driveway and she wasn’t answering her phone. There was no sign of forced entry but, inside the home, Jimmy found an array of warnings. In the kitchen, Dorothy’s coffee machine was on and all the coffee in the pot had burned down to nothing. A partial denture was on the floor and, a few feet away, a pair of needle-nose pliers. One drawer was left open, with a pair of long-neck metal thongs sticking out. An empty bottle of sherry sat on the counter next to a bowl of fruit. The rest of the kitchen was spotless.

Jimmy continued through the house. He found an isolated bloody shoeprint in the dining room. In the den, the TV was on, the volume way up. Dorothy’s reading glasses had been set on the TV Guide, left open the previous evening. Nothing had been disturbed.

ell22Jimmy then moved on to Dorothy’s bedroom, where the alarm clock had been steadily beeping since early that morning. Assorted items, such as breath mints, batteries, and tissues, were strewn across the white carpet. A serrated cake spatula, its handle bloody, lay incongruously amidst perfectly aligned family photos on the dresser. The bed was neatly made, though pushed away from the wall and out of its normal position. A pool of blood saturated the carpet in front of Dorothy’s closet. The door was ajar. What Jimmy did next was odd, to say the least.

Jimmy Holloway did not turned off the empty coffee pot that was burning, he did not turn off the TV, he did not turn off the alarm clock, he did not open the closet door, and he did not call the police. Instead, Jimmy left the house and got a neighbor to return with him. Together they walked back through Dorothy’s house, with Jimmy pointing out all the oddities. Then, with the neighbor looking on, Jimmy nudged open the closet door. There they found Dorothy’s bloody body crammed inside. And finally Jimmy called the police.

ell23From here, this story becomes so unbelievable, the incompetence so complete, that the events defy explanation. Police arrived on the scene and allowed Jimmy Holloway to give them the grand tour. He pointed out everything he’d found along the way, ending with Dorothy’s body. He then showed them Dorothy’s checkbook, which he found on a table in the foyer, and showed them the register. On December 30, a check for $43 had been made out to Edward Elmore. Jimmy explained to police that Edward was a black handyman who’d recently worked for Dorothy. He expressed his concerns about this black man in this white neighborhood, working for a wealthy widow all alone in her home. And that was all it took for cops to decide Edward Elmore was guilty of murder.

Jimmy Holloway was never questioned in regards to Dorothy Edwards’ murder. Their relationship was never looked into. Neighbors were not questioned. Jimmy’s odd behavior was never considered. He was not asked about an alibi. He was not once considered a suspect by the all-white police department.

ell21But all that is just the tip of the insanity here. Evidence was overlooked, lost, and deliberately hidden if it did not fit with the detective’s determination to “hang” Edward Elmore as rapist, robber, and vicious murderer. This continued to be the story told, despite the unavoidable fact that nothing had been stolen, that the issue of rape was questionable at best, and that the evidence had to be manipulated and/or ignored in order to point at Edward as the killer.

Edward Elmore, a poor, uneducated, mentally-retarded black man in a racially backward town was given a white court-appointed attorney who’d already decided he was guilty. The details of his so-called trial would be laughable if the situation wasn’t tragic. Edward, in his child-like confusion, proclaimed his innocence. He was sentenced to death.

It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a condemned man claiming innocence to get a new trial.

This story easily could have ended this way, with Edward Elmore executed for a crime he did not commit. Had anyone along the way, from detectives to lawyers to judges, done his/her job properly, Edward’s innocence would have been obvious. But, not only did they not do their jobs properly, they did all they could to suppress evidence that would have exonerated Edward at the start. He was black, he was poor, and therefore he was guilty.

ell9J. Christopher Jensen is a prestigious New York City corporate attorney who signed on to a program launched by the American Bar Association in 1986, which was recruiting lawyers to handle the appeals of death row inmates.

In a telling quote, Mr. Jensen compares Elmore’s case with that of O.J. Simpson:

You want to draw a perfect parallel. Look at these two trials. Two guys charged with murder. No eyewitnesses.  Lots of forensic evidence blood, fingerprints, hair. Elmore gets a three-day trial, no meaningful defense. Simpsons goes on for months. Look what money gets you.

ell10Jensen eventually brought Diana Holt, a young defense attorney with a checkered past and unshakable idealism, into the case. Although Jensen was her Ms. Holt’s mentor, and as one of Elmore’s appeal lawyers, was there with her during the hearings, but she did most of the casework.

ell13What Ms. Jensen went through would test anyone’s faith in our justice system. The case is far too complicated for me to adequately represent here. In Raymond Bonner’s book about the case, Anatomy of Injustice: A Murder Case Gone Wrong, the author walks us through multiple appeals that were denied on technicalities of law, where the enormity of the corruption is truly mind blowing. Along with the corruption comes the legal nightmare that keeps a convicted man ensnared despite of his innocence. At one point during the process, Justice Michael Wolff was appalled to find the Constitution would be used to knowingly execute an innocent man. In his disbelief, he says:

“To make sure we are clear on this, if we find in a particular case DNA absolutely excludes somebody as the murderer, then we must execute them anyway, if we can’t find an underlying constitutional violation at their trial?”

The reply was, “Yes, Your Honor.”

ell4Diana Holt truly became Edward Elmore’s guardian angel. She persevered, when most other reasonable people would have given up. A full 30 years after Edward’s arrest, almost everyone involved acknowledged his innocence, yet he remained in prison. Finally, though, Diana Holt dredged up enough of the lost evidence, proved enough of the incompetence, and made enough noise to get Edward a new trial. Edward could have been freed, had the State dropped the case there. Incredibly, the prosecutor, who happened to be the son of the original prosecutor, wasn’t about to admit defeat and announced he would retry Edward Elmore for murder. Part of this was due to pride, and part was to keep Edward from suing the state for wrongful imprisonment.

ell2At this point, Diana Holt was exhausted and Edward Elmore had been on death row for 30 years. Evidence was tainted. Many people involved at the start were now dead. The decision was made to negotiate. Edward was given the option to take the Alford plea, which meant he would plead guilty without admitting guilt. Doing so would allow him to walk free. And so he did. On March 2, 2012, despite overwhelming evidence of his innocence, Edward Elmore pleaded guilty to the murder of Dorothy Edwards.

Had it not been for the determination and dedication of one woman, the State would have executed Edward Elmore for the crime of being a poor, mentally retarded black male. How many others like him, who aren’t fortunate enough to have someone like Diana Holt on their side, now sit on death row?

[Prosecutor Billy] Garrett no longer supports the death penalty. He had seen how the system was abused and subject to manipulation. Not human error, human manipulation, he said. If the death penalty could be imposed in a case like this, without a fair trial, then we dont have the right as a civilized society to pass this judgment.

 

Please click to below to view Darcia’s Helle’s many excellent posts:

Jovial Private Bartender Snaps; Assaults and Drags Obnoxious 84-Year-Old Club Patron

Frank Lloyd Wright and the Great Gasoline Mass Murder

Edward Elmore Rode the Legal Railroad to 30 Years on Death Row: His Crime? Simple! He Was Black and Poor

 “The Wrong Carlos”: Non-Violent Manchild Executed for Murder He Did Not Commit

The Electric Chair Nightmare: An Infamous and Agonizing History

Autopsies: Truth, Fiction and Maura Isles and Her 5-Inch-Heels

Don’t Crucify Me, Dude! Just Shoot Me Instead! Spartacus and Death by Crucifixion

To Burn or Not to Burn? Auto-Da-Fé Is Not Good for Women or Children!

The Disgraceful Entrapment of Jesse Snodgrass: Keep the Narcs Out of Our Schools

Why Should I Believe You? The History of the Polygraph

“Don’t Behead Me, Dude!”: The Story of Beheading and the Invention of the Guillotine

Aileen Wuornos, America’s First High-Profile Female Serial Killer, Never Had a Chance

The Terror of ISO: A Descent into Madness

Al Capone Could Not Bribe the Rock: Alcatraz, Fortress of Doom

Cyberspace, Darknet, Murder-for-Hire and the Invisible Black Machine

darcDarcia Helle lives in a fictional world with a husband who is sometimes real. Their house is ruled by spoiled dogs and cats and the occasional dust bunny.

Suspense, random blood splatter and mismatched socks consume Darcia’s days. She writes because the characters trespassing through her mind leave her no alternative. Only then are the voices free to haunt someone else’s mind.

Join Darcia in her fictional world: www.QuietFuryBooks.com

The characters await you.

 

Sexy Bob Crane of Hogan’s Heroes Was Bludgeoned to Death in 1978. His Mysterious Murder Remains Unsolved

$
0
0

by Patrick H. Moore

The list of radio and television personalities who have had their lives cut short by murder includes Bob Crane, the incredibly popular Los Angeles morning radio personality, circa 1960, and the star of “Hogan’s Heroes.” Crane was bludgeoned to death in a Scottsdale, Arizona hotel room in 1978, a crime that remains unsolved to this day.

According to Wikipedia:

Crane began his career as a disc jockey in New York and Connecticut before moving to Los Angeles where he hosted the number-one rated morning withgunshow. In the early 1960s, he moved into acting. Crane is best known for his performance as Colonel Robert E. Hogan in the CBS sitcom Hogan’s Heroes. The series aired from 1965 to 1971, and Crane received two Primetime Emmy Award nominations for his work on the series.

After Hogan’s Heroes ended, Crane’s career declined. He became frustrated with the few roles he was being offered and began doing dinner theater. In 1975, he returned to television in the NBC series The Bob Crane Show. The series received poor ratings and was canceled after 13 weeks.

While on tour for his play Beginner’s Luck in June 1978, Crane was found bludgeoned to death in his Scottsdale apartment, a murder that remains officially unsolved.

While starring as Colonel Hogan, Crane was introduced to John Henry Carpenter, a regional sales manager for Sony Electronics, who had many high end clients. The two men struck up a friendship and began drinking together at bars. As a celebrity, Crane attracted women with relative ease and was soon introducing Carpenter as his manager. Before long, they began videotaping their sexual encounters. Although Crane’s son Robert later claimed “that all of the women were aware of the videotaping and consented to it,” this is highly debatable. In any event, over the years, Carpenter, who later became national sales manager at Akai, “arranged his business trips to coincide with Crane’s dinner theater touring schedule so that the two could continue seducing and videotaping women. At some point, however, the friendship began to deteriorate.”

deadlyIn June 1978, Crane was living in the Winfield Place Apartments in Scottsdale, Arizona while appearing in Beginner’s Luck at the Windmill Dinner Theatre. On the afternoon of June 29 Crane’s co-star Victoria Ann Berry found his body in his apartment after he failed to show up for a lunch meeting. Crane had been bludgeoned to death with a weapon that was never found, though investigators believed it to be a camera tripod. An electrical cord had been tied around his neck.

 

The Murder Investigation:

Right from the start, Crane’s estranged friend John Henry Carpenter was a prime suspect. An episode of A&E’s Cold Case Files reports that the “police officers who arrived at the scene of the crime noted that Carpenter called the apartment several times and did not seem surprised that the police were there, which raised suspicions.” Several blood smears that matched Crane’s blood type were found in Carpenter’s rental car. DNA testing, of course, was not available in 1978 and Maricopa County Attorney Charles F. Hyder declined to file charges based on what he considered to be insufficient evidence.

relaxThe Maricopa County Attorney re-opened Crane’s murder case in 1990. The investigators reexamined and retested the evidence found in June 1978. This was in the early days of DNA testing and although the blood found in Carpenter’s rental car was tested, the results were inconclusive. A detective working the case, Jim Raines, “discovered an evidence photograph of the car’s interior that appeared to show a piece of brain tissue.” By this point, the blood and tissue samples which had been found in Carpenter’s car the day after Crane’s murder had been lost “but an Arizona judge ruled that the new evidence was admissible.” Carpenter was arrested and charged with Crane’s murder in June of 1992.

 

The Trial:

Carpenter’s trial was delayed until 1994. At the proceedings, Crane’s son Robert testified that:

“in the weeks before his father’s death, Crane had repeatedly expressed a desire to sever his friendship with Carpenter. Carpenter had become, “a hanger-on,” he said, and “a nuisance to the point of being obnoxious”. The night before his death, Crane reportedly called Carpenter and ended their friendship.

Predictably, Carpenter’s defense attorneys attacked the prosecution’s case as circumstantial and inconclusive. They, no doubt fallaciously, “denied the claim that Carpenter and Crane were on bad terms just before the slaying, and they labeled the determination that a camera tripod was the murder weapon as sheer speculation, based on Carpenter’s occupation.”  Displaying convincing logic, however, they disputed the claim that the rediscovered photo showed brain tissue, pointing out that the authorities “did not have the tissue itself.”

tabIn what was perhaps most damaging to the prosecution, the defense was allowed to introduce as evidence that “Crane had been videotaped and photographed in compromising sexual positions with numerous women.” This, of course, implied that either a jealous person or someone fearing blackmail could well have been the killer.

Based on this and the other evidence, Carpenter was found not guilty. He maintained his innocence until his death on September 4, 1998 and Crane’s murder remains officially unsolved.

In 2002, “Crane’s life and murder were depicted in the film Auto Focus, directed by Paul Schrader and starring Greg Kinnear as Crane.” The film was based on Robert Graysmith’s book, The Murder of Bob Crane: Who Killed the Star of Hogan’s Heroes?, portrayed Crane “as a happily married, church-going family man and popular Los Angeles disc jockey who suddenly becomes a Hollywood celebrity, and subsequently declines into sex addiction.”

There is, of course, a moral to this story which goes something like this:

plaqueIf, given the opportunity to bed an endless array of beautiful and exciting women, and if you lack the self-control to “just say no,” it is strongly recommended that you do not videotape the evidence. This compulsion to record one’s misdeeds is, of course, a modern phenomenon, and would appear to stem from a combination of prurient fascination, the desire to parade one’s conquests, and, perhaps, a measure of underlying guilt leading to what is ultimately a public confession.

Zeitoun Unbound: Did Hurricane Katrina Hero Try to Kill His Wife?

$
0
0

by BJW Nashe

Abdulrahman Zeitoun’s roller coaster ride during the past decade — through the ups and downs of running a business, surviving a hurricane disaster, enduring injustice, and achieving fame — came to a screeching halt in July 2012 when he was arrested for assaulting his ex-wife, Kathy Zeitoun, and then charged with plotting to have her murdered.

The Syrian-American painting and building contractor from New Orleans gained renown in 2009 as the subject of Dave Eggers’s award-winning book, Zeitoun, which detailed both his heroic actions and his wrongful arrest and detention as a “looter” and “possible terrorist” during the Hurricane Katrina disaster in 2005. Eggers’s narrative ended on a positive note: we were left with a good deal of hope that Zeitoun and his family will continue down their own unique path of personal integrity and hard-won prosperity.

Zeitoun2Instead, everything went to hell for Abdulrahman Zeitoun. He became abusive, and his marriage fell apart. He was arrested twice for assaulting Kathy, then serious criminal charges were filed. Zeitoun’s July 2013 trial for solicitation of first-degree murder and attempted first-degree murder of his ex-wife ended with him being acquitted on both counts. Yet the abusive behavior underlying the murder charges have cast a heavy shadow over his life and reputation. Most of us who first learned of Zeitoun in Eggers’s remarkable book are left wondering, what went wrong?

Prior to Hurricane Katrina, Zeitoun was an immigrant success story. He was born and raised in a large family of hard-working over-achievers in Jableh, a dusty fishing town on the coast of Syria. As a young man, he became accomplished in many trades, including sea-faring, fishing, and carpentry. In 1988, he traveled to the U.S. on an oil tanker bound from Saudi Arabia to Houston, Texas. He decided to stay in the States, and began working for a contractor in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Due to his strong work ethic and multifarious skills, he became moderately successful. Soon he was in New Orleans managing his own team of painters and contractors. He formed his own business, Zeitoun Painting Contractors LLC.

Zeitoun3Zeitoun met Kathy in 1988 and they were married six years later. She was raised in a Southern Baptist family in Baton Rouge, but converted to Islam soon after her first marriage ended. When she met Abdulrahman, she was a 21 year-old single mom, living with her young son, Zachary. Zeitoun was older than her, at 34, but they hit it off well. She found him to be good husband material: kind, ambitious, and devout in his faith. He found her to be more than his match in terms of smarts and savvy. She was well-read, quick-witted, and tough-minded. Eggers portrays the Zeitouns in a loving partnership — a far cry from the violence and abuse that would later come to dominate their story. By the summer of 2005, the couple is raising three young daughters in addition to Zachary, and both are working tirelessly at running the family business. They also own and manage half a dozen rental properties in New Orleans. Life is challenging, but they are getting ahead.

Everything changed with the onslaught of Hurricane Katrina. Eggers tells us what happened to the Zeitouns in simple, straightforward prose. No literary tricks are required, because the story is so remarkable in itself. Here we have a man and a woman desperately struggling to endure two calamities: the great devastation brought by the storm, and the disastrous failures of the agencies and officials who were supposed to bring relief to the storm’s victims.

Katrina2As the storm approached New Orleans in late August 2005, Kathy decided to take their four children to Baton Rouge, while Abdulrahman insisted on staying behind to guard their home. Barricaded safely inside, Zeitoun assumed he had made it through the peak of the storm unscathed. When the levees protecting the city were breached, however, Zeitoun’s neighborhood was flooded with more than ten feet of water that reached up to the second floor of most houses. Zeitoun began exploring the city in a secondhand canoe, distributing any supplies he could gather, rescuing and ferrying neighbors to higher ground, and caring for abandoned dogs.

Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in New OrleansOn September 6, Zeitoun’s humanitarian efforts were shut down when he and three of his companions were arrested at one of Zeitoun’s rental houses by a group of U.S. Army National Guardsmen and police officers. Abdulrahman’s ensuing ordeal is emblematic of the government’s fundamentally flawed and inhumane response to Hurricane Katrina. Rather than focusing on storm relief for the victims, law enforcement working under the umbrella of FEMA — which after 9-11 had been folded into the Department of Homeland Security — approached the disaster zone primarily as an anti-terrorism operation. Search and rescue missions became secondary to patrolling the “war zone” to round up “suspects” and maintain “law and order.” Since they were working in a “state of emergency,” federal, state, and local officials were all too willing to set constitutional rights aside. For someone like Abdulrahman Zeitoun, New Orleans may as well have been Baghdad.

Gulf Oil SpillCaught up in this terrible dragnet, Zeitoun and his friends were detained for three days in a makeshift jail at a Greyhound bus station, where their cells were little more than crudely constructed cages. Then they were transferred to Elayn Hunt Correctional Center in nearby St. Gabriel, Louisiana. Here Zeitoun was held for 20 additional days without being formally charged with a crime or given a court appearance. Meanwhile he was physically and verbally abused as he was interrogated as a terrorist suspect. He witnessed other detainees being similarly mistreated. He and his friends were held in segregated cells, denied lawyers, provided no medical attention, and prohibited from using phones. Zeitoun was unable to contact his family. His wife thought he had somehow disappeared. He was unsure how many weeks, months, or even years he might be kept locked up.

Zeitoun was finally charged with looting in the amount of $500, and bail was set at $75,000, ten times the normal amount for the crime. Several officials refused to disclose to Kathy Zeitoun the location of his public hearing, telling her that the information was “private.” She was finally able to track him down, post his bail and pick him up from Hunt Correctional Center. Once there, she barely recognized her husband. He had lost 20 pounds, his hair had grown shaggy and gray, and he looked like a sad old man. Here is Eggers’s account of their reunion:

“A few minutes later he was free. He walked to her and she ran to him. They held each other for a long moment. She could feel his shoulder blades, his ribs. His neck seemed so thin and fragile, his arms skeletal. She pulled back, and his eyes were the same — green, long-lashed, touched with honey — but they were tired, defeated. She had never seen this in him. He had been broken.”

Zeitoun1Upon his release from prison, Zeitoun returned home to find his house destroyed, with the carcasses of the family dogs rotting in an upstairs room. One of his rental properties had been looted, because police had left it unlocked after their search. It was difficult for Zeitoun to get his wallet and ID back; the authorities insisted that they be kept as “evidence.” When Kathy managed to convince an assistant DA to return the wallet, all of the cash, business cards, and credit cards were missing — or should we say, “looted.”

The three friends taken into custody with Zeitoun fared far worse. They were incarcerated for longer periods of time — five, six, and eight months — before they were eventually released. One of them, who had been carrying $10,000 in cash to evacuate New Orleans with, never saw his money again. This too was apparently “looted.” All charges against these men were eventually dropped.

Dave EggersPost-Katrina, the Zeitouns struggled to pick up the pieces and move on with their lives. Eggers explains how they lived in seven different apartments and houses while their home was gutted, rebuilt, and expanded. The couple steadily regained control over their painting and contracting business. Yet there were problems. Abdulrahman’s return to full health was slow, and he continued to struggle with anger and shame over his arrest. He was fearful of any further encounters with police. Islamophobia had always been a factor in their lives, especially in the tense months following 9-11. After Zeitoun’s arrest, however, it was difficult not to feel unjustly persecuted. On top of all this, Kathy began experiencing digestive tract problems and cognitive difficulties. She had trouble remembering things. Sometimes she forgot how to use the computer, or couldn’t understand what people were saying to her. She was told these were most likely symptoms related to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

The Zeitouns wanted to put the whole hurricane episode behind them, but were unsure how to do so. Encouraged by friends, they hired a lawyer to pursue a civil suit against various local, state, and federal agencies. Then they were basically told to get in line. New Orleans was no longer literally underwater, but the city was now flooded with thousands of lawsuits just like the Zeitouns’.

In spite of these great difficulties, Eggers closes his book with a meditation on Abdulrahman Zeitoun’s hope for building a better future:

“We can only do the work, he tells Kathy, and his children, and his crew, his friends, anyone he sees. So let us get up early and stay late, and, brick by brick and block by block, let us get that work done. If he can picture it, it can be. This has been the pattern of his life: ludicrous dreams followed by hours and days and years of work and then a reality surpassing his wildest hopes and expectations. And so why should this be any different?”

Dave Eggers2Zeitoun was published in 2009 by McSweeny’s, Eggers’s own independent publishing company. It went on to win the National Book Award as well as a host of other honors, and is widely considered to be a masterpiece of nonfiction narrative, as well as a leading account of the Hurricane Katrina disaster. All author proceeds of the book went to the Zeitoun Foundation, established by the Zeitoun family, Eggers, and McSweeny’s. Jonathan Demme purchased the movie rights, and planned to turn the story into an animated feature film.

Meanwhile, Abdulrahman and Kathy’s marriage came unglued. It is unclear exactly why the relationship deteriorated. In any case, the loving husband in Eggers’s book turned monstrous. In March 2011, police arrested Abdulrahman for allegedly beating Kathy and threatening to kill her in front of their four children. After that incident, Kathy asked the district attorney’s office to reduce the charges from domestic-abuse battery to negligent injuring. She has since testified that she felt a lot of “pressure from friends and family, because of the book, because of the movie, because of our business reputation.”

Domestic AbuseThe couple was divorced in February 2012. Later that year, on July 25, 2012, Abdulrahman was arrested for allegedly attacking Kathy with a tire-iron on Prytania Street in New Orleans. Once Zeitoun was behind bars, more serious charges began piling up. A man named Donald Pugh, who was imprisoned with Zeitoun at Orleans Parish Prison, told authorities that Zeitoun offered him $20,000 to kill his ex-wife. The plan, according to Pugh, was simple. Pugh was soon to be released from prison. Once outside, he was to call Kathy and ask to see one of the family’s rental properties. After meeting her there, he could kill her. Pugh said Zeitoun also told him to buy a “throwaway phone” and take some pictures to confirm she was dead.

Instead of pursuing lesser charges of domestic-abuse battery or aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, prosecutors decided to charge Zeitoun with solicitation of first-degree murder and attempted first-degree murder of his ex-wife based primarily on Pugh’s testimony. This turned out to be a mistake. Zeitoun waved the right to a jury trial, and it was relatively easy for his defense attorneys to cast doubt on Pugh’s credibility.

As he issued his verdict of not guilty on both counts, Judge Frank Marullo criticized prosecutors for relying on the testimony of Pugh, a self-described thief who has been imprisoned in four separate states, and who lied to his child’s mother about his real name for the duration of their five year relationship. “That guy is a liar,” Judge Marullo said. “He has no credibility at all. I’m surprised the state put him on the stand at all. That’s an injustice.”

Relatives of Kathy Zeitoun reportedly stood up and rushed out of the courtroom as soon as Marullo read the verdict. “It is what it is. It’s our system,” said her brother, who asked to be identified only as Gino. He said he would try to keep his sister safe from her ex-husband with “restraining orders, whatever we need to do.”

hi2Kathy’s own testimony pointed to a far deeper and more troubling pattern of domestic abuse than many of us who knew the Zeitouns strictly from Eggers’s book would have thought possible. Her statements indicated that she suffered abuse from the beginning of their marriage in 1994, up until the storm, and then even worse in the aftermath. “The first time he attacked me I kept everything quiet,” she said. “I felt that gave him the ability to do it again.” When Assistant District Attorney Lauren Faveret asked Kathy in court whether she would be fearful for her life if her ex-husband was released, she replied, “I’d be dead.”

The precise reasons for Zeitoun’s increasingly violent behavior remain unclear. Has he been suffering from a PTSD-related breakdown? Was he unable to accept the fact that his marriage was ending, and thus driven to escalating outbursts? Is he merely following the pattern of most domestic abusers, in which the problem only worsens over time? These are all plausible explanations, but we simply do not know for sure. Kathy has described her husband becoming more angry and violent in the years following Hurricane Katrina. She says her husband’s faith has taken on more radical overtones. Several of these factors — a prior pattern of abusive, stress, divorce, religion — may have joined together to create a potent psychological cocktail.

Dave EggersDave Eggers, meanwhile, has been taking some heat during the past two years for refusing to answer any questions pertaining to Zeitoun’s legal troubles, especially in regard to how the domestic abuse allegations might conflict with his portrayal in the award-winning book. On December 9, 2012, Salon.com posted a story (originally printed in the L.A. Review of Books) by Victoria Patterson titled, “Did Dave Eggers Get ‘Zeitoun’ Wrong?” On December 20, Sara Foss at Daily Gazette.com was emphatic in her skepticism: “The criminal charges against Zeitoun make me question everything Eggers has ever written…” On September 12, 2013, The Philadelphia Review of Books demanded answers from Eggers:

“The answer to a simple question – did you know anything about the abuse while reporting your book? – might help us understand what to take from a work that claims to tell us something important about Islam and the justice system and the United States in the early 21st century. Was Zeitoun the noble man Eggers presents in his book or was that portrayal a simplistic literary perversion? Did Zeitoun suffer a post-traumatic stress reaction after his detainment so severe that he could not function as the good man he once was?

“Zeitoun, the man, is a private person, not beholden to the public. But Eggers shared his creation with the world and should care enough to help readers put his work into perspective.”

hiIn re-reading Zeitoun, however, I find little to support the claim that Eggers presented his subject as a saint or a noble hero. In fact, Abdulrahman comes across as human-all-too-human. Granted, he’s no wife-beater. Yet, in addition to all of his virtues, Eggers plainly describes Zeitoun’s disagreements with his wife, which involved the kind of squabbling many couples are quite familiar with — probably even more heated than most. And Eggers shows us that Zeitoun is a stubborn man at times, and a steadfast workaholic. Moreover, Eggers states outright that following his arrest and detention, Zeitoun was struggling with anger and despair. He describes both Abdulrahman and Kathy as “broken.” Even though Eggers ends their story on a positive note — because he clearly cares for them — he is not asserting that their success is guaranteed, because they are such noble individuals. He might hope so, but he has shown us two imperfect beings who have been deeply scarred by their experiences.

So I think it is unfair to accuse Eggers of suppressing information or whitewashing Abdulrahman’s character, simply because he does not want to wade into a controversial legal matter. It is not that difficult to understand how Eggers could work with the Zeitouns on this project and still be unaware of any domestic abuse going on behind closed doors in the Zeitoun home. Families often hide this kind of problem for months and years at a time. Eggers was telling their hurricane story, not investigating their personal lives.

More relevant than what Eggers did or did not get right, is the way in which Zeitoun’s unfolding story forces us to acknowledge that people can be very complex. It is entirely possible for an individual to serve as a brave humanitarian in one set of circumstances, and then turn around and act like a villain or a madman in another set of circumstances. Moreover, given the traumatic nature of Zeitoun’s hurricane experiences, it is not all that surprising that he would have serious difficulties down the road. Hopefully, his pride is no longer standing in the way of him admitting that he needs help.

hi3Rather than criticizing Dave Eggers or demonizing Zeitoun, we would do better to focus on the huge problem of domestic violence in our society. Why didn’t anybody know about the pattern of abuse Kathy had suffered? Why did she feel that she needed to put up with abuse for so long in a relationship? What was wrong with her husband? Why did he feel compelled to abuse her? How did his wrongful arrest exacerbate the problem? How does the criminal justice system in general contribute to the problem? Does religious fundamentalism play a role? How can we stop this from happening in so many American homes?

From this whole incredible saga, only one thing is certain: on a whole range of issues — immigration, extreme weather, emergency response, wrongful arrest, Islamophobia, the War on Terror, PTSD, domestic violence, and murder trials — Abdulrahman Zeitoun has left us with an awful lot to think about.

Oklahoma High School Student Brandi Blackbear Suspended for ‘Casting a Spell’?

$
0
0

compiled by Patrick H. Moore

 

Exhibit I:

In 2000, Brandi Blackbear was a student at Union Intermediate High School in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma. She wrote horror stories in the style of Stephen King, dressed in a slightly Goth-like way, and was not afraid to be herself, or to stand up to bullying by popular kids. Brandi’s otherness engendered hostility toward her from certain groups among her school’s culture. False stories of threats of violence were circulated, and the combination of her writing and the authorities’ natural hyper-awareness following the Columbine massacre led to her being suspended. When some of her fellow students later saw her checking out a book on world religions, including Wicca (as research for her stories), they immediately branded her a witch, and eventually accused her of casting a spell that made a teacher sick. Fear of her spread through much of the school, and she was suspended for a second time.

 

Exhibit II:

brand6 According to an ABC News article dated Oct. 28, 2000, an Oklahoma high school suspended a 15-year-old student after accusing her of casting a magic spell that caused a teacher to become sick, lawyers for the student said on Friday.

The American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in Tulsa, Oklahoma, on behalf of student Brandi Blackbear, charging that the assistant principal of Union Intermediate High School in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, suspended her for 15 days last December for supposedly casting a spell. The ACLU does not accept the notion that a charge of “casting a spell” is sufficient grounds for suspension.

The suit also charged the Tulsa-area Union Public Schools with repeatedly violating Blackbear’s civil rights by seizing the notebooks she used to write horror stories and barring her from drawing or wearing signs of the pagan religion Wicca.

“It’s hard for me to believe that in the year 2000 I am walking into court to defend my daughter against charges of witchcraft brought by her own school,” said Timothy Blackbear, Brandi’s father.

Joann Bell, executive director of the ACLU’s Oklahoma chapter, said the “outlandish accusations” had made Blackbear’s life at school unbearable. Bell simply refuses to believe that Brandi’s alleged “spell” actually made the teacher sick:

“I, for one, would like to see the so-called evidence this school has that a 15-year-old girl made a grown man sick by casting a magic spell,” Bell said.

Unsurprisingly, a lawyer for the school district declined to comment.

brand8The lawsuit is simple enough. It alleges that Blackbear was summoned to the office of Assistant Principal Charlie Bushyhead last December after a teacher fell ill, and was questioned about her interest in Wicca.

According to the lawsuit, Brandi Blackbear had read a library book about Wicca beliefs and, under aggressive interrogation by Bushyhead, said she might be a Wiccan. In fact, Blackbear is a Roman Catholic, according to the newspaper Tulsa World.

“The interview culminated with Defendant Bushyhead accusing Plaintiff, Brandi Blackbear, of casting spells causing (a teacher at the school) … to be sick and to be hospitalized,” the lawsuit said.

The lawsuit stated that because of the “unknown cause” of the teacher’s illness, Bushyhead advised the 15-year-old girl “that she was an immediate threat to the school and summarily suspended her for what he arbitrarily determined to be a disruption of the education process.”

*     *     *     *     *

The ACLU is, of course, on solid ground in deriding the notion that Brandi could have made the teacher sick. But when you think about it, the really scary thing is that Assistant Principal Charlie Bushyhead and other authorities as well members of the student body and god knows who else may ACTUALLY BELIEVE that Brandi’s spell knocked the props out from under the teacher.

 

Exhibit III:

A July 2002 post from the Freedom Forum discusses the U.S. District Court’s decision:

Brandi Blackbear, a senior-to-be at Union Intermediate High School, has lost her lawsuit that claimed she was suspended because of her interest in the Wicca religion.

brand7A July 18th order by U.S. District Judge Claire Eagan said neither of Blackbear’s two suspensions in 1999 violated her constitutional rights.

Eagan said Blackbear testified during a deposition that she is not, has never been and has never wanted to be a Wiccan. The judge also said Blackbear admitted that the defendants have not done anything to keep her from practicing any religion.

“In view of this testimony, the court finds that Brandi does not hold a sincere belief in the religion of Wicca,” Eagan wrote in the order.

Union Public Schools attorney Doug Mann was much harsher and called the lawsuit “absolutely ridiculous.”

District Superintendent Cathy Burden seemed perturbed and perhaps a bit embarrassed by the whole matter.  She the case became an “international media event” that put Union in an unfair light. And Ms. Burden was worried about financial drain. The “frivolous lawsuit,” she said, cost the district more than $100,000 in legal fees.

Judge Eagan’s order also said Blackbear has admitted that religion played no role in the decision to discipline her in December 1999.

The judge’s decision supports Brandi’s suspensions on the grounds she was “disrupting the educational process.”

Cathy Burden set the record straight (at least in her mind) by stating that the July 18th suspension had nothing to do with religion and everything to do with Blackbear’s “terrorizing” students. Burden also said the whole “religious freedom” allegation appeared to be a ploy to make the lawsuit more exciting to the media.

brand3So how did Brandi terrorize the other students? Simple, two of Blackbear’s classmates had alleged they were “fearful” because she allegedly was claiming to be a witch and to possess the power to harm people by casting spells on them, the order states.

Brandi’s terrorist threats consisted of her allegedly claiming she was a witch who could harm others by putting spells on them.

Now it seems to me that for the threats to be taken seriously, there would have had to have been some possibility that Brandi could actually carry them out.  To carry them out, Brandi  would have had to have been a witch, and an effective one at that — someone capable of casting spells that produce results.

But if she is not a witch (a member of Wiccan), and the court held that she is not, then it follows that the threats are completely empty — they are not actually terrorist threats at all but simply Brandi making statements that at most could be construed as meaningless threats. Meaningless not terrorist!

Therefore, unless something is escaping me, it seems clear that Brandi’s suspension was uncalled for. She didn’t really do anything but talk. She was wrongly suspended no matter how you look at it, unless she made violent threats, and there appears to be no evidence that she did.

*     *     *     *     *

Blackbear’s attorney John M. Butler said he thinks the order may not be “exactly correct” on those points and said his client’s purported statements may have been “taken out of context.” Butler also said an appeal is probable and expressed optimism that Blackbear will prevail at that level.

The good news is that Burden said Blackbear is now a “successful student in our district.”

 

Exhibit IV:

BLACKBEARClaire of PaganCentric followed the case from start to finish. Here she provides some very salient details that the other sources seem to have ignored:

The lawsuit was for $10 million which Brandi’s parents thought was too high. The ACLU said it had to be that high or it would not be taken seriously. Then a perhaps surprising thing happened. The school offered a settlement and the Blackbears refused to accept it. They turned down the money even though they needed it. What they really wanted was to have their story heard in court to inform the public that the school had mistreated Brandi.

When the judge ruled to dismiss the charges rather than going to trial, she ordered the Blackbears to pay $6000 in court fees, which they could not afford. Eventually it was agreed to drop the fees if the Blackbears dropped their appeal.

*     *     *     *     *

So what actually happened here was that Brandi Blackbear was accused of being a witch by Assistant Principal Bushyhead and at least two students. By being a witch, at least in Bushyhead’s eyes, Brandi had disrupted the educational process which in turn led to her suspension.

So she was suspended for being a witch even though — according to the Federal judge — she was not and had never been a witch.

It all seems like much ado about nothing except for the fact Brandi was unjustly suspended because of narrow-minded thinking on the part of the authorities. The unhealthy message that was delivered that is that if you are a young person and if you are different, you may be seen as persona non grata and stigmatized. It may even lead to your suspension. And that bogus suspension will be upheld in Federal court.

Mamas, don’t let your babies grow up to be witches. And if it’s somehow unavoidable, teach them to keep it on the downlow.

England’s Most Notorious Child Killers: Myra Hindley & Ian Brady

$
0
0

by Bob Couttie

Ruth Ellis was the last woman to be hanged in England, in 1955. The last man to be executed is a coin toss between Peter Anthony Allen and Gwynne Owen Evans who were simultaneously dispatched on 13 August 1964. But for a quirk of timing it would have been Myra Hindley and Ian Brady, the Moors Murderers.

From July 1963 to October 1965 Ian Brady sexually assaulted and murdered four children with the help of his girlfriend Myra Hindley and buried their bodies on the desolate Saddleworth Moors near Manchester. They were finally caught after Brady involved Hindley’s brother-in-law, David Smith, in the killing of 17-years old Edward Evans. Smith went to the police who searched Brady’s house and found evidence of two of the earlier killings. In 1987 Hindley confessed to two further killings, that of Pauline Reade and Keith Bennett.

landlFirst to die was Pauline Reade. On July 12, 1963 Hindley lured the 16-year old friend of her younger sister into her van while Brady followed on a motorbike. Hindley told the girl that she wanted help finding a glove lost on Saddleworth Moor. As they arrived at the moor, Brady pulled up on his motorcycle and went with Pauline to supposedly look for the ‘lost glove’ while Hindley waited in the van.

Pauline was sexually assaulted and her throat was cut. Together, Brady and Hindley buried the body.

Four months later Hindley picked up 12-year old John Kilbride in a hired car. While pretending to drive him home Hindley again used the excuse of looking for a lost glove on the moors. Again, Hindley waited in the car while Brady lead the boy off, sexually assaulted him and strangled him with a piece of string after trying to slit his throat.

Myra_at_John_Kilbride's_grave As a souvenir, Brady took a photograph of Hindley sitting at the edge of the grave with her dog, Puppet.

The third victim was 12 year old Keith Bennett. Brady and Hindley’s MO was the same: Keith was lured into Hindley’s vehicle and taken to the moors under the pretext of looking for a lost glove. Again Brady sexually assaulted the boy and strangled him.

The body has yet to be found.

Victim number four was Lesley Anne Downey, 10 years old. They abducted her from a fairground. At the house of Brady and Hindley Lesley was photographed naked, tortured, raped and killed.

downFor a souvenir the couple tape-recorded Lesley’s torture. The tape lasted 16 minutes and 21 seconds.

In what may or may not have been their final victim, in October 1965 Brady and Hindley lured 17 year old Edward Evans to their home where Brady repeatedly hit him with an axe before strangling him with electrical chord. Hindley’s brother-in-law, David Smith, was recruited to help dispose of the body but Smith reported the incident to the police.

From then on the Brady-Hindley murders began to unravel. The tape of the Lesley Anne Downey torture and the photograph of Hindley at Kilbride’s grave surfaced.

It was the month after the arrest of Brady and Hindley that the death penalty was abolished in England.

After a two-week trial at Chester Assizes Brady and Hindley were found guilty of three murders: John Kilbride, Lesley Anne Downey and Edward Evans and sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. In the early 1980s Brady admitted to two more murders, those of Pauline Reade and Keith Bennett.

The sentencing judge considered Brady “wicked beyond belief” but considered Hindley could be reformed once she was removed from Brady’s influence. The possibility of a reformed Myra Hindley caught the attention of some serious people such as David Astor, editor of the liberal Sunday newspaper The Observer, Lord Longford and the Reverend Peter Timms, a Methodist minister who had once been a prison governor who came to believe that Hindley had reformed and urged her release.

Was she really a woman misled by a ruthlessly wicked man or was she a full partner in a monstrous folie a deux?

Before meeting Hindley when both worked for a chemical company, Brady was a small-time criminal whose biggest ambition was to be a bank robber.  He had an interest in Nazi atrocities and the works of the Marquis de Sade. There is some evidence that he and Hindley were into sadomasochism. Yet thousands share these same tastes without becoming murderers.

In his book, Gates of Janus, Brady writes: “In childhood years I was not the stereotypical ‘loner’ so beloved by the popular  media. Friends formed around me eagerly in the school playground, listening to me talk, and I took it as natural. Apparently, I had a descriptive talent and contagious enthusiasm. All harmless, adventurous stuff, no devious intent. No sense of superiority.”

What finally pushed him across the line may have been Myra Hindley’s chameleon-lie ability to be whatever others wanted her to be, an ability that reinforced the beliefs of those whom she wanted to influence.

Hindley’s background was little different to those of any other working-class Manchester girl. Her ex-paratrooper father liked his drink and was a hard man who wanted his daughter to be hard. When she was hit by a boy as a youngster he told her to go back and beat up the boy, threatening to use his belt on her if she did not. She beat the boy and got her first taste of power but her real talents lay elsewhere.

They both worked at a local chemical company. Hindley became infatuated with Brady, the first man she’d met who had clean fingernails. At first he ignored her, probably deliberately, until finally inviting her out to see a movie – Judgment at Nuremburg (Some account suggest the movie was King of Kings).

The journey to the horror of the Moors had begun.

They largely isolated themselves from co-workers and others in their social circle. Hindley bought a gun for a planned bank robbery and Brady would read from accounts of Nazi atrocities as she cleaned it. They started to lose the essential contact with reality that mixing with others might have brought them.

ian3Hindley dyed her hair blonde and took to wearing makeup and clothes that made her appear more like the Aryan ideal woman of Nazi mythology. In that isolation, with Hindley mirroring and not countering him, Brady came to believe that he was no longer bound by the mores and norms of society.

In the 1960s, the idea that a young woman who might wish to have children one day should murder youngsters seemed only plausible if she had come under the influence of Brady. It was comforting to believe, that removed from his influence, she would be reformed. In due course she became a cause celebre among those who wanted desperately to show that no matter how terrible a crime the criminal was capable of being reformed and returned to society.

She became a devout Catholic, took up tapestry and badminton and took an Open University course in Humanities, middle class pursuits that made her a better fit to the mindset of the reformists who became convinced that she had reformed and should be released.

To prison authorities she became the ideal prisoner and was put in charge of the kitchens.

To a former nun who became a prison guard, Patricia Cairns, she became a lover, one whom Cairns would help escape and the two would run away to South America as missionaries. The scheme was uncovered when wax and soap copies of prison keys were discovered.

ian2Janie Jones, a fellow prisoner, saw another side of Hindley: “(She) could ‘be whatever people wanted her to be. Even then, I noticed two sides to her. One was temperamental: she’d throw a tantrum, shout and perform, and they’d just lock her in her cell where she’d sit and sulk. The other side was very gentle and kind, and this is what made it so difficult to come to any conclusions about the woman’.

Dr. Tom Clark, who studied prison papers about Hindley released in 2008, says: “”You’re expecting something evil, almost as if you are touching evil, but what you find is someone who is very well caught up in the prison administrative system and is actually quite tedious… She uses the system to achieve all sorts of things, whether it’s being able to make her own cups of tea or asking the home secretary about her tariff date.”

Was she a victim of Brady’s force of personality? Dr Clark suggests not: “Hindley did not “do anything that she didn’t want to do. She is very resilient and very forthright in her own mind… I have no doubt that she knew what she was getting involved in.”

Hindley died in prison aged 60 in 2002 and was cremated.

Ian Brady, meanwhile, has been declared insane and is kept under high security at Ashworth Hospital. He wants to die and is on hunger strike. Currently he is being fed by tube and consistently appeals to be returned to prison and allowed to die, a luxury he has not been granted.

But for a quirk of timing he might have achieved that ambition at the end of an executioner’s rope nearly 40 years ago.

See Also:

Serial Child-Killer Ian Brady Argues For Death

More stories from Bob Couttie


The ‘Butcher Baker’ Is Dead at Last: Alaska’s Most Prolific Serial Killer Robert Hansen Dies after 30 Years in Prison

$
0
0

compiled by Patrick H. Moore

It’s no secret that serial killers often masquerade as everyday good citizens. To some degree, Alaska’s most prolific serial killer, ‘Butcher Baker’ Robert Hansen, did precisely that. Hansen, who confessed to murdering 17 women and raping 30, mostly in the Alaskan wilderness, died last Thursday at Alaska Regional Hospital after being in declining health for the past year. During his life as a free man, prior to his conviction in 1984, the Butcher Baker ran a bakery in Anchorage, Alaska and lived across town with his wife and children who had no idea that Dad was a deranged rapist/serial killer.

bak10Serial killers naturally vary considerably in their techniques and BB added an unusual and particular cruel wrinkle to his murder technique. Some of you who are ancient like me may have read a short story by Richard Connell first published in 1924 in Collier’s called “The Most Dangerous Game”. It’s the scintillating tale of a New York big-game hunter Rainsford who falls off a yacht and swims to an obscure island in the Caribbean where he is hunted in the jungle by a jaded Cossack aristocrat. Naturally, since it’s an adventure tale, Rainsford ultimately turns the tables on the Cossack, feeds him to his own dogs, and sleeps comfortably in his bed.

The Butcher Baker may have read Connell’s gripping tale; if not, he came up with a similar scenario on his own. His victims of choice were strippers and prostitutes who were plentiful in Boomstate Alaska during the 1970s and 1980s.

Rachel D’Oro writes:

Construction of the 800-mile trans-Alaska oil pipeline in the 1970s brought prostitutes, pimps, con artists and drug dealers to Alaska’s largest city, all aiming to separate construction workers from some of the big money they were pulling in. Many who looked for quick riches left as abruptly as they arrived in Anchorage, making sudden disappearances commonplace.

bak6According to retired trooper Glenn Flothe, who helped put Hansen behind bars, Hansen initially targeted any woman who caught his eye, but soon learned that due to their transient lifestyle, strippers and prostitutes were harder to track and less likely to be missed.

After selecting a victim, Hansen would abduct them and take them to remote places outside Anchorage. He was clever and would vary his modus operandi. Sometimes he would drive his victims to their doom, and other times he would fly them out into the middle of nowhere in his private plane. Sometimes being a licensed pilot comes in handy. Furthermore, he wouldn’t always kill the women he raped but would sometimes return them to Anchorage, warning them not to contact the authorities. “The Most Dangerous Game” connections stems from the fact that on other occasions, he would transport the women out into the wilderness, set them free, and then hunt them down with his rifle.

The Butcher Baker’s reign of terror began to show chinks in 1983 when he met 17-year-old Cindy Paulson. Hansen had offered Cindy $200 for oral sex, but when she got into the car, he pulled a gun on her and drove her to his house where he tortured and raped her. His exertions apparently wore him out; he chained her by the neck to a post in the basement and took a nap

bak11When he woke up, he put her in his car and drove her to the Merrill Field airport where he kept his Piper Super Cub. He told her his plan was to “take her out to his cabin” in the Knik River area of the Matanuska Valley, which was accessible only by boat or bush plane). While Hansen was busy loading the cockpit, Paulson made a run for it and escaped. Had she not gotten away, it’s very likely she would have been one of Hansen’s hunting victims.

She reported her nightmare to the police who questioned Hansen who of course denied the accusations and claimed Paulson was just mad because he wouldn’t kowtow to her extortion demands.

Amazingly, although Hansen had had several prior run-ins with the law, his meek demeanour and humble occupation as a baker, combined with a strong alibi from his friend John Henning, kept him from being considered as a serious suspect, and the case went cold.

bak8Dead bodies had begun turning up, however, with some evidence they had been killed by a hunter. Detective Frothe consulted with FBI agent Roy Hazelwood, and a criminal psychological profile was developed. Hazelwood believed that the killer would be an experienced hunter with low self-esteem, and would therefore, as is often the case, feel compelled to keep “souvenirs” of the murders, such as jewelry. With the help of the profile, Flothe investigated possible suspects and ultimately came to Hansen, who fit the profile and owned a plane. The remains of 23-year-old Sherry Morrow had been discovered in a shallow grave near the Knik River, which of course was accessible only by plane.

The screws were tightening and Flothe and the APD obtained a warrant to search Hansen’s plane, cars, and home. On 27 October, 1983, the investigators struck gold. They found jewelry associated with some of the missing women hidden in the corner of Hansen’s attic and an aviation map with little x marks on it secreted behind Hansen’s headboard.

bak5After that, it was only a matter of time, and Hansen finally confessed to more than a decade of attacks beginning as early as 1971. His earliest victims were teenagers, not the prostitutes and strippers who led to his discovery.

Hansen was serving a 461-year sentence at the time of his death which means he would have had to live to be as old as Methuselah to complete his sentence. Still, 30 years is a pretty decent stretch.

bak9The Associated Press attempted to interview Hansen 22 years after his conviction in 2006, but he rejected their request, writing in a unsigned note.

“I do not care so much for myself, but you journalist (sic) have hurt my family so very much.”

Hansen was the subject of a 2013 film titled, “The Frozen Ground,” which starred Nicolas Cage as an Alaska State Trooper investigating the slayings. John Cusack played Hansen.

* * * * *

bak4Hansen’s childhood provides at least some insight into the origins of his bloodthirsty ways. Although he was eventually to marry twice and have two children, he was a loner as a child and had a terrible relationship with his domineering father. To make matters worse, he stuttered and had bad acne, which led to bullying at school. Hunting was his escape and he served a year in the United States Army Reserve, and later worked as an assistant drill instructor at a police academy in Pocahontas, Iowa.

When he was 21, he was arrested for burning down a Pocahontas County Board of Education school bus garage, which led to him serving 20 months of a three-year prison sentence. His first wife, whom he had married shortly before burning down the garage, filed for divorce while he was incarcerated. After he got out, he was jailed several more times for petty theft. Thinking a change would do him good, in 1967, Hansen moved to Anchorage, Alaska, with his second wife, whom he had married shortly after his release from state prison.

bak3The amazing thing is the fact that in Anchorage, Hanson was well liked by his neighbors. His great prowess was as hunter and he set several local hunting records, quite a feat in big-game Alaska.

Ten years after moving to the north country, he went to jail for stealing a chainsaw. Later, he was diagnosed with bipolar disorder, and prescribed lithium which he may or may not have taken.

Without peeling back very many layers of the Serial Killer Onion, we see that the Butcher Baker had at least four qualities often associated with serial killers, and if we knew more about his childhood, we might discover more. He was 1) a loner; 2) had a dysfunctional relationship with his father; 3) loved killing animals (his specialty); and liked setting things on fire.

He was rather a late-bloomer, however, and apparently didn’t murder his first victim until 1971 when he was 32 years old.

The Death of All Things Crime Blog

$
0
0

by Patrick H. Moore

All good things must end (and all bad things too). What is ending now is All Things Crime Blog. We’ve been hit with a frivolous lawsuit which Patrick H. is fighting, with the help of a highly competent young lawyer (and a generous amount of realm coin).

Unfortunately, Moore is not in a position to shell out coin every time some allegedly aggrieved soul decides he or she has been defamed. Thus, my difficult decision to remove virtually all content from ATCB. The sidebar remains including our list of favorites and our crime novels which are for sale.

attI want to thank everyone who has contributed to ATCB during its better days. For quite a while, if Google is to be believed, it was one of the top two or three crime blogs in the nation. This could not have happened without the help of our courageous (and oftentimes brilliant) contributors and all of you out there in crime land, all of our followers who made coming to the blog part of their daily itinerary. I thank each and everyone of you.

att2It was with a heavy heart that I resolutely deleted nearly 2,000 posts, 20 at a time, but I feel it had to be done.

What I found especially rewarding during the 2 years ATCB was in existence was getting to know America (and to some degree the world) in a way I never had before. I will not forget this. I also enjoyed greatly interacting with our suburb contributors.

att3What I did not enjoy was getting up close and personal with the death penalty proponents and the bloodthirsty true crime followers on Facebook or the people that can find no better way to deal with criminals than to turn the miscreants (particularly the sex offenders) over to Bubba in the state penitentiary to be raped. The fact that many true crime followers take pleasure in such fantasies is very disconcerting but it is a fact. We live in a dark and bloody land full of violent fantasists who take pleasure in the thought of someone else’s misfortunes.

Although the lawsuit hastened the demise of ATCB, it would have happened anyway in the very near future as it’s time for Patrick H. to shake off the darkness that he has lived and breathed for the past two years (if he can) and try to let the light back into his life.

I will close with a phrase from the immortal Woody Guthrie:

“So long it’s been good to know you.”

 

Tough Scotswomen Reportedly Kick ____ at Premier of “50 Shades of Grey”

$
0
0

commentary by Patrick H. Moore

We Americans like to think we’re tough, and I suppose by some standards we are, but for sheer fist-fighting prowess, we’ll probably never catch up with our friends in the British Isles.

This important truth of life was brought home in spades the other night in Glasgow, a fist-fighting town in a fist-fighting section of Scotland. However, the incident in question may not have been a fist fight. It may have somebody getting “glassed” (cut up with a broken bottle), or it may have been some other form of violence. What is relatively certain is that a group of plastered Scots birds hit the roof and kicked butt when an irate male asked them to pipe down during the premier of that incredibly popular flick, 50 Shades of Grey, at the Grosvenor Cinema on Ashton Lane in Glasgow’s west end on Saturday night.

ash5(I don’t know much about 50 Shades of Grey other than that it’s raunchy, deals with S & M, and both the book and the film are immensely popular. Everybody and their brother and sister and even their maiden aunt and hermit uncle are reading it, watching it or both.)

Reports naturally vary with respect to what exactly happened at the Cinema on Saturday night, but the general outline is more or less like this. Apparently, the Scots whiskey was flowing freely and apparently tough Scots birds were belting it down with womanly gusto, rendering many of them drunk as lords (duchesses).

ash4A foolish fellow asked them to quiet down. This was a mistake. He was assaulted (the specifics of the assault are unclear) and the police were called to restore order.

Some theater patrons claimed the victim was “glassed” and that the staff had to wipe the blood off the seats before the next showing, but these reports have not been verified.

Agency at The Telegraph reports:

A spokesman for Police Scotland said: “At approximately 8pm on Saturday 14 February police responded to reports of a disturbance at the Grosvenor cinema.

“Three women have been arrested for alleged disorder offences and inquiries continue to determine the full circumstances surrounding the incident.”

ash2A young man from Glasgow reportedly had gone “to see the raunchy flick with his wife”. Before he even got inside the theater, he reports seeing three women in the process of being arrested.

I’m not entirely sure I trust this gentleman’s opinion, however, based on his churlish critique of the film itself which he described as “the worst film I have ever seen.” Realistically, it may not be a masterpiece of enduring cinematic art, but on the other hand, it probably has certain redeeming features – appealing body parts if nothing else. But, perhaps, I am a dreamer.

Actually, it sounds like a pretty cool scene. Folks in Glasgow appear to really know how to let their hair down. For one thing, instead of just diet Coke and sickeningly sweet, over-priced soft drinks, liquor is apparently sold right there in the cinema.

ash4And management is apparently proud of the fact that this was the only questionable incident of the weekend during which this fine film was shown to “nearly 2000 customers.” A commendable record, I would say.

I guess the only real issue is whether or not the victim “was glassed”, which seemingly makes all the difference.

*     *     *     *     *

And with that, I will recount the time I narrowly escaped being punched out (if not “glassed”) by four large, irate California women. Here’s what happened:

It was 41 years ago, 1975 to be exact. I was with my lovely first wife gleefully eating heart attack food in a suburban coffee shop. The place was jam-packed. I was wearing a blue jacket of no great importance which I foolishly took off and placed on a seat to my right.

ash7At some point, four large, muscular California women came in and sat to our right. Either we were all seated in one large booth or our table adjoined theirs, but somehow there was little separation between their thick, brawny haunches and ours.

I knew it was a bad scene and I carefully attended to forking the thousands of calories into my mouth. My lovely first wife did the same. We were worried and for good reason. These women were not only large and broad; they had  ‘tude galore and were sending mean looks our way. They looked like they ate glass for breakfast, but only after first carving you up with it. So I was as circumspect as possible…

The food was so delicious that my sweetheart and I eventually forgot about the ladies and proceeded to babble happily while shoveling it in. But all good things come to an end and soon it was time to depart. We paid the bill and left a tip.

ash9As we stood up, the horrible truth dawned on me. There was my blue jacket disappearing under the great haunch of the woman sitting immediately to my right. Only a single sleeve was visible. The rest of it was invisible. I knew her imprint and perhaps her pleasing scent would flirt forever with the fabric of my blue jacket.

I cleared my throat, girded my loins and spoke up:

“Excuse me, but I think that’s my jacket you’re sitting on.”

ash13She ignored me and shoved an entire turkey drumstick into her mouth. I envied her healthy appetite.

I repeated myself. My foe apparently had the marvelous ability to down entire turkey drumsticks without chewing. She looked at me, her eyes contemplating mayhem. It was clear that I was in a state of clear and present danger and that my lovely first wife was also in grave jeopardy.

Finally, she spoke. “F___ off, you little twerp.” She glanced to her right, her eyes locking with those of her even more Godzilla-like friend who nodded grimly.

(And just so I make myself clear, these women were in no way corpulent. They were Amazons, specimens such as I’d never seen before and have never seen since. They were athletes, weight-lifters, Olympians. Arnold S. in his prime had nothing on them.)

ash16Suddenly, a little lightbulb went on in my pea-brain. I turned to my wife and whispered for her to run. She did. She had barely cleared our table when I sprang into action, with all the speed and power of the great Quixote in his prime. With cat-like agility, I grabbed the sleeve of my blue jacket and yanked. It didn’t moved. I yanked again. I heard the agonized rasp of cloth tearing violently. I heard my wife screaming for me to run. To my horror, my sleeve appeared in my hand, truncated from the beleaguered body of my blue jacket.

At that moment, my opponent rose to her feet: 6’4”, 275 pounds, of steely, adamantine muscle. I hit her once right in the chops, a sterling uppercut that would have KOed a normal person. Instead my hand bounced off her face like a child bouncing on a trampoline. My knuckles are still sore 41 years later. I ran. There was no pursuit. Apparently, I was not of sufficient importance to be obliterated. Perhaps my stern opponent kept the remains of my jacket for a keepsake. Perhaps she used it for a snot-rag.

* * * * *

It is now 2015. I have been married to Lovely Wife #3 for 21 years. I am old and I still shiver when I recall the incident with the four Amazons. Still, I wish I had been in the Grosvenor Cinema on Ashton Lane in Glasgow on Saturday night. Just because I am not as tough as rugged, drunken Scotswomen does not mean that I can’t hold my own (or at least keep my mouth shut).

 

 

The Kidnapping of Mollie Digby: Was the Fair-Haired Stranger Actually Mollie?

$
0
0

by Darcia Helle

In 1870, New Orleans was a city divided by politics, class, and race. The Civil War had left much of the south reeling, and now the government’s Radical Reconstruction attempted to force change by integrating the black population into the white-dominated hierarchy. Some whites rebelled, clinging to their Confederate roots, while others who supported the change suffered ridicule and disdain within their community. The atmosphere was tumultuous. Racism was not only openly practiced but encouraged.

Former United States Supreme Court Justice John Campbell, who resigned in order to join the Confederacy, illustrates this point well. He had this to say to his fellow New Orleanians: “We have Africans in place all about us, they are jurors, post office clerks, custom house officers & day by day they barter away their obligations and duties.”

kid3Racial strife was not the only or even necessarily the biggest cause of violence. New Orleans’ wealthy class had a hair-trigger temper when it came to real or perceived slights. Duels to the death continued to be a favorite way of settling these disputes, earning the city of New Orleans the title of ‘Dueling Capital of the South’. The reason for this ran to the core of their values. Class and reputation were vital to the people of New Orleans. They believed the way a person dressed, spoke, and carried him/herself to be a statement of character. A person’s reputation was unquestioned, upheld by the community, and so the residents held a zero tolerance policy toward slander.

By 1870, this self-appointed elite class had become the minority. Foreign born immigrants made up 75% of the city’s population. Prejudices went much deeper than skin color. Irish and German immigrants were considered lowlifes, their presence tolerated by the upper class only slightly more than the presence of African-Americans. This hostile environment made New Orleans one of the most dangerous places in America during the late 1800s.

Thomas and Bridgette Digby were two of the city’s Irish immigrants living in relative obscurity. They had fled their country during the mid-1800s, along with thousands of others known as the “Famine Irish”. By June of 1870, the couple had three children and were living in a working class section of New Orleans. Thomas drove a hackney cab, and Bridgette took in laundry and sewing from the wealthy residents. Nothing about them or their lives was remarkable at the time. Certainly nothing suggested that their names would be committed to history.

mikeThat all changed on the afternoon of Thursday, June 9. At the end of each workday, the Digby’s street bustled with activity as people made their way home from their various jobs. On this day, two of the Digby children were in their front yard playing while Bridgette cooked dinner. George Digby, age 10, was playing with a group of friends. Seventeen-month-old Mollie was being watched by Rosa Gorman, a white teenage neighbor who sometimes babysat for Bridgette. Rosa was standing by the sidewalk, holding Mollie in her arms and occasionally conversing with the passersby.

Two African-American women who’d been walking by stopped to chat with Rosa. This was not unusual, despite the racial tension within the city. Irish and German immigrants shared that part of the city with free northern blacks and former slaves. They frequently conversed and even did business with one another. The two women were familiar to Rosa. She’d spoken to them before, though she did not know their names.

kid6As they stood talking, Rosa noticed smoke and flames coming from a storefront two blocks away. Soon the fire engine, pulled by a horse, raced by with its bell clanging. An excited crowd followed to watch Seligman’s Photographic Studio burn. Rosa wanted to join the procession to watch the firefighters at work. She called to George Digby to take his sister. While George grumbled, the taller “mulatto” woman extended her arms and offered to take Mollie so that Rosa could go. Rosa happily handed Mollie off, leaving the two children in the care of the two African-American women on the sidewalk.

In today’s society, this would seem an insane thing to do. We don’t leave our children with strangers, regardless of race or color. But communities were different in the late 1800s. Relying on one’s neighbors was not unusual. The main factor here was probably that these two African-American women were well-dressed, well-spoken, and familiar. In the city of New Orleans, where people based their opinions on appearance, this meant the two women were trustworthy.

This one incident on that June afternoon taught an entire community that looks are deceiving.

kid5After Rosa raced off behind the horse-drawn fire engine, the shorter of the two women called to George, Mollie’s brother, and asked if he knew where a particular seamstress lived. He said he did, and so the woman took him by the hand and asked if he would take them there. The two African-American women, one holding Mollie in her arms and the other holding George by the hand, made their way through the crowded streets.

According to George’s later account, he soon pointed out the home of Mary Cooks, the seamstress in question. The shorter woman told George he was mistaken, that it wasn’t the home they were looking for. And so they walked on.

New Orleans in 1870 was racially divided, but it wasn’t unusual to see black women with white children. African-Americans and black Creoles often worked as nannies for white families. No one paid the four of them any attention as they joined the crowds on the busy streets.

Eventually they reached a public market. The woman holding Mollie, described as tall and wearing a “seaside hat”, handed George some money, directed him to a booth to buy some bananas for his sister, and said they would wait for him. When George returned, the women – and Mollie – were gone.

kid4The events following Mollie Digby’s kidnapping created chaos within New Orleans. The city was in the midst of Radical Reconstruction, already bitterly divided by racial issues, and now two black women had stolen a white child. The rumors didn’t take long to start circulating. People claimed Mollie had been taken for voodoo sacrifice. Others said she’d been sold to roaming Gypsies. Then there were those who speculated that she’d been abducted as revenge against Thomas Digby for some perceived slight, or that she was being used to extort money from a former lover by claiming the child to be his.

kid7As rumors swirled and people pointed accusing fingers, the newly integrated police force struggled to gain traction in the case. In June of 1870, 28% of the New Orleans police force was African-American. While the majority, and all ruling officers, were white, this did nothing to ease the minds of conservative – bigoted – white New Orleans citizens. They wanted someone to blame for the police department’s failure to find Mollie and her kidnappers. White Police Chief Algernon Sidney Badger, along with Jean Baptiste Jourdain, the detective in charge of the case, became easy targets.

At a time when newspapers had limited circulation, before TV news gave us images of tragedies across the country, and long before the Internet put this all at our fingertips, the Digby case made national news. The missing child, however, was not the driving factor. Sadly, kidnappings and missing children were fairly common occurrences back then. The interest here stemmed partly from the circumstances, with well-dressed, well-mannered African-American women stealing a white child. But, more than that, the nation paid attention because this was the first case ever to be handled by a black police detective.

kidThe details of this case are too complicated and convoluted to share here. For a full account of this story, as well as fascinating details of the historical period, I highly recommend reading The Great New Orleans Kidnapping Case: Rage, Law, and Justice in the Reconstruction Era by Michael A. Ross. The short version of this story is that the outraged and outspoken media and citizens pushed the police department toward an arrest. In fact, they demanded nothing less. The following is a typical newspaper quote during the weeks after Mollie’s abduction:

“We may say to the police of New Orleans, that unless this child be found, they will suffer a burning disgrace – a lasting shame.” ~ The Picayune

kid2Nonexistent witnesses were conjured up, people embellished or outright lied, and police interrogated and threatened anyone thought to be even remotely involved. The intense emotions surrounding the case fractured the relationship between white and black Creoles. Before this, black Creoles and African-Americans existed on different planes, with black Creoles enjoying a higher status within their community. They were longtime residents, businesspeople, respected by the white-dominated population. With Mollie’s disappearance and the ensuing investigation, they found themselves scrutinized in ways they hadn’t experienced. Prejudice stung them as black Creole women became the lead suspects. The racial divide carried them along, lumping them in with the now freed slaves who couldn’t be trusted.

Eventually two black sisters – Ellen Follin and Louisa Murray – were arrested, after having been identified by three white ‘witnesses’. The preliminary hearing and criminal trial became the most talked about events in the city, as well as entertainment for the nation. The media was not so much concerned with facts of the crime, since the white-dominated papers, at least initially, assumed the women to be guilty unless proven innocent. The details the newspapers chose to share say much about the era and the mentality of southern society:

kid9A reporter from the Picayune noted that Louisa Murray wore “a dress of brown checked summer silk and a very light brown and fleecy veil.” She was “a handsome quadroon” with “small features, thin drawn up lips”, and “a wealth of glossy hair”.

Another reporter noted that the two sisters were much alike. “Both are tall beyond the average women, and slenderly formed. They are… mulatresses, but are by no means deficient in good looks. They dress with exceeding care and evince in their appeal a great deal of taste.”

Perhaps the most astonishing part of this entire case, given the time period, the outright persecution of someone black to blame, and the lackluster defense, is that the two sisters were found innocent by a jury of ten whites and two Afro-Creoles. Not only were they found innocent, but the jury took a mere eight minutes to deliberate. Again, the newspapers played a large role here, though not in the way one might expect. As the investigative details became public, reporters latched on to the glaring improprieties made by police

The Commercial Bulletin wrote that it was “next to impossible that an inquest [could] be conducted with less regard to the rules of evidence, the suggestion of common sense, the proprieties of judicial proceedings, or the law indicating the duty of a committing magistrate.”

kid10While the tumultuous times certainly contributed to Louisa Murray and Ellen Follin’s arrest, these same times also helped, on some subconscious level, to aid their defense. The sisters were well-known, well-respected, and well-educated Afro-Creole women. Had they been poorly educated African-American women, the trial’s outcome would likely have been far different. Also, Mollie Digby’s abduction came at a unique historical period. In 1870, New Orleans was a somewhat enlightened southern city. Just a few years earlier would have placed them in the midst of the Civil War, when Confederates demanded control and wanted to subjugate all people of color. Just a few short years later, this area of the south was taken over by White Supremists, ensuring no person of color held any position of power or authority. But during this seven month period, from June 1870 to February 1871, a racially divided city managed to look beyond color to see the core of injustice.

kid8An especially intriguing aspect of this case is that, before the trial or even the arrests, Mollie Digby was found and returned home. Or so the story goes. A fair-haired child of the same age was certainly handed off to the Digbys, though we will likely never know for sure whether that child was indeed Mollie. When the child was first given to Thomas Digby, her father, a mere couple of months after her disappearance, he could not say for sure whether the child was Mollie. In fact, he initially denied she was Mollie and didn’t want to take her. With some cajoling from those who found her, he opted to take her back home to let his wife decide. Bridgette Digby saw her husband return home with the child in his arms, and she immediately declared that child to be Mollie. Most took her at her word, believing Bridgette Digby to know her own child. Others had doubts rooted in the fact that Bridgette had been institutionalized because of her inability to cope with the loss of her daughter. She’d only recently been released and, perhaps, was so desperate to have her child back that she deluded herself into believing the fair-haired stranger was hers. There appears to be no record of Mollie’s reaction to being reunited with her parents or, possibly, the two people who claimed her as their own.

 

Please click to below to view Darcia’s Helle’s many excellent posts:

Edward Elmore Rode the Legal Railroad to 30 Years on Death Row: His Crime? Simple! He Was Black and Poor

 “The Wrong Carlos”: Non-Violent Manchild Executed for Murder He Did Not Commit

The Electric Chair Nightmare: An Infamous and Agonizing History

Autopsies: Truth, Fiction and Maura Isles and Her 5-Inch-Heels

Don’t Crucify Me, Dude! Just Shoot Me Instead! Spartacus and Death by Crucifixion

To Burn or Not to Burn? Auto-Da-Fé Is Not Good for Women or Children!

The Disgraceful Entrapment of Jesse Snodgrass: Keep the Narcs Out of Our Schools

Why Should I Believe You? The History of the Polygraph

“Don’t Behead Me, Dude!”: The Story of Beheading and the Invention of the Guillotine

Aileen Wuornos, America’s First High-Profile Female Serial Killer, Never Had a Chance

The Terror of ISO: A Descent into Madness

Al Capone Could Not Bribe the Rock: Alcatraz, Fortress of Doom

Cyberspace, Darknet, Murder-for-Hire and the Invisible Black Machine

darcDarcia Helle lives in a fictional world with a husband who is sometimes real. Their house is ruled by spoiled dogs and cats and the occasional dust bunny.

Suspense, random blood splatter and mismatched socks consume Darcia’s days. She writes because the characters trespassing through her mind leave her no alternative. Only then are the voices free to haunt someone else’s mind.

Join Darcia in her fictional world: www.QuietFuryBooks.com

The characters await you.

The Notorious Pamela Smart Murder Case: Do Cameras Affect Justice in the Courtroom?

$
0
0

by Heather Piedmont

Using the first fully televised court case as its subject, a recent documentary, Captivated: The Trials of Pamela Smart, directed by Jeremiah Zagar, examines the question of whether (and if so, how) the televising of courtroom trials have affected the possibility of justice being rendered. In re-examining the case and its key events, the documentary explores the question through interviews with Pamela Smart as well as with experts in the legal field and individuals who were involved in the case.

 

The Case

pam4On May 1, 1990 Gregory Smart was found dead in front of his Derry, New Hampshire condominium. Four teenage boys, William “Billy” Flynn, Pete Randall, Vance Lattime, Jr., who drove the getaway car, and Ray Fowler, were soon found to be the alleged plotters/killers of Pamela Smart’s young husband.

It was discovered that Billy Flynn, who was 15 at the time, and Pamela, who was Director of the Media Center at the teen’s high school, were having an affair and Pamela was soon convicted of being an accomplice to first-degree murder; conspiracy to commit murder; and witness tampering.

Billy Flynn was convicted of second-degree murder, and his three friends were convicted as accomplices. The court records state that Flynn shot Gregg Smart once in the head as Pete Randall held a knife to his throat. Vince Lattime and Ray Fowler waited in the car.

pam2As of July of this year, all four young men are either free or are in the process of gaining their freedom, as a result of them receiving lesser sentences for agreeing to testify against Pamela. William Flynn was recently moved to a minimum security prison in Maine as part of a work release program. Patrick Randall is now a minimum security inmate at a transitional work center. Vance Lattime Jr. was released on parole in 2005, and Raymond Fowler, who may have have done little other than wait in the car alongside Lattime, received parole in 2003.

Pamela Smart, however, based on her counts of conviction, is serving mandatory LWOP. Although her harsh sentence may have been inevitable, there is a real question as to whether the manner in which she was portrayed by the media hopelessly prejudiced the jury against her.

 

Character Assassination or Accurate Portrayal?

pam13Smart’s trial was widely watched and was likened to a “media circus.” In addition to Jeremiah Zagar’s recent documentary, the trial spawned a television movie starring Helen Hunt and Chad Allen and inspired the Joyce Maynard novel To Die For, which was adapted into a 1995 film starring Nicole Kidman. The case was also the subject of several best-selling true crime books, including Teach Me To Kill and Deadly Lessons.

As the documentary takes pains to point out, the image that probably best captures the media’s attempt to portray Ms. Smart as a brazen, fallen and conniving woman are the infamous bikini shots that she allegedly used to sexually arouse her teen lover. In reality, however, these photos were actually taken with her best girlfriend to apply to a fashion contest literally years before she started working at the Media Center.

Jeremiah Zagar includes a telling scene that demonstrates that even today as she wearily serves her life sentence, Pamela is still scared to reveal who and what she was at the time of her husband’s murder because she still fears how the media will portray her.

The documentary also discusses how her alleged lack of emotion, once caught on camera, allowed any and all negative labels to be foisted upon her such as the now infamous “Kill for Love” phrase that was plastered all over her case even before the trial began.

SMARTIt is noted that while in prison in prison, Smart has spent her time tutoring other inmates and has completed two master’s degrees in literature and legal studies, which were paid for with private funds from Mercy College. While incarcerated, Smart became a member of the National Organization for Women, campaigning for rights for women in prison.

Despite her academic success while in custody, Ms. Smart’s time in prison has been no bed of roses:

In October 1996, Smart was severely beaten by two inmates M. Graves and G. Miller, who accused her of snitching about their prison relationship. The attack resulted in a metal plate being placed in the left side of her face.

pam6In 2003, photos of a scantily clad Smart were published in the National Enquirer; after filing a complaint, she was placed in solitary confinement for two months. Smart filed a lawsuit, claiming the photos were taken by a prison guard who had raped her. The lawsuit was dismissed but the following year, Smart and another inmate sued officials of Bedford Hills Correctional Facility for Women, claiming both sexual harassment and sexual assault by a corrections officer, who they said coerced them into posing for the suggestive pictures that were published in 2003. Five years later, Smart received a $23,875 settlement from the state of New York.

 

 

Everybody Wants to be a Star

aii3-150x150It is human nature that, given the right circumstances, many of us want to be stars and grip tightly onto any opportunity to gain our “time in the sun”. During the trial of serial killer Aileen Wuornos, it was alleged that law enforcement personnel not only worked to gain financially from the story of the murders and eventual capture of the killer, but even conspired with her lover, Tyria Moore, while she was a witness for the prosecution. This unfortunate tendency is demonstrated in Zagar’s documentary, which reveals that the arresting officer wanted to re-write his first words to Pamela at the time of her arrest, or at least his first words as presented to the first reporter on the story, William Spencer.

In fact, what Spencer “thought” about what had happened to Gregory Smart, according to appellate attorney J. Albert Johnson, were set in media-stone by the made-for-television movie, Anatomy of a Murder, which was released to the public two days before the jury was selected.

There was even a mini-accusation of the police giving Ms. Smart a longer than usual perp walk “for the cameras”.

 

Brief Reflections on the Banality of Pop Culture

pam11As the O.J. Simpson trial evolved, so did the hairstyles and wardrobe of prosecutor Marcia Clark; as the Casey Anthony case progressed, the Assistant State Attorney Jeff Ashton’s ties became national news when he wore a “Stay Dwight” necktie in the courtroom as a futile attempt to convince Dwight Howard to stay with the Orlando Magic.

“One of my sons had this made for me and asked me to wear it,” Ashton said as he touched the neckwear outside the Orange County Courthouse.

Tpam9he current emphasis on banal inessentials such as State Attorney Ashton’s neckties may have gotten its start, as Zagar points out in his documentary, with the emphasis on Pamela Smart’s hair bow stories. Although this is perhaps to be expected in the world of pop culture, it certainly seems to beg the question…was justice achieved at Pamela Smart’s trial and what in the world do her hair bows have to do with that pursuit of justice?

At Ms. Smart’s trial, even the testimony, in theory the lifeblood of the proceedings, was reflected in true pop culture fashion. One of the “important” facts discussed when Pamela’s lover Billy Flynn took the stand was that one on of their trips together, they went shopping for cars.

 

The Connections We Make

pam8The most engrossing and important issue the documentary really discusses is how we see what we see. Richard Sherwin of the New York Law School discussed it insightfully when he said that when we view cases like the Pamela Smart case, we see the “Black Widow” story that we know from movies and pop culture, which in turn almost blankets the reality of the situation.

“Ah Ha…I know the Black Widow story…I know the Ice Princess Story,” the legal expert stated. He then continued stating that once we identify the label it is “internalized” and cannot be removed from our perception of the case and that therefore we only reflect on details that support this biased and narrowed understanding of the case.

Even Joyce Maynard, who recounted the story in her now made-infamous-by-Hollywood text To Die For, stated that we all know the archetype that we are supposedly seeing in Pamela as well as a personal and heavily emotionalized archetype of the beautiful woman we love to hate, and love watching as she is destroyed both in the courtroom and through the media-fueled character assassination.

 

The Result: Was There Justice?

pam7With Gregory Smart’s two main killers of the verge of being released from prison and Pamela Smart being literally scared of her own shadow to this day, what was the effect of the media portrayal on her conviction which inextricably led to her sentence of LWOP? While there were many honest and, therefore, rejected jurors, appellate attorney J. Albert Johnson stated that the jurors may have had their “bell” rung once they learned about the case before even entering the courtroom. In fact, Ms. Smart’s defense requested a change of venue and sequestration, both of which were denied. In the end, we have a woman imprisoned for life….and are left with the burning question: With all of this in the mix of the trial…could justice possibly be served?

And another equally important question: To this day, do we have any actual sense of who Pamela Smart really is? And, of course, we are left to wrestle with the larger question: If we can’t confidently conclude whether the first televised trial brought about justice…what about all the other televised “media circuses” that have followed in its wake?

 

unnamedHeather Piedmont, in addition to being a marketing coach is also a freelance crime writer and reporter. She has covered the Jodi Arias Trial and the Scott Peterson Trial, as well as the Casey Anthony Trial.

When Santa Cruz Was “The Murder Capital of the World,” Part One

$
0
0

by BJW Nashe

When I lived in Santa Cruz, California from 1982-87, I had no idea that this pleasant seaside town was once dubbed “The Murder Capital of the World.” By the time I moved there to attend UC Santa Cruz, where I majored in philosophy (with an unofficial minor in hallucinogens), there was little or no mention of murder. The mass killing had occurred a decade earlier. The only murders I recall were found in existentialist novels by Albert Camus and Fyodor Dostoevsky. I lived a block and half from the sea. We liked to stroll along West Cliff Drive late at night. Everything seemed perfect.

frazz11Only recently did I discover that Santa Cruz was once a murder capital — and I happened upon the information solely by chance. Last month, I was intrigued by a work of fiction by Grace Krilanovich called The Orange Eats Creeps – which I highly recommend, if you’re in the mood for a freestyle gothic tale of teenage-vampire-hobo-junkies misbehaving in the Pacific Northwest. While googling some interviews with the author, I learned that she grew up in Santa Cruz. In one interview, she pointed out that during the early 1970s — before she was even born — her hometown was plagued by an epidemic of serial killings. Sure enough, a quick online search yielded a whole trove of information on these crimes, and the deranged individuals who committed them. Praise the Lord for the bounteous Internet. When it comes to true crime and porn, the World Wide Web really delivers. And it’s fascinating to see how transgressive fiction sometimes bleeds right into true crime.

It may seem odd to realize that one’s college town — the source of so many fond personal memories — has a buried history that includes a bunch of shocking frazz6murders. But this shouldn’t seem odd at all, because that’s how it is here in America. Every town has its own buried past, or occult history, which includes an abundance of scandal and crime. Some towns might be considered virtual plague yards. In California, the occult history runs counter to the official version of the Golden State as a success story characterized by progress, wealth, fame, and innovation. The occult history forces us to confront the dark side of the story, which includes child abuse, misogyny, drugs, murder, madness, greed, and exploitation. We might prefer to forget the truly hideous stuff, and hope it all fades away, but it’s still there, waiting to resurface again and again, like some horrible repressed memory that won’t leave us alone until we deal with it effectively once and for all. Perhaps the true arc of human history, as Professor Norman O. Brown used to explain in his seminars at UC Santa Cruz, resembles nothing so much as a patient’s struggle to overcome a debilitating neurosis.

frazz13For a town such as Santa Cruz, neurosis is one thing. “Murder capital of the world” takes us to another level altogether. The exaggeration is understandable, however, when you get into the details. During the span of just a few years from 1971-73, three individuals were convicted of 23 separate murders in Santa Cruz County. Several other deaths and disappearances remain unsolved to this day. Given the population and demographics of the region, that’s quite a record. With the high-profile crimes of the Manson Family in Los Angeles and the Zodiac Killer in San Francisco still big news at the time, people in Santa Cruz were justifiably terrified when similar atrocities began to afflict their community.

The murders committed by John Linley Frazier, Big Ed Kemper, and Herbert Mullin in the Santa Cruz area never achieved the same level of national attention as the Tate-LaBianca slayings. Yet the Santa Cruz murders were just as shocking as those committed by the hippie death cult down south. Moreover, the Santa Cruz murders were just as relevant to the troubled zeitgeist of the early 1970s, which was marked by extreme civil unrest, rampant drug abuse, profound disillusionment, and the ongoing tragedy of a doomed war in Vietnam. Even more significant, perhaps, is the fact that all three of the Santa Cruz killers were men suffering from mental illness. One of them was preoccupied with targeting women. Clearly, mentally ill criminals and violence against women are problems that continue to wreak havoc in American society, even in sunny California.

We can think of the following three psychopaths as anti-celebrities starring in their own deranged counterpart to SoCal’s Hollywood Babylon. Think of them as “NorCal Gothic,” or “Breaking Bad in Santa Cruz.” Like it or not, their stories belong to us, are part of who we are, and we need to somehow understand them if we ever hope to move beyond the twisted psychology of murder.

 

John Linley Frazier — The Killer Prophet

frazz14The Santa Cruz murders began on October 19, 1970, when police discovered the bodies of five people at the affluent Soquel home of a well-respected local eye surgeon. Dr. Victor Ohta, his wife Virginia, their two preteen sons, and the doctor’s secretary all had been shot and left floating in the family swimming pool. The victims were blind-folded, and their hands were bound behind their backs with colorful silk scarves. The killer had left a rambling letter behind, which was evidently typed on Dr. Ohta’s typewriter:

“Halloween, 1970. Today World War III will begin, as brought to you by the People of the Free Universe. From this day forward, anyone and/or everyone or company of persons who misuses the natural environment or destroys same will suffer the penalty of death by the People of the Free Universe. I and my comrades from this day forth will fight until death or freedom against anyone who does not support natural life on this planet. Materialism must die, or Mankind will stop.”

The note was signed in a distinctive manner: “Knight of Wands, Knight of Cups, Knight of Pentacles, and Knight of Swords.”

Since several groups of hippies were living nearby, authorities quickly assumed that they were dealing with another Manson-style massacre. In questioning the local long-hairs, however,  cops received a tip that led them to focus on a single suspect — John Linley Frazier. The ensuing investigation painted a distressing picture of a young man driven to random murder by a disastrous combination of mental illness and drug use. The man who penned the “Knight of Wands” note became known as “The Killer Prophet.”

frazzFrazier was considered a “fairly normal guy” growing up in Santa Cruz. A high school drop-out, he worked as an auto mechanic in town, and lived with his wife, who called him a “beautiful person.” As a young man, however, Frazier seems to have developed symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia. When he began experimenting with drugs, this condition worsened. His marriage eventually fell apart, and he began espousing increasingly radical environmental views, seasoned with apocalyptic visions and mystical readings of the tarot cards. He quit his job at the auto shop, telling his boss he refused to “contribute to the death cycle of the planet.” Fiercely paranoid, plagued by voices, he didn’t fit in too well with the laid-back lifestyle of the local hippie communes. His intensity frightened the pot-smoking vegetarians seeking harmony together. Frazier tended to tune in, turn on, and freak out. When he took LSD, God told him to do bad things.

Soon isolated from the communes, he began living as a self-styled Aquarian Age hermit, residing in a six-foot-square shack in the woods, not far from Dr. Victor Ohta’s property. Frazier had a good look at Dr. Ohta’s place. Right away, he knew that the owners were “too materialistic.” Once, while the Ohta family was out, Frazier broke into their house to creep around. Before he left, he stole a pair of binoculars.

frazz2Not long after the binocular theft, on October 19, 1970, Frazier returned to the Ohta mansion. The doctor’s wife, Virginia, was the only person home. Brandishing a .38 revolver that he found inside, Frazier bound Virginia’s wrists with a scarf and waited for the rest of the family to come home. Soon, the doctor’s secretary, Dorothy Cadwallader, showed up, along with one of the Ohta boys. Then Dr. Ohta returned home with their second son. On arrival, each of them were tied up at gunpoint. Standing with his captives outside by the pool, Frazier lectured them on the evils of materialism and the ways in which it was destroying the environment. Dr. Ohta, no fan of hippies to begin with, started arguing with Frazier, who promptly shoved him into the pool. While the doctor thrashed around trying to get out of the water, Frazier shot him three times. One by one, Frazer then killed all four of the others — Virginia, Dorothy, then the boys, Derrick, and Taggart. Frazier went back inside the house, typed his “Knight of Wands” note, and set the house ablaze. When firefighters showed up they found the five bodies in the pool, and the typewritten note tucked under the windshield wipers of Dr. Ohta’s Rolls-Royce.

When the “Knight of Wands” murder note was published by the local press, several hippies recognized the bizarre discourse as possibly belonging to the man who had frightened them with his crazy talk — John Linley Frazier. They told the police where to find his shack in the woods. Police were also able to lift Frazier’s fingerprints from the Rolls-Royce and from a beer can found at the crime scene. Frazier was apprehended five days after the murders.

courtroom08_PH3The murder trial was a three-part spectacle. Frazier was first convicted in just two hours. A second trial was held to determine sanity, and then a third trial to determine his sentence. For the sanity trial, Frazier showed up in court with one side of his head completely shaved, and half of his mustache and beard shaved off. The jury was treated to lengthy testimony regarding acid trips and messages from God and ecological tirades. Some thought Frazier was putting on an act to win an insanity plea, but his psychologist thought otherwise. While Frazier never confessed his crimes to the police, he did tell his shrink all about it. He said he had broken into Dr. Ohta’s house when no one was home, spotted what looked like an animal-skin bedspread, and went berserk. “It blew my mind,” the defendant recalled. He never noticed that the animal-skin was fake.

In the end, Frazier was found to be sane, and he received the death sentence. He regarded the gas chamber as preferable to “having fascist pigs working on my head.” Frazier’s preference became irrelevant, however, when the California Supreme Court abolished capital punishment in 1972, and commuted his sentence to life imprisonment. Thirty-five years later, “The Killer Prophet” took matters into his own hands. In August of 2009, he committed suicide by hanging himself in his single occupant cell. He was 62 years old.

Stay tuned for Part Two of “When Santa Cruz Was the “Murder Capital of the World”

When Santa Cruz Was “The Murder Capital of the World,” Part Two

$
0
0

by BJW Nashe

In the early 1970s, the charming seaside town of Santa Cruz, California was plagued by a series of murders. The main culprits were a trio of serial killers who claimed the lives of at least 23 victims. In Part One of this three-part series, we delved into the deranged mind of mass murderer John Linley Frazier, “The Prophet Killer.” In Part Two, we explore the shocking exploits of Big Ed Kemper, “The Co-ed Killer.” Santa Cruz is cherished in the memories of those of us who have lived there. Like any other American town, however, Santa Cruz has it’s dark side. Big Ed Kemper is about as dark as it gets anywhere in the world of crime.

Big Ed Kemper — The Co-ed Killer

Edmund Kemper was a very bright kid, a near-genius, who unfortunately had to endure a wretched, abusive upbringing. This no doubt helped him to grow up and become a dangerous psychopath who hated women so much he ended up killing eight of them. The twisted Kemper saga is worth recounting in some detail.

ed9Edmund’s parents divorced when he was seven years old. He grew up largely estranged from his father. His mother, Clarnell Kemper, was an alcoholic with borderline personality disorder. A domineering controller with a mean streak, she apparently came from the Bates Motel school of parenting. She raised her son Edmund as if they were playing leading roles in a sequel to the film Psycho. Early on, her mistreatment of Edmund caused him to start acting strangely. This only made her increase the abuse. A vicious cycle was underway. She constantly belittled and humiliated him, blaming him for his father leaving her. She accused him of wanting to rape his sister. She often forced him to sleep in the locked basement of their home. The basement had a trapdoor with a padlock on the outside, so she could control his confinement. Not surprisingly, Edmund’s outlook became morbidly troubled. Preoccupied with fantasies of death and murder, he enjoyed abusing animals and playing with their rotting corpses, which he displayed as trophies in his bedroom closet. He enacted bizarre sexual rituals with his sister’s dolls.

By the time Edmund was a teenager, he was splitting time between his mother’s house in Aptos, CA and his grandparents’ place in North Fork. As a high school freshman, the boy already stood 6’ 4″ tall. One would hope that his grandparents’ home might have provided some welcome relief from “Mommie Dearest.” The problem was that Edmund’s grandmother was nearly as bad — a domineering, verbally abusive woman who only infuriated her already traumatized grandson.

ed5On the morning of August 27, 1965, Kemper snapped. In a fit of psychotic rage following an argument with his grandmother, Edmund shot and killed her as she sat at the kitchen table working on a children’s novel she was writing. Then, fascinated with what he had done, Kemper simply watched her die in a pool of her own blood, staring at her as the life drained out of her eyes. He was just 15 years old.

Realizing how furious his grandfather would be over what he had done, Edmund decided he had only one option: Grandpa also must die. When the elderly man pulled up in the driveway, returning home from the store with a bag of groceries in the back seat, the teenager charged from the house with a .22 caliber handgun and shot him before he had a chance to slam the car door shut. He died instantly.

Edmund called his mother to inform her of what he had done. “Hi, Mom. I just shot Grandma and Grandpa.” Clarnell, apparently not all that shocked by the news, convinced her son to call the police. Edmund ended up at the Atascadero State Mental Facility, where he served less than five years. During his stay at the facility, Kemper’s I.Q. tests showed a very high level of intelligence (scores of 135-145). Using his exceptional smarts, he evidently succeeded in manipulating some of the doctors and facility staff, playing the role of “model patient” in order to obtain their trust. Kemper even worked as an assistant at the hospital, which allowed him access to certain medical records and documentation. Some claim that he was able to memorize the answers to psychological tests to ensure that he received positive scores. Eventually, Kemper was able to convince physicians, attorneys, and various state officials that he was now stable enough as an adult to re-enter society. Kemper was released in 1969, relinquished back into his mother’s custody in Aptos, which is just south of Santa Cruz. Kemper’s juvenile record was sealed.

ed12Fully grown at 6’ 9” and weighing close to 300 pounds, Kemper, now known as “Big Ed,” found himself a free man. He held down a series of menial jobs, eventually gaining a permanent position with the state agency now known as CALTRANS. However, by the start of 1972, his mental state had deteriorated once again. A  psychotic breakdown was imminent. Big Ed wanted a girlfriend, but he had no success in this regard. He grew angry when his mother, who worked as an administrative assistant at UC Santa Cruz, failed to help him meet a female companion among the college students with whom she interacted. Then Mom had the nerve to question his manhood. The house in Aptos was clearly no better than a psychopathology lab. Big Ed’s hatred for his mother turned into hostility toward all women. Even Big Ed’s professional aspirations just led to more aggravation, since he had failed to realize his dream of becoming a police officer. Given what we know of him and his upbringing, it’s probably just as well that he never wore a badge. In any case, his CALTRANS job was not enough to overcome his psychological torments. By early 1972, Big Ed was headed for trouble. He embarked on a horrendous killing spree that included corpse mutilation and necrophilia.

In May of 1972, Big Ed picked up two hitchhiking college coeds, Mary Ann Pesce and Anita Luchessa, both 18 years old. After a tense one-hour journey, he drove them to a secluded area near Alameda, where he smothered and stabbed Pesce to death, before fatally stabbing Luchessa. Big Ed stashed both corpses in the trunk of his car and headed for home. In his room, he took  pornographic photographs of the naked corpses before dismembering them and placing the body parts into plastic bags, which he later abandoned near Loma Prieta Mountain. Kemper had oral sex with Pesce’s severed head before disposing of both girls’ heads in a ravine.

ed4In September of 1972, Big Ed picked up another hitchhiker, this time a 15-year-old named Aiko Koo, who was hoping to catch a ride to her dance class. He kept her captive in the car at gunpoint as he drove to a secluded spot, where he strangled her. He then brought her body back to his mother’s Aptos home, where he had sex with the corpse, dissected and decapitated the body, and buried her head in his mother’s garden. He buried the rest of her remains elsewhere on the property.

In January of 1973, Big Ed picked up 19-year-old Cindy Schall, a student of Cabrillo College in Aptos. He took her to a secluded area, shot her with a .22 caliber pistol, placed her body in the trunk of his car, and drove back to his mother’s house. There, he kept the body in his room overnight until he removed the bullet from her head and decapitated her. He later dissected her body in the bathtub and buried her severed head in his mother’s garden as a kind of sick joke, because, as he later put it, his mother “always wanted people to look up to her.” He discarded the rest of Schall’s remains in a nearby ravine.

ed2In February of 1973, after yet another argument with his mother, Kemper picked up Rosalind Thorpe and Allison Liu, ages 24 and 23, while he was driving around on the UC Santa Cruz campus. Once he had driven away from the university property, he shot them both in the head with his .22 and sped back to Aptos with the two lifeless bodies wrapped in blankets. Safely back at Mom’s house, Big Ed had sex with both of the corpses. There’s no place like home. The next morning, he dismembered and decapitated the bodies, then dumped their remains in San Francisco’s Eden Canyon, where they were found a week later.

Police now were feeling the pressure to apprehend the man known as the “Co-ed Killer.” Ironically, Big Ed liked to hang out at a bar in Santa Cruz called The Jury Room, which was a frequent hang-out for off-duty law enforcement personnel. Kemper was friendly with some of these officers. No doubt he sat and listened to these cops discuss the crimes that he, unbeknownst to them, had been committing.

ed14For some unknown reason, Big Ed decided he was done killing co-eds. He saved “Mommie Dearest” for last. On Good Friday of 1973, fed up with his mother’s endless taunting and complaining, he smashed her in the head with a claw hammer while she slept in her bed. He then cut off her head, used it for oral sex, and placed it on the mantel above the fireplace, so he could use her face as a dartboard. Big Ed also removed his mother’s vocal cords and placed them in the kitchen garbage disposal, which he felt was a suitable end to her “constant bitching.” Apparently, the garbage disposal struggled to break down the tough vocal cord tissue and ejected much of the mess back up into the sink. Big Ed later told authorities that this “seemed appropriate, as much as she’d bitched and screamed and yelled at me over so many years.”

Big Ed wasn’t quite finished yet. His mother’s best friend, 59 year-old Sally Hallert, had also earned a place on his hit list. He phoned Sally, inviting her to come over and dine with him and his mother. When Sally arrived, she was greeted with a violent punch in the gut, which knocked the wind out of her. Then Bid Ed strangled her to death. He promptly fled the scene of his gruesome final crimes, driving east in a hurry.

ed13Kemper drove on through Nevada and Utah, and into Colorado. After hearing news on the radio about his mother’s death, he stopped at a phone booth in Pueblo, Colorado to call the police. On the phone, he confessed to the murder of his mother and Hallert, but the police didn’t take him seriously at first, and told him to get back to them at a later time. Several hours later, Kemper called again and asked to speak to an officer he knew personally. At this time, he made no mention of his crimes as the “Co-ed Killer.” He just waited inside his car until the cops showed up to arrest him for killing his mother and her friend Sally.

Big Ed cooperated fully with the authorities, confessing to all of his crimes, and even escorting officers to the locations of his victims’ remains. At his trial, Big Ed pleaded “not guilty” by reason of insanity. The jury did not agree that he was legally insane, though. In November of 1973 they found Big Ed Kemper guilty of eight counts of murder. He reportedly asked for the death penalty, but since capital punishment was suspended at the time in California, he instead received life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.

ed7Authorities at the Correctional Medical Facility in Vacaville have described Kemper as a model prisoner who lives in the general prison population and works at several jobs within the prison. They claim that Big Ed tends to do well in a controlled environment and that he no longer brags about the murders as much as he used to, except during the occasional tours provided to graduating criminal justice students visiting the prison.

 

Stay tuned for Part Three of “When Santa Cruz Was The Murder Capital of the World”

Click below to view Part One of “When Santa Cruz Was The Murder Capital of the World”

When Santa Cruz Was “The Murder Capital of the World”


Two’s Company, Three’s a Deadly Crowd: The Cruel Killing of Martha Gail Fulton

$
0
0

by Starks Shrink

Donna Kay Tapani paid three misfits to murder Martha Gail Fulton, the wife of her former lover, George Fulton. That’s the simplest story; the motivations and complexities of this case run much deeper than what’s readily apparent on the surface.

Gail Garza was a devout Catholic girl who grew up in small town Texas. She met George and they dated but she still maintained her college aspirations and completed a degree in speech pathology. In the meantime, George went off to West Point and a career in the Army. He reunited with Gail and they soon married, anticipating a typical peripatetic military existence.

adon9Gail soon had three children, born at different duty stations, including locations in Germany and the US. She was a devoted and doting mother and wife, believing it to be her destiny as sanctioned by her faith. George, however, if rumors are to be believed, had a wandering eye that was followed by other body parts. One documented dalliance occurred when the couple was stationed in Panama which led Gail to return home abruptly to her home town in Texas. During this period, Gail reportedly became very depressed and lost so much weight that her family was concerned she was anorexic. Gail had severe self-esteem issues and her weight loss was always an indicator of unhappiness. Perhaps she thought that exercise and slimness (about which she was obsessive) would make her more attractive to her husband, or more likely, this was her obsessive reaction to the pain she couldn’t seem able to stop.

adon5George eventually retired from the Army and Gail assumed that they would lay down roots amongst her family in Texas, as they had always planned. That was not to be; George, flailing about to find a career after military service, decided unilaterally to move the family to Lake Orion, Michigan, a small community outside of Detroit. Reluctantly, Gail, as always, gave in to her husband’s wishes.

adon2Gail settled into life in that community with her husband and two of her three children. The move was so abrupt that her oldest child opted to remain in Texas with Gail’s mother while she pursued a college degree. Gail’s two younger children — Emily and Andrew, still in high school, made the big trek to Michigan with their parents. It’s fairly clear from Gail’s friends and family back in Texas, and her children, that she was not very happy during that time. Gail always seemed to lose weight and become anxious and stressed when her life presented difficulties, and during this interval she was rail thin and looked old beyond her years. Mostly she dealt with adversity through talking with her priest, praying and doing her nightly rosary beads, convinced that God would see her through the difficult times. Sadly, her life in Michigan would have more challenges than joys and Gail wasn’t always up to the task.

Screen Shot 2014-08-07 at 4.05.14 PMThe job that precipitated George moving his family to Michigan dissolved in a matter of months, and once again, he began seeking the brass ring. He thought he found it in an opportunity in Florida, working with a company called Concerned Care Home Health (CCHH). In truth, however, it was the beginning of disaster. While in Florida on business, George had a chance encounter with a vivacious, outspoken woman, quite the opposite of his wife Gail, named Donna Kay Trapini. She seemed smart, articulate, driven and extremely interested in sex, which presumably after 21 years of marriage, he felt that his wife could or would not provide. He embarked upon a passionate physical affair that was to last nearly two years before his long suffering spouse discovered their relationship.

Gail kept the home fires burning while her husband traveled and worked to keep food on the family table. While she was intelligent and well educated, Gail was guided by her abiding Catholic faith and believed that her place was with her children and her family. However much she tried to maintain her steadfastness through faith, the chinks in her armor showed through, however. Gail often talked of suicide when her husband was away and in her heart, she adon10knew he was unfaithful. She shared these suicidal feelings with her teenage children who lived at home, and as a result, they were constantly in fear for her safety. With their father always gone on business and their mother expressing suicidal ideations, the children had an unsteady and frightening introduction to young adulthood. All these feelings started to come to a head in the late spring of 1999, when George’s mistress and, by this point, boss, began to extend their relationship beyond their adulterous bed and into his family home.

George somehow thought that he could have whatever he wanted, whenever he wanted it. He actually left his wife, Gail, to move in with his mistress Donna Trapani in Florida in early 1999. He never told Gail, however, that he was moving out; rather, he simply told her that he needed an apartment in Florida to pursue his fledgling business. Somehow Gail bought into this. So George moved in with Donna and soon got to know his mistress, perhaps more than he wanted to. Donna turned out to be a woman of many faces.

Donna Kay Trapani was born in mean circumstances in Louisiana to a mother who hadn’t education or wealth, and a father who’d skipped out before she set foot into the world. Donna struggled with her weight throughout her years in school and finally had bariatric surgery in her early college years. Her ensuing weight loss boosted her self-confidence and she went on to participate in collegiate pep squads as well as the active dating life she had always desired but had been denied in her early years. Even Screen Shot 2014-08-07 at 3.13.00 PMDonna’s mother, who to this day believes in her innocence, admits that Donna was obsessed with her appearance and success both before and after her surgery. Narcissism is typically self-loathing and insecurity masquerading as bravado. Donna met and married her husband, an aircraft mechanic, and moved to the Florida panhandle. There are reports that Donna and her husband were unable to conceive a child; perhaps that’s true, I cannot say. However, Donna had ambitions for herself and wasn’t content to simply be the wife of a mechanic. Nursing degree in hand, she started an employment agency for visiting nurses and was determined to become a business tycoon. Reports from many of her previous employees indicate that Donna was volatile with a vile temper, and often lashed out at people over the smallest of infractions. They also indicated that she was a habitual liar, something she demonstrated herself when she took the stand in her own defense at trial. Her stories were wildly improbable, but she would cling to them as though by simply telling them, she could make them true or even believable.

When she met George, Donna was CEO of her company CCHH, and was often out on the town at the bars with the single nurses from her firm, despite having a husband at home who disapproved of this behavior. We get the sense that Donna did whatever Donna wanted; she was always in charge and always needed to be the commander. At any rate, she and George inevitably struck up a physical relationship which grew from there to take on epic proportions, which would ultimately cost Gail her life.

Screen Shot 2014-08-07 at 3.13.58 PMDonna was pretty clear about her intentions throughout the affair. She wanted what she wanted, and she wanted it on her terms. She wanted George, sans wife, and she would do whatever it took to get there, including murder. George, on the other hand, did what he had done his whole life; he manipulated, cajoled, lied and did the expedient thing to get what he wanted in the moment. George wanted hot sex on the side and a reverent obedient wife at home. So he told Donna what he believed she wanted to hear and didn’t tell Gail much of anything. Gail wanted what she wanted too, but she prayed to God to give it to her instead of facing her issues and addressing them with her husband. She did resort to threats of suicide and tried to inflict guilt on George in the hope he would change. Clearly, her efforts could not succeed and the situation grew increasingly volatile.

There have been untold numbers of love triangles, with unfaithful husbands, leading to divorces and families shattered by the sins of the flesh, but this triangle was a mix of personalities that seemed doomed to end in tragedy. A prime example of how these three dysfunctional personalities interacted is their behavior over the 4th of July weekend in 1999. What all three of them did adon12is nearly incomprehensible to most people involved in normal relationships. Donna, having been thrown over by George some months earlier, sent him a letter on doctor’s letterhead, stating that not only was she pregnant but that she had terminal lymphoma as well. George, being either completely gullible or wanting to have his cake and eat it too, invited Donna up to Michigan for the holiday weekend so that she could search for an apartment near his home. He said his goal was to be able to take care of Donna and the anticipated child in her time of need. To facilitate this misguided plan, George set up a meeting between his wife and his mistress at Donna’s hotel. This, of course, was a total failure. Gail became hysterically distraught and Donna turned cruel and vicious, and became even more possessive. George decided to spend the night with Donna in her hotel room, had sex with her, and then dumped her the following morning. The fact that Gail let him back into the family home after this is an indication of her complete lack of self-esteem and total dependence upon George. This disastrous weekend turned out to be the trigger that would set the murder in motion.

adonDonna Trapani was infuriated over being dumped and became obsessive about winning George back. She began a torrent of phone calls to his home, letters, emails and faxes in which she first tried cajoling and wheedling, then laid on the guilt trip, and finally resorted to vitriol in order to make George come back. Much of the venom was directed at Gail, whom Donna viewed as the barrier to their relationship. When all her attempts failed, as they were destined to do simply based on the hysteria of the communications, she hired three misfits to take out her rival in a hail of bullets. She enlisted one of her habitually errant employees — 38 year old Sybil Padgett, and Sybil’s 19 year old boyfriend, Patrick Alexander, to plan and carry out the murder. They, in turn, connected Donna to Kevin Ouellette, the intended trigger man, a cold opportunist who would do anything for a fast buck. Promised $15,000 from Donna, the hit squad headed to Lake Orion from their Florida home to execute Gail Fulton. Donna’s big mistake was not realizing that if you hire killers, you probably need to actually pay them. Since she failed to follow through on her part of the bargain, all three of her co-conspirators rolled over on her and she was eventually arrested for first degree murder and conspiracy to commit murder. Kevin and Patrick were offered plea deals in return for their testimony against Donna and Sybil, but the prosecutors had no intention of offering any such deal to the women, both of whom were convicted and sentenced to life in prison without parole. Both subsequently lost their appeals.

adon4I believe Donna suffers from Borderline personality disorder with marked narcissistic features. When you analyze her actions with her employees, her ex-husband, her ‘recruits’ for murder, and her behavior afterwards, it’s clear that she is disorganized in thought and deed. She is prone to dramatic mood shifts, outbursts of anger and delusional thought patterns. Her constant self-aggrandizing precludes all feelings of conscience for her actions. She truly feels that any means justify the ends, which in her case are whatever she happens to desire at the moment. In this, she reminds me of Jodi Arias. Both believe that they deserve the object of their desire. Both believe that this “object” will propel their lives beyond the mundane existence they believe they currently have and fantasize that a life with this person will enhance their lives far beyond their current state. Both were devastated when the object of their desire rejected them, and they acted out in the only way they apparently could – with fury and destruction. Both told wild tales about their actions with seemingly no compunction, both on and off the witness stand, and both gave TV interviews over their attorneys’ objections immediately after their convictions. Sadly, both were destined to lose their ‘prizes’ because their intrinsically flawed psyches would ultimately preclude them from any type of successful relationship that would fulfill their needs. It’s a tragedy that people fell victim to them, but it was perhaps inevitable given their manipulative, determined natures.

adon8What made Gail Fulton’s murder even more tragic was her complete innocence and probable naivete. While her death was no one’s fault but Donna and her cohorts, Gail contributed to the situation by not standing up for herself or insisting that George behave in a manner appropriate for a husband and father. By allowing George to mistreat her, disrespect their marriage, and return home forgiven, despite his lack of remorse or apology, she gave him free rein to do as he pleased. George must have thought that he had the perfect situation. His wife would never leave him nor kick him to the curb. He could fulfill his sexual desires and still maintain the semblance of a stable home and family life. George essentially loaded the gun that was Donna Trapani. Did he know that she had severe issues that could turn deadly? It’s not likely that he did, but his willful ignorance when her behavior became obsessive and erratic placed his family in grave danger. The toxic mess resulting from these three personality types being thrown together and placed under extreme duress inevitably exploded killing Gail Fulton and destroying lives and families in both Florida and Michigan.

 

Please click here to view The Starks Shrink’s Other Posts:

starkCharlie Bothuell V May Have a Very Sharp Axe to Grind

The Overheating Death of Cooper Harris: Murder or Tragic Accident?

Why Beautiful Murderesses Inflame the Passions of the True Crime Fan

Going Postal Goes Fed-Ex!

How to Raise a Serial Killer in 10 Easy Steps

The Julie Schenecker Tragedy: Negligence, Finger-Pointing and the Death of Children

Luka Magnotta: Man, Boy or Beast?

The Disturbing Truth about Mothers Who Murder Their Children

Teleka Patrick Needed a Psychiatrist, Not a Pastor!

Rehabbing the Wounded Juvenile Will Save Their Souls (and Ours)

Skylar Neese and the Mean Girls Who Killed Her

Top 51 Disturbing Quotes from 19 Disturbed Serial Killers

$
0
0

compiled by Patrick H. Moore

This compelling yet horrifying array of 51 disturbing quotes from 19 disturbed serial killers is drawn from the public domain. Although I’m quite certain that each and everyone of these killers had their moments of intense terror and loneliness, I am struck by the fact that some of them seem far more unhappy than others. For example, Aileen Wuornos may have been one of the most unhappy women that every lived. Compared to her, suave Mr. Bundy seems to to be feeling only moderate pain, while the deadly Dahmer appears to be consumed with guilt over his actions. What all of this boils down to is that although serial killers may well shares many basic personality characteristics, they are all different which makes it tough to generalize effectively about them.

 

aiAileen Wuornos  (the saddest woman who ever lived)

“May your wife and children get raped, right in the ass. (to the jurors who convicted her) “

“To me, this world is nothing but evil, and my own evil just happened to come out cause of the circumstances of what I was doing.

 

ai2David Berkowitz  (was no doubt possessed by something though probably not the devil)

“A ‘possessed’ dog in the neighborhood won’t let me stop killing until he gets his fill of blood.”

“Hello from the gutters of New York City, which are filled with dog manure, vomit, stale wine, urine and blood.”

“I am a monster. I am the Son of Sam. I love to hunt.”

“I was literally singing to myself on my way home, after the killing. The tension, the desire to kill a woman had built up in such explosive proportions that when I finally pulled the trigger, all the pressures, all the tensions, all the hatred, had just vanished, dissipated, but only for a short time.”

“The demons wanted my penis.”

 

ai3Ed Gein  (the inspiration for Psycho, Texas Chainsaw Massacre and Silence of the Lambs. Gein lived in my home state of Wisconsin)

“She isn’t missing. She’s at the farm right now.”

“I had a compulsion to do it.”

“They smelled bad.”

 

ai4Edmund Kemper (Big Ed was tall, large and reportedly had the I.Q. of a genius. He has been a model prisoner.)

“Even when she was dead, she was still bitching at me. I couldn’t get her to shut up!”

“I just wanted to see how it felt to shoot Grandma.”

“I remember there was actually a sexual thrill . . . you hear that little pop and pull their heads of and hold their heads up by the hair. Whipping their heads off, their body sitting there. That’d get me off.”

“The first good-looking girl I see tonight is going to die.”

“With a girl, there’s a lot left in the girl’s body without a head. Of course, the personality is gone.”

 

ai6H.H Holmes (completely unique in that he built his notorious Murder Castle where he apparently did in his victims)

“I was born with the devil in me. I could not help the fact that I was a murderer, no more than the poet can help the inspiration to sing..I was born with the evil one standing as my sponsor beside the bed where I was ushered into the world, and he has been with me since.”

 

 

ai7Henry Lee Lucas (Henry was without a doubt the victim of bad parenting. The cult film, “Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer” is loosely based on him and possibly Ottis Toole. I strongly recommend it but keep in mind, it is not for the faint at heart.)

“I hated all my life. I hated everybody. When I first grew up and can remember, I was dressed as a girl by mother. And I stayed that way for two or three years. And after that was treated like what I call the dog of the family. I was beaten. I was made to do things that no human bein’ would want to do.”

“Sex is one of my downfalls. I get sex any way I can get it. If I have to force somebody to do it, I do…I rape them; I’ve done that. I’ve killed animals to have sex with them, and I’ve had sex while they’re alive. “

 

ai8Ian Brady (Brady, killer of children along with his partner Myra Hindley, was apparently quite the intellectual. He is old and ill now and has expressed his fervent desire to die but the British authorities insist on keeping him alive by means of a feeding tube.)

“Contrary to popular perception, the so-called Moors Murders were merely an existential exercise of just over a year, which was concluded in December 1964.”

 

ai9Jeffrey Dahmer (What can you say about Dahmer that has not already been said and re-said?)

“I carried it too far, that’s for sure. “

“I’ve got to start eating at home more..”

“My consuming lust was to experience their bodies.I viewed them as objects, as strangers. It is hard for me to believe a human being could have done what I’ve done”

“I couldn’t find any meaning for my life when I was out there, I’m sure as hell not going to find it in here. This is the grand finale of a life poorly spent and the end result is just overwhelmingly depressing… it’s just a sick, pathetic, wretched, miserable life story, that’s all it is. How it can help anyone, I’ve no idea.”

 

ai10John Wayne Gacy (I don’t like this guy at all though I am weirdly enchanted by his Clown Paintings.)

“A clown can get away with murder.”

“The only thing they can get me for is running a funeral parlor without a license.”

 

ai19Peter Kurten  (known as The Vampire of Dusseldorf)

“After my head has been chopped off, will I still be able to hear, at least for a moment , the sound of my own blood gushing from my neck? That would be the best pleasure to end all pleasure. “

 

 

 

ammm

 

Richard Ramirez (The Night Stalker was smart and could have done much good in the world if he’d had a decent childhood.)

“Big deal, death comes with the territory. See you in Disneyland.”

“I’ve killed 20 people, man. I love all that blood.”

“Even psychopaths have emotions, then again, maybe not.”

“We’ve all got the power in our hands to kill, but most people are afraid to use it. The ones who aren’t afraid, control life itself.”

“You maggots make me sick, I will be avenged. Lucifer dwells within us all.”

 

ai11Ted Bundy  (There’s something quintessentially creepy about Bundy. A little too suave and self-serving for my taste.)

“I haven’t blocked out the past. I wouldn’t trade the person I am, or what I’ve done – or the people I’ve known – for anything. So I do think about it. And at times it’s a rather mellow trip to lay back and remember.”

“I just liked to kill, I wanted to kill.”

“You learn what you need to kill and take care of the details…Its like changing a tire…The 1st time you’re careful…By the 30th time, you can’t remember where you left the lug wrench.”

“You feel the last bit of breath leaving their body. You’re looking into their eyes. A person in that situation is God!”

 

Albert DeSalvo just after his capture in Boston on February 25, 1967.Albert DeSalvo (Although DeSalvo was definitely a rapist, it has not been definitively settled whether he was actually a murderer. That could be why his quote seems unlike those of the “real” serial killers. His remains have been exhumed in hopes of obtaining DNA matches.)

“It wasn’t as dark and scary as it sounds. I had a lot of fun…killing somebody’s a funny experience.”

 

ai13Albert Fish (Like Henry Lee Lucas, Fish was very likely prone to exaggerating his evil deeds. He was one of the early lucky fellows to “ride the chair” at Sing Sing Correctional Facility in New York.)

“I always had the desire to inflict pain on others and to have others inflict pain on me. I always seemed to enjoy everything that hurt. The desire to inflict pain, that is all that is uppermost. “

 “I saw so many boys whipped, it took root in my head.”

 “I like children, they are tasty.”

 

ai15Arthur Shawcross (This execrable human claimed to have eaten the vaginas of 3 of his 11 known female victims.)

“I took the right leg of that woman’s body, from the knee to the hip took the fat off and ate it while he stared at the other girl. When I bit into it she just urinated right there.”

“She was giving me oral sex, and she got carried away . . . So I choked her.”

 

 

ai14Dennis Rader ( “BTK” was his infamous signature. It stands for “Bind, Torture, Kill”.)

“When this monster entered my brain, I will never know, but it is here to stay. How does one cure himself? I can’t stop it, the monster goes on, and hurts me as well as society. Maybe you can stop him. I can’t.”

“I actually think I may be possessed with demons, I was dropped on my head as a kid.”

 

 

ai17Charles Manson  (You have to admit that Charlie is quite the character.)

“I’ve killed no one. I’ve ordered no one to be killed. These children who come to you with their knives, they’re your children. I didn’t teach them, you did.”

“Total paranoia is just total awareness.”

“Believe me, if I started murdering people there’d be none of ya left.”

“You know, if I wanted to kill somebody, I’d take this book and beat you to death with it. And I wouldn’t feel a thing. It’d be just like walking to the drug store.”

 

ai16Carl Panzram (Panzram confessed to 22 murders, and to having sodomized over 1,000 males. He was hanged for having murdered a prison employee at Leavenworth Federal Penitentiary in 1930.)

“I wish you all had one neck and that I had my hands on it.”

 “Today I am dirty , but tomorrow I’ll be just dirt.”

“Hurry up, you Hoosier bastard, I could kill ten men while you’re fooling around!”

 

ai18The Zodiac Killer Quotes (The Zodiac was very smart although he certainly might have been brought to justice if modern forensic techniques had been available during his “reign of terror”.)

“If the blue meanies are going to get me they’d better get off their asses and do something.”

The Monstrous H.H. Holmes and His Murder Castle Inc.

$
0
0

by Darcia Helle

You’ve probably fantasized about your dream home. Most of us do. You might want a spacious mansion, a decadent penthouse, or an old farmhouse. Chances are you won’t be fantasizing about a Murder Castle. It’s even less likely that you’ll be designing and building one. But H.H. Holmes did just that.

hhh16Holmes was born Herman Webster Mudgett, on May 16, 1861, in Gilmanton, New Hampshire. His parents, Levi Horton Mudgett and Theodate Page Price, were farmers and devout Methodists. We don’t know a lot about Holmes’s early life. Some reports state that his father was a violent alcoholic, though it’s unclear how much, if any, abuse Holmes endured during his father’s drunken outbursts. Holmes claimed to have been bullied as a child, brought on in part by his fear of the local doctor. Hoping to terrorize him, the bullies forced Holmes to look at and touch a human skeleton. This scheme apparently backfired and instead sparked his lifelong obsession with death.

 Holmes began his adult life with a con job. On July 4, 1878, he married Clara Lovering with the sole intent of using her money to put himself through medical school. Their son, Robert Lovering Mudgett, was born on February 3, 1880 in Loudon, New Hampshire. We don’t know what kind of relationship Holmes had with his wife and son in those early years. Holmes struggled in medical school, all the while resenting the wealthy, carefree students who didn’t need to work to support a family.

hhh18While in medical school, Holmes was exposed to the questionable practice of buying and selling skeletons and freshly dead bodies. Medical schools needed intact skeletons and cadavers for their students, and their methods for supplying those bodies were not monitored by law enforcement or any agency. Though they didn’t flaunt their practices and were careful not to purchase obvious murder victims, their questionable methods were a kind of open secret. Holmes paid attention and soon found ways to use this to his advantage.

Holmes’s descent into the macabre began with stealing dead bodies from the medical school laboratory. He’d take out life insurance policies on the dead under false names, disfigure them so they were unrecognizable, then claim they’d died accidentally so that he could collect the insurance. Not long afterward, he realized it was smarter to use newly dead bodies, since they had yet to be embalmed. This afforded him a double scam. After collecting on the life insurance, he could sell the body to the medical school. And so began Holmes’s career as a killer.

In June of 1884, Holmes managed to pass his final examinations. He’d done so poorly at the medical school that the board had to vote twice before agreeing to give Holmes his license. The problem wasn’t that Holmes lacked intelligence, but rather he lacked the focus and desire to perform well on exams. Not long after receiving his medical degree, he left Clara Lovering, changed his name from Herman Mudgett to Dr. Henry Howard Holmes, and moved to Chicago.

hhh3Holmes began his new life working as a pharmacist in a drugstore owned by Dr. Elizabeth S. Holton. She soon sold the business to Holmes, most likely because she’d become pregnant though this is more speculation than fact. By most accounts, Holmes was a well-liked and respected businessman. No one questioned his identity or credentials.

On January 28, 1887, he married Myrta Belknap, despite not having divorced his first wife, Clara. For the most part, Holmes kept Myrta away from his business. Their family home was in Wilmette, Illinois, but he spent most of his time at his pharmacy in the Englewood neighborhood of Chicago. Today the travel time is only about 30 minutes by car, but would have been far longer back in the late 1800s. Holmes eventually had three children with Myrta, though again it’s unclear how much time and attention he gave his new family.

hhh10Around this time, work began on the World Columbian Exposition – now known as the Chicago World’s Fair – which was expected to be the largest event in history. The site where the fair would be held was only about three miles from the Englewood neighborhood where Holmes worked. Though he had very little money of his own, Holmes managed to con creditors and use further scams to purchase an empty lot across from his drugstore. He immediately began work on the design and construction of what he claimed would be a hotel for the fairgoers. In reality, though, Holmes had other grisly ideas from the very start.

The massive three-story building took up the entire city block, and locals began referring to it as the Castle. Holmes moved his drugstore to the bottom floor, along with various other shops. The two upper floors were a maze containing his office and “guest” rooms. Within this labyrinth were 100 windowless rooms, doorways opening to brick walls, stairways leading nowhere, doors that only opened from the outside, closets with trap doors in the floor, and hallways hhh4jutting out at odd angles. Throughout the construction, Holmes repeatedly changed builders, often using workers from out of town, and never shared his completed plans with anyone.

In 1889, during the three-year period of construction, Holmes met the carpenter Benjamin Pitezel. The two formed a relationship of sorts that Pitezel and his family would eventually pay dearly for. Holmes and Pitezel traveled together, sometimes sharing a room. They also schemed together, particularly with insurance fraud. Despite what Pitezel took to be friendship, Holmes seems to have marked his friend as a victim early on.

The city of Chicago was consumed with preparation for the upcoming fair, and so was Holmes. He hired young, single women to work in his Castle as maids and secretaries. All were given life insurance policies as part of their job benefits, which Holmes paid for and was also beneficiary of. While Holmes and Pitezel had plans for insurance fraud, Holmes actually had plans for much more. Although Pitezel believed they were merely scamming the life insurance companies, Holmes was actually murdering the women.

Chicago bustled with activity during the years leading up to the fair. Workers needed to live close by. Supplies were trucked in. The local economy boomed. The surroundings offered the perfect cover for Holmes’s murder spree.

Approximately 27 million people passed through Chicago during the fair’s six-month span. Crime ran rampant. Strangers came and went, filling the city with transients. The fledgling, understaffed police force couldn’t keep up. Holmes found his ideal playground.

hhh5The Castle had been made to the specifications of a madman. Secret passages, sound-proofed rooms, and specially greased chutes were only the beginning. Holmes had stocked his Murder Castle with torture equipment, such as an elongated bed with straps thought to be used to see how far the human body could be stretched. Some of the rooms were equipped with gas pipes, so he could slowly poison his guests while they remained locked inside. He’d installed a special furnace that burned hot enough to incinerate bone, and kept vats of acid for eating away flesh. The special chutes gave him a convenient method of moving bodies from the second and third floors down to the basement for disposal.

Of course, at the time no one but Holmes knew the reasons for the odd, maze-like construction. The missing maids and secretaries were easily explained. Young, single women often left to marry. Or went home to visit their families. Guests came and went all over the city. They weren’t known and were rarely associated with a stay at Holmes’s hotel. No one questioned the respected businessman running The Castle.

In October 1893, when the fair shut down, activity in Chicago came to a grinding halt. The economy fell into a slump. Creditors were catching up to Holmes, who’d failed to pay most of the construction costs for his Murder Castle. So he did what he’d become good at, and made plans to scam an insurance company.

hhh6Around this time, the Murder Castle caught fire. Dates differ depending on the source. Some cite August 19, 1894 but most claim the fire occurred in November 1893. It’s possible these were two separate fires, with the first being smaller and unsuccessful. Most agree that Holmes was in deep with debt and attempted arson to collect on the $60,000 insurance policy he held on his castle. The insurance company was not as easily scammed as the life insurance companies he’d worked with in the past. Because Holmes constantly changed the building’s ownership papers in order to avoid creditors, the insurance company argued fraud. They refused to pay and Holmes had no choice but to flee. Soon police and firemen were uncovering the gruesome scene Holmes had left behind.

Holmes, unaware authorities were on to him back in Chicago, went blissfully along his murderous path. He traveled to Fort Worth, Texas, where he had property he’d inherited in one of his murder schemes. There is speculation that he attempted to build a second murder castle, but for whatever reasons, he abandoned the project and moved on. He then traveled to Denver, where he married Georgia Yoke on January 17, 1894. The two had met at the fair, and Georgia seems to be the only woman Holmes ever truly loved.

hhh8In July, 1894, Holmes – under his new identity of H.M. Howard – was arrested for the first time on charges of horse swindling. While in prison, he met convicted train robber Marion Hedgepeth, and the two of them concocted a plan for insurance fraud. Holmes was to fake his death, Hedgepeth would collect on the life insurance claim, and the two of them would share the money. Hedgepeth gave Holmes the name of a lawyer who was an associate and would happily comply with their scam. But after leaving prison, Holmes quickly forgot about Hedgepeth. Instead he made a similar plan with his friend Benjamin Pitezel, only this time it was Pitezel who was supposed to fake his death.

Holmes and Pitezel devised a scheme, though it’s unclear how much of the plan Holmes intended on sticking. In Philadelphia, Pitezel would assume the identity of an inventor named B.F. Perry. Holmes was to procure a corpse, presumably from a mortuary or medical school. Holmes and Pitezel would then rig a laboratory explosion in which B.F. Perry would be killed, with the cadaver as Pitezel’s stand-in, becoming disfigured and therefore unrecognizable in the blaze. Pitezel’s wife would then collect the $10,000 life insurance policy and they would split the money.

hhhAt some point, Holmes came up with a much more elaborate and lucrative plan of his own. Pitezel tended to be melancholy, slightly depressive, and a heavy drinker. Holmes used this to his advantage, feeding his friend alcohol until he’d passed out. After arranging the scene to his liking, Holmes doused his friend in flammable liquid, concentrating on Pitezel’s face, and lit a match. His friend, Benjamin Pitezel, might have been alive when he was set on fire, though this detail is unclear.

Holmes’s wife Georgia had accompanied Holmes to Philadelphia during this time, though she knew nothing about the insurance fraud or the murder. After killing Pitezel, Holmes took his wife back to their home in Indianapolis. He then traveled to St. Louis, where he told Carrie Pitezel, Benjamin’s wife, that Pitezel was in hiding until they’d safely collected on the claim.

In the meantime, on September 4, 1894, a visitor to the Philadelphia office of B.F. Perry arrived to find the door locked. Thinking this strange, she contacted the police who then forced the door open. Inside the office, they found the body of a man with severe burns. A pipe, matches, and a broken bottle with remnants of a flammable liquid similar to benzene, or possibly chloroform, lay nearby. The victim of an apparent explosion, police assumed him to be B.F. Perry, who’d recently rented the office.

hhh11About two weeks after the discovery of Perry’s body, Fidelity Mutual Life Association of Philadelphia received a letter from St. Louis claiming B.F. Perry was actually Benjamin F. Pitezel, whose life had been insured by their company. Soon two professional men arrived in Fidelity’s Philadelphia office, claiming to represent the widow Pitezel. One introduced himself as Dr. H.H. Holmes, with the explanation that Mrs. Pitezel was too ill to travel. The other man was Jephtha Howe, Mrs. Pitezel’s attorney. With them was one of Pitezel’s children, 14-year-old Alice. Holmes made the identification, assuring the insurance representatives that Pitezel had certain specific moles and markings enabling him to do so despite the severe burns. The $10,000 insurance claim was paid to Holmes, who was there acting on behalf of the widow Pitezel and her five children.

Fidelity would likely never have questioned any of this if it hadn’t been for an angry, vindictive prisoner Holmes had double-crossed. Marion Hedgepeth, the man Holmes had once share a cell with back in St. Louis, was furious that Holmes had used a version of their scam and the lawyer he’d recommended, but had reneged on his promise to share the money. Hedgepeth gave a detailed account of the scheme to police, who then passed the information on to Fidelity. Though Hedgepeth only knew Holmes as H.M. Howard, it didn’t take long for the insurance company to figure out that Howard was actually H.H. Holmes. They tried unsuccessfully to track him themselves, and soon hired investigators from the Pinkerton National Detective Agency to chase him down.

Holmes now had the money in his pocket and assured Carrie Pitezel that he would lead her to her husband, but they had to be careful not to be followed or caught. He also managed to convince her that it would be best if he took three of the children – Alice, Nellie, and Howard – with him, leaving Carrie to travel only with the oldest and the youngest of her children.

hhh7Holmes inexplicably took the three children across country, at the same time traveling with his wife Georgia. And so began Holmes’s game of human chess. He managed to move his wife and the children from one city to the next, together but separately. The children were kept hidden away in rooms, hotels, and sometimes houses, without his wife ever knowing of their existence. Each day the children wrote letters to their mother, detailing their experience on the run. Each day Holmes took the letters with a promise to ensure their mother received them, which of course she never did.

While he shuffled the children and his wife from city to city, Holmes had Carrie Pitezel and her two remaining children moving along a parallel route. Holmes devised an elaborate ruse, supplying multiple forwarding addresses for communications. At various times, he told Carrie that her children were safe with a widow in Indianapolis and a wealthy woman in London, and that her husband was safely hiding, first in Canada and later in London.

hhh20Amidst all of this, detectives from the Pinkerton Agency somehow managed to track down Holmes. Finally, on the afternoon of November 16, 1894, H.H. Holmes was arrested in Boston as he reportedly prepared to take a steamship to England. Because the insurance scheme and Pitezel’s murder had taken place in Philadelphia, Detective Thomas Crawford brought Holmes back there. The police in Chicago, where the Murder Castle held his many atrocities, were initially unaware of Holmes’s arrest.

During the time Holmes awaited trial and, later, while awaiting execution, he spun extravagant tales about his escapades. He always claimed innocence, and his stories changed frequently. Months passed and the Pitezel children were nowhere to be found. Finally, in the early summer of 1895, Detective Frank Geyer was assigned to track them down.

hhh13For reasons never explained, Holmes had kept all the letters the children had written to their mother. The letters were in his possession when he was arrested. Using these letters as a guide, Detective Geyer took a train to the Midwest to begin his search. In Cincinnati, Ohio, Geyer found someone who remembered Holmes traveling with the children. He’d been using the alias Alex E. Cook, which he’d sometimes used in prior business matters. That contact led Geyer to a woman who’d seen Holmes with a boy in a nearby house. But there was no sign of the children.

When those leads dried up, Geyer continued using the letters to follow the trail. He wound up in Detroit, where Alice had written the last of her letters to her mother. In this letter, Alice wrote, “Howard is not with us now.” This, to Geyer, almost ensured that Holmes had killed the boy prior to arriving in Detroit.

Geyer followed more leads to Toronto, Canada, where he questioned real estate agents about a man traveling with two young girls. He was told about a man who’d rented a home for a short time. A woman identified Holmes from a photograph, stating he was in fact the man who’d rented the house. He’d also requested the use of a spade to plant potatoes in the cellar, and had only brought one mattress into the house.

hhh2Inside, Geyer found the cellar had a soft dirt floor that appeared recently disturbed. Almost immediately after he began digging, the specific stench of human decay filled the air. Three feet down, Geyer came upon a small arm bone. He stopped digging and had an undertaker continue the job. Soon they had exhumed the bodies of two girls, both naked, believed to be Nellie and Alice Pitezel.

Detective Geyer was now determined to find the body of Howard Pitezel. He knew Howard had been separated from his sisters before arriving in Detroit, so he backtracked the route laid out in the girls’ letters and went to Indianapolis. Eventually, instinct and luck brought Geyer to Irvington, Indianapolis, where he found a man who’d rented a house to Holmes. The man recalled a small boy had been with Holmes.

Geyer checked the basement but found no disturbed dirt and no body. He did find a trunk in a small alcove and sent the description to Carrie Pitezel via telegram. When she replied that the trunk was hers, Geyer knew he’d found the right place.

In the barn, Geyer found a coal stove with stains that looks like dried blood. A local doctor poked through the ash and showed Geyer pieces of charred bone, which turned out to be part of a skull and femur belonging to a male child. Geyer dismantled the chimney, where they discovered a complete set of teeth and a piece of a jaw. A dentist identified these as belonging to a boy 7 to 10-years-old. More grisly body parts were uncovered at the bottom of the chimney, and Geyer had no doubt he’d found Howard.

hhh12By this time, Chicago was battling Philadelphia for the right to try Holmes first. Philadelphia prevailed, and Holmes’s trial for the murder of Benjamin Pitezel began on October 28, 1895. On the first day, Holmes decided to fire his lawyers and defend himself. This was unprecedented in the U.S. where no murder defendant had ever before  chosen to represent himself. Various accounts describe Holmes as cool and calm or monstrous and out of control. An article in the Philadelphia Inquirer called his behavior in court “remarkable”.

The trial lasted five days. Despite Holmes’s courtroom theatrics and declarations of innocence, the jury convicted him of Pitezel’s murder and the judge sentenced him to death by hanging. Holmes would not stand trial for the murder of the three Pitezel children or any of the atrocities done at the Murder Castle.

After his conviction, Holmes was paid $10,000 from the Hearst newspaper syndicate to write a public confession. He did so, and the piece was published in The Philadelphia Inquirer. Knowing he had no hope of appeal, Holmes changed tactics and decided to brag about his conquests. Initially he claimed to have killed more than 100 people, though he soon retracted that confession and changed the number to 27. As his hanging loomed ever closer, he wrote, “I was born with the Evil One as my sponsor beside the bed where I was ushered into the world.

On May 7, 1896, H.H. Holmes was hanged. His final words were a retraction of all his confessions, and a declaration of innocence:

hhh9“Gentleman,” he said, “I have a very few words to say. In fact, I would make no statement at this time except that by not speaking I would appear to acquiesce in life in my execution. I only want to say that the extent of my wrongdoings in taking human life consisted in the deaths of two women, they having died at my hands as the result of criminal operations. I wish to also state, however, so that there will be no misunderstanding hereafter, I am not guilty of taking the life of any of the Pitezel family. The three children or the father, Benjamin F. Pitezel, of whose death I am now convicted and for which I am today to be hanged. That is all.”

The two women’s deaths Holmes admitted to being responsible for were, he claimed, a sort of medical malpractice. When the trap was sprung, the gallows malfunctioned and Holmes’s neck did not snap in the fall. He dangled for about 15 minutes, reportedly twitching, before succumbing to death.

Holmes had been terrified that body snatchers would steal his corpse and sell it for a profit, and so he’d made arrangements with an attorney to have his body buried in a coffin filled with cement. Two Pinkerton guards stood over the grave in Holy Cross Cemetery as the coffin was placed and the entire grave filled with cement. No stone was erected to mark the spot.

hhh17In the end, no clear answers or motives were ever provided for Holmes’s gruesome deeds. When Chicago officials went over missing persons records and various registries during the time of the fair, they surmised that his victim count could be as high as 200. We’ll never know what drove Holmes or how many lives he really took. He was only 35-years-old when he died on the gallows.

  • While researching this case, I came across a variety of spellings for Benjamin Pitezel’s name. An 1895 issue of the Chicago Tribune has it spelled Pitzel, as does a feature story in a 1943 issue of Harper’s Magazine. One 1894 article in the New York Times has it spelled Pietzel, while another spelled it Pitzel. All later articles have his name as Pitezel, which is the spelling I stuck with here.

 

Please click to below to view Darcia’s Helle’s many excellent posts:

Modern Day Executioners Despise the Death Penalty

‘Trial by Media’ Is Not a New Phenomenon: The Kangaroo Hanging of Alvin Edwin Batson

“Met Her on the Mountain”: Cold Case Social Worker Hog-Tied, Raped and Killed in Appalachia

Jovial Private Bartender Snaps; Assaults and Drags Obnoxious 84-Year-Old Club Patron

Frank Lloyd Wright and the Great Gasoline Mass Murder

Edward Elmore Rode the Legal Railroad to 30 Years on Death Row: His Crime? Simple! He Was Black and Poor

 “The Wrong Carlos”: Non-Violent Manchild Executed for Murder He Did Not Commit

The Electric Chair Nightmare: An Infamous and Agonizing History

Autopsies: Truth, Fiction and Maura Isles and Her 5-Inch-Heels

Don’t Crucify Me, Dude! Just Shoot Me Instead! Spartacus and Death by Crucifixion

To Burn or Not to Burn? Auto-Da-Fé Is Not Good for Women or Children!

The Disgraceful Entrapment of Jesse Snodgrass: Keep the Narcs Out of Our Schools

Why Should I Believe You? The History of the Polygraph

“Don’t Behead Me, Dude!”: The Story of Beheading and the Invention of the Guillotine

Aileen Wuornos, America’s First High-Profile Female Serial Killer, Never Had a Chance

The Terror of ISO: A Descent into Madness

Al Capone Could Not Bribe the Rock: Alcatraz, Fortress of Doom

Cyberspace, Darknet, Murder-for-Hire and the Invisible Black Machine

Cyberspace, Darknet, Murder-for-Hire and the Invisible Black Machine

darcDarcia Helle lives in a fictional world with a husband who is sometimes real. Their house is ruled by spoiled dogs and cats and the occasional dust bunny.

Suspense, random blood splatter and mismatched socks consume Darcia’s days. She writes because the characters trespassing through her mind leave her no alternative. Only then are the voices free to haunt someone else’s mind.

Join Darcia in her fictional world: www.QuietFuryBooks.com

The characters await you.

Bestiality Is Legal in the Same States That Ban Same-Sex Marriage!

$
0
0

by Robert Emmett Murphy, Jr.

The subject of this post is the entrenchment of sexual perversion in American law and how that is reflected in the ideological make-up of the various regions of this great but threatened nation. I am talking specifically about Bestiality, which is legal in 36% of American states.

best4Bestiality is a misdemeanor in the following 19 states (or territories):

Alaska; California; Colorado; Connecticut; Florida; Iowa; Kansas; Louisiana; Maine; Maryland; Minnesota; Nebraska; New York; North Dakota; Oregon; Pennsylvania; Utah; Virgin Islands; and Wisconsin

 

Bestiality is charged as a felony in these 16 states (or territories) :

Arizona; Deleware; Georgia; Illinois; Indiana; Massachusetts; Michigan; Mississippi; North Carolina; Oklahoma; Puerto Rico; Rhode Island; South Carolina; South Dakota; Tennessee; and Washington

 

Bestiality is completely legal in the following 18 states, districts, and territories:

Alabama; Arkansas; Washington, D.C.; Guam; Hawaii; Kentucky; Montana; Nevada; New Hampshire; New Jersey; New Mexico; Ohio; Texas; Vermont; Virginia; West Virginia; and Wyoming

 

homeThe ideological thrust of these Bestiality Fifth Columnists is obvious when one compares where this perversion is accepted to those places where Same-Sex Marriages are banned. In 55% of the states wherein Bestiality is legal, Same Sex Marriage is not. The states which do not criminalize Bestiality, yet ban Same Sex Marriage are as follows:

Kentucky; Montana; New Jersey; Nevada; Ohio; Texas; Virginia; West Virginia; and Wyoming (Note: New Jersey does permit Civil Unions.)

 

In clear contrast, Bestiality is illegal in the 12 states where Same Sex Marriage is accepted. These states are as follows:

California; Connecticut; Delaware; Iowa; Maine; Maryland; Massachusetts; Minnesota; New York; Rhode Island; Vermont; and Washington

Only 3 states do not ban Bestiality but do endorse Same Sex Marriage, thus straying from the above pattern. These states are:

New Hampshire; New Mexico; and Vermont (in the case of New Mexico, there are no laws on the books either endorsing or banning Same Sex Marriage so it’s actual sexual/ideological orientation is currently ambiguous).

*     *     *     *     *

So we are left with a burning question. Is there a correlation between being pro-Bestiality and rabidly Homophobic? Is it possible that approving of or actively practicing Bestiality turns one into a Homophobe?  The statistics suggest one, or the other, or both. :-)

 

Click here to view this fascinating post by Robert Emmett Murphy, Jr.:

Let the Police Do Their Work, Buddy: That Means You!

 

The ‘Butcher Baker’ Is Dead at Last: Alaska’s Most Prolific Serial Killer Robert Hansen Dies after 30 Years in Prison

$
0
0

compiled by Patrick H. Moore

It’s no secret that serial killers often masquerade as everyday good citizens. To some degree, Alaska’s most prolific serial killer, ‘Butcher Baker’ Robert Hansen, did precisely that. Hansen, who confessed to murdering 17 women and raping 30, mostly in the Alaskan wilderness, died recently at Alaska Regional Hospital after being in declining health for the past year. During his life as a free man, prior to his conviction in 1984, the Butcher Baker ran a bakery in Anchorage, Alaska and lived across town with his wife and children who had no idea that Dad was a deranged rapist/serial killer.

bak10Serial killers naturally vary considerably in their techniques and BB added an unusual and particular cruel wrinkle to his murder technique. Some of you who are ancient like me may have read a short story by Richard Connell first published in 1924 in Collier’s called “The Most Dangerous Game”. It’s the scintillating tale of a New York big-game hunter Rainsford who falls off a yacht and swims to an obscure island in the Caribbean where he is hunted in the jungle by a jaded Cossack aristocrat. Naturally, since it’s an adventure tale, Rainsford ultimately turns the tables on the Cossack, feeds him to his own dogs, and sleeps comfortably in his bed.

The Butcher Baker may have read Connell’s gripping tale; if not, he came up with a similar scenario on his own. His victims of choice were strippers and prostitutes who were plentiful in Boomstate Alaska during the 1970s and 1980s.

Rachel D’Oro writes:

Construction of the 800-mile trans-Alaska oil pipeline in the 1970s brought prostitutes, pimps, con artists and drug dealers to Alaska’s largest city, all aiming to separate construction workers from some of the big money they were pulling in. Many who looked for quick riches left as abruptly as they arrived in Anchorage, making sudden disappearances commonplace.

bak6According to retired trooper Glenn Flothe, who helped put Hansen behind bars, Hansen initially targeted any woman who caught his eye, but soon learned that due to their transient lifestyle, strippers and prostitutes were harder to track and less likely to be missed.

After selecting a victim, Hansen would abduct them and take them to remote places outside Anchorage. He was clever and would vary his modus operandi. Sometimes he would drive his victims to their doom, and other times he would fly them out into the middle of nowhere in his private plane. Sometimes being a licensed pilot comes in handy. Furthermore, he wouldn’t always kill the women he raped but would sometimes return them to Anchorage, warning them not to contact the authorities. “The Most Dangerous Game” connections stems from the fact that on other occasions, he would transport the women out into the wilderness, set them free, and then hunt them down with his rifle.

The Butcher Baker’s reign of terror began to show chinks in 1983 when he met 17-year-old Cindy Paulson. Hansen had offered Cindy $200 for oral sex, but when she got into the car, he pulled a gun on her and drove her to his house where he tortured and raped her. His exertions apparently wore him out; he chained her by the neck to a post in the basement and took a nap

bak11When he woke up, he put her in his car and drove her to the Merrill Field airport where he kept his Piper Super Cub. He told her his plan was to “take her out to his cabin” in the Knik River area of the Matanuska Valley, which was accessible only by boat or bush plane). While Hansen was busy loading the cockpit, Paulson made a run for it and escaped. Had she not gotten away, it’s very likely she would have been one of Hansen’s hunting victims.

She reported her nightmare to the police who questioned Hansen who of course denied the accusations and claimed Paulson was just mad because he wouldn’t kowtow to her extortion demands.

Amazingly, although Hansen had had several prior run-ins with the law, his meek demeanour and humble occupation as a baker, combined with a strong alibi from his friend John Henning, kept him from being considered as a serious suspect, and the case went cold.

bak8Dead bodies had begun turning up, however, with some evidence they had been killed by a hunter. Detective Frothe consulted with FBI agent Roy Hazelwood, and a criminal psychological profile was developed. Hazelwood believed that the killer would be an experienced hunter with low self-esteem, and would therefore, as is often the case, feel compelled to keep “souvenirs” of the murders, such as jewelry. With the help of the profile, Flothe investigated possible suspects and ultimately came to Hansen, who fit the profile and owned a plane. The remains of 23-year-old Sherry Morrow had been discovered in a shallow grave near the Knik River, which of course was accessible only by plane.

The screws were tightening and Flothe and the APD obtained a warrant to search Hansen’s plane, cars, and home. On 27 October, 1983, the investigators struck gold. They found jewelry associated with some of the missing women hidden in the corner of Hansen’s attic and an aviation map with little x marks on it secreted behind Hansen’s headboard.

bak5After that, it was only a matter of time, and Hansen finally confessed to more than a decade of attacks beginning as early as 1971. His earliest victims were teenagers, not the prostitutes and strippers who led to his discovery.

Hansen was serving a 461-year sentence at the time of his death which means he would have had to live to be as old as Methuselah to complete his sentence. Still, 30 years is a pretty decent stretch.

bak9The Associated Press attempted to interview Hansen 22 years after his conviction in 2006, but he rejected their request, writing in a unsigned note.

“I do not care so much for myself, but you journalist (sic) have hurt my family so very much.”

Hansen was the subject of a 2013 film titled, “The Frozen Ground,” which starred Nicolas Cage as an Alaska State Trooper investigating the slayings. John Cusack played Hansen.

* * * * *

bak4Hansen’s childhood provides at least some insight into the origins of his bloodthirsty ways. Although he was eventually to marry twice and have two children, he was a loner as a child and had a terrible relationship with his domineering father. To make matters worse, he stuttered and had bad acne, which led to bullying at school. Hunting was his escape and he served a year in the United States Army Reserve, and later worked as an assistant drill instructor at a police academy in Pocahontas, Iowa.

When he was 21, he was arrested for burning down a Pocahontas County Board of Education school bus garage, which led to him serving 20 months of a three-year prison sentence. His first wife, whom he had married shortly before burning down the garage, filed for divorce while he was incarcerated. After he got out, he was jailed several more times for petty theft. Thinking a change would do him good, in 1967, Hansen moved to Anchorage, Alaska, with his second wife, whom he had married shortly after his release from state prison.

bak3The amazing thing is the fact that in Anchorage, Hanson was well liked by his neighbors. His great prowess was as hunter and he set several local hunting records, quite a feat in big-game Alaska.

Ten years after moving to the north country, he went to jail for stealing a chainsaw. Later, he was diagnosed with bipolar disorder, and prescribed lithium which he may or may not have taken.

Without peeling back very many layers of the Serial Killer Onion, we see that the Butcher Baker had at least four qualities often associated with serial killers, and if we knew more about his childhood, we might discover more. He was 1) a loner; 2) had a dysfunctional relationship with his father; 3) loved killing animals (his specialty); and liked setting things on fire.

He was rather a late-bloomer, however, and apparently didn’t murder his first victim until 1971 when he was 32 years old.

Viewing all 1600 articles
Browse latest View live